Analysis of the PHQ-15 by individual items: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5093/anyes2022a7
O. Boiko, S. Barrio-Martínez, A. Priede, L. Ventura, Nerea Gómez-Carazo, Aida Hernández-Abellán, E. Setién-Suero, C. González-Blanch
{"title":"Analysis of the PHQ-15 by individual items: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"O. Boiko, S. Barrio-Martínez, A. Priede, L. Ventura, Nerea Gómez-Carazo, Aida Hernández-Abellán, E. Setién-Suero, C. González-Blanch","doi":"10.5093/anyes2022a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) is among the most commonly used questionnaires to assess somatic symptoms in primary care settings. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies that have analysed individual items from the PHQ-15 to determine the influence of differences in sociodemographic and clinical variables. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies analysing PHQ-15 by individual items were searched in Medline/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus from 1999 to November 2019. Results: Data were extracted from 13 studies. The most frequently reported symptoms were “pain in your arms, legs, or joints”, “back pain”, “headaches”, and “feeling tired or having low energy”. In patients with mental health disorders (depression, anxiety disorder, and somatoform disorder), the most commonly reported somatic symptoms were “trouble sleeping”, “feeling tired or having low energy”, and digestive symptoms. In the meta-analysis, females scored significantly higher than males on 3 of 14 items: “headaches” (odds ratio [OR] 2.16, p<.001), “dizziness” (OR 1.58, p<.001), and “stomach pain” (OR 1.46, p<.02), with a small to moderate effect size for these differences. Conclusions: Gender differences were detected for three items (headaches, dizziness, and stomach pain), although the magnitude of these differences was small. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between individual items and other sociodemographic variables. In addition, more research is needed to determine measurement invariance across various demographic groups. Provide a structured summary including, as applicable: background; objetives; data sources; study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions; study appraisal and synthesis methods; results; limitations; conclusiones","PeriodicalId":45616,"journal":{"name":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2022a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) is among the most commonly used questionnaires to assess somatic symptoms in primary care settings. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies that have analysed individual items from the PHQ-15 to determine the influence of differences in sociodemographic and clinical variables. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies analysing PHQ-15 by individual items were searched in Medline/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus from 1999 to November 2019. Results: Data were extracted from 13 studies. The most frequently reported symptoms were “pain in your arms, legs, or joints”, “back pain”, “headaches”, and “feeling tired or having low energy”. In patients with mental health disorders (depression, anxiety disorder, and somatoform disorder), the most commonly reported somatic symptoms were “trouble sleeping”, “feeling tired or having low energy”, and digestive symptoms. In the meta-analysis, females scored significantly higher than males on 3 of 14 items: “headaches” (odds ratio [OR] 2.16, p<.001), “dizziness” (OR 1.58, p<.001), and “stomach pain” (OR 1.46, p<.02), with a small to moderate effect size for these differences. Conclusions: Gender differences were detected for three items (headaches, dizziness, and stomach pain), although the magnitude of these differences was small. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between individual items and other sociodemographic variables. In addition, more research is needed to determine measurement invariance across various demographic groups. Provide a structured summary including, as applicable: background; objetives; data sources; study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions; study appraisal and synthesis methods; results; limitations; conclusiones
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PHQ-15的单项分析:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:患者健康问卷-15 (PHQ-15)是评估初级保健机构躯体症状最常用的问卷之一。我们研究的目的是对分析PHQ-15中个别项目的研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定社会人口统计学和临床变量差异的影响。方法:按照PRISMA声明进行系统评价。检索1999年至2019年11月在Medline/PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、Scopus中对PHQ-15进行单个项目分析的研究。结果:数据来自13项研究。报告中最常见的症状是“手臂、腿或关节疼痛”、“背痛”、“头痛”和“感到疲倦或精力不足”。在患有精神健康障碍(抑郁症、焦虑症和躯体形式障碍)的患者中,最常见的躯体症状是“睡眠困难”、“感到疲倦或精力不足”以及消化系统症状。在荟萃分析中,女性在14项中的3项得分显著高于男性:“头痛”(比值比[OR] 2.16, p<.001)、“头晕”(比值比[OR] 1.58, p<.001)和“胃痛”(比值比[OR] 1.46, p<.02),这些差异的效应大小为小到中等。结论:在三个项目(头痛、头晕和胃痛)中发现了性别差异,尽管这些差异的幅度很小。需要进一步的研究来更好地理解单个项目和其他社会人口变量之间的关系。此外,还需要更多的研究来确定不同人口群体的测量不变性。提供结构化的摘要,如适用,包括:背景;objetives;数据来源;研究资格标准、参与者和干预措施;研究评价与综合方法;结果;限制;结论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Factor structure and reliability of the Lasher and Faulkender’s Anxiety about Aging Scale in Mexican adults Ansiedad precompetitiva y habilidades psicológicas relacionadas con el rendimiento deportivo How to evaluate coping strategies for stressful situations? Validation of the CSI in a Spanish university population Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Ansiedad Social para Adultos (CASO) en población Dominicana Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de Abusos Sexuales Infantiles en personas adultas con adicción
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1