Construcción y validación de la Escala de Afrontamiento de la Ansiedad durante los Exámenes

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5093/anyes2022a9
Luis Rojas-Torres, L. Furlán, J. Sánchez-Rosas, R. M. Hernández, G. Rojas-Rojas
{"title":"Construcción y validación de la Escala de Afrontamiento de la Ansiedad durante los Exámenes","authors":"Luis Rojas-Torres, L. Furlán, J. Sánchez-Rosas, R. M. Hernández, G. Rojas-Rojas","doi":"10.5093/anyes2022a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"evidencias de validez favorables mediante análisis de jueces, análisis de ecuaciones estructurales, diferencias según género y correlaciones parciales con ansiedad ante los exámenes. Se concluyó que la esca- la propuesta es apropiada para medir el afrontamiento de la ansiedad durante exámenes. Coping strategies are a useful tool to regulate the anxiety experienced in evaluative situations. Based on that, the objective of this study was to develop a scale to measure the use of strategies in order to cope anxiety during tests, delimiting those which allow to continue solving the test. The developed ins- trument was applied to 184 people (101 women, 82 men and 1 unidentified person with these categories (Mage = 17.27, SD = 0.70) and it considered the experiences in the admission test to a University. The Ex- ploratory Structural Equation Modeling showed a three-factor structure, which represented the strategies: acceptance, putting into perspective and active coping. Each factor defined a subscale, which presented evidence of reliability: acceptable internal consistencies and significant test-retest correlations. Favorable evidence of validity was provided through the analysis of experts, structural equation analysis, gender di- fferences, and partial correlations with test anxiety. It was concluded that the proposed scale is suitable to measure the coping with during tests.","PeriodicalId":45616,"journal":{"name":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2022a9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

evidencias de validez favorables mediante análisis de jueces, análisis de ecuaciones estructurales, diferencias según género y correlaciones parciales con ansiedad ante los exámenes. Se concluyó que la esca- la propuesta es apropiada para medir el afrontamiento de la ansiedad durante exámenes. Coping strategies are a useful tool to regulate the anxiety experienced in evaluative situations. Based on that, the objective of this study was to develop a scale to measure the use of strategies in order to cope anxiety during tests, delimiting those which allow to continue solving the test. The developed ins- trument was applied to 184 people (101 women, 82 men and 1 unidentified person with these categories (Mage = 17.27, SD = 0.70) and it considered the experiences in the admission test to a University. The Ex- ploratory Structural Equation Modeling showed a three-factor structure, which represented the strategies: acceptance, putting into perspective and active coping. Each factor defined a subscale, which presented evidence of reliability: acceptable internal consistencies and significant test-retest correlations. Favorable evidence of validity was provided through the analysis of experts, structural equation analysis, gender di- fferences, and partial correlations with test anxiety. It was concluded that the proposed scale is suitable to measure the coping with during tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考试焦虑应对量表的构建与验证
有利的中间证据análisis从角度看,análisis从结构上看,差异según从相关的角度看,特别的证据exámenes。请查阅concluyó -请查阅有关资料-请查阅有关资料-请查阅资料-请查阅资料-请查阅资料-请查阅资料-请查阅资料exámenes。应对策略是一种有效的工具,可以调节评估情境中的焦虑体验。在此基础上,本研究的目的是制定一个量表来衡量在考试中应对焦虑的策略的使用,划定那些允许继续解决考试的策略。开发的内部工具应用于184人(101名女性,82名男性和1名身份不明的人),这些类别(Mage = 17.27, SD = 0.70),它考虑了大学入学考试中的经历。探索性结构方程模型显示了一个三因素结构,分别代表了接受策略、正视策略和积极应对策略。每个因素定义了一个子量表,它提供了可靠性的证据:可接受的内部一致性和显著的测试-重测相关性。通过专家分析、结构方程分析、性别差异以及与考试焦虑的部分相关,提供了良好的效度证据。结果表明,该量表适用于测试过程中应对能力的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Factor structure and reliability of the Lasher and Faulkender’s Anxiety about Aging Scale in Mexican adults Ansiedad precompetitiva y habilidades psicológicas relacionadas con el rendimiento deportivo How to evaluate coping strategies for stressful situations? Validation of the CSI in a Spanish university population Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Ansiedad Social para Adultos (CASO) en población Dominicana Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de Abusos Sexuales Infantiles en personas adultas con adicción
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1