{"title":"Build mutant and build homology protein structure predictions for indonesian avian influenza neuraminidase","authors":"S. Herlambang, R. Saleh","doi":"10.4236/JBPC.2012.32020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protein structure modeling using a homologous template is one of many routines that accompany the molecular dynamics simulation for biological material. There are currently two protocols of protein modeling available in Accelrys Discovery Studio 2.1, Build Mutants and Build Homology Modeling protocols. Both are template-based modeling, but with a different process. In this study, two different templates, 3CKZ and 274Y, have been used to see how much the differences will be made by those two protocols if the templates has significant percentage of identity. Evaluation of structure models has been performed using DOPE score, 3D-profile, and PROCHECK. The results indicated that Build Mutants Protocols produces more stable structures but has a low reliability values and low quality of stereochemistry when using a template that has a lower percentage of identity. The results also yield more stable, reliable, and higher percentage of residues in most favoured and additionally allowed region for the usage of Build Homology Modeling Protocol on both templates. These observations suggest that Build Homology Modeling protocol is recommended for protein modeling.","PeriodicalId":62927,"journal":{"name":"生物物理化学(英文)","volume":"3 1","pages":"183-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生物物理化学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JBPC.2012.32020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Protein structure modeling using a homologous template is one of many routines that accompany the molecular dynamics simulation for biological material. There are currently two protocols of protein modeling available in Accelrys Discovery Studio 2.1, Build Mutants and Build Homology Modeling protocols. Both are template-based modeling, but with a different process. In this study, two different templates, 3CKZ and 274Y, have been used to see how much the differences will be made by those two protocols if the templates has significant percentage of identity. Evaluation of structure models has been performed using DOPE score, 3D-profile, and PROCHECK. The results indicated that Build Mutants Protocols produces more stable structures but has a low reliability values and low quality of stereochemistry when using a template that has a lower percentage of identity. The results also yield more stable, reliable, and higher percentage of residues in most favoured and additionally allowed region for the usage of Build Homology Modeling Protocol on both templates. These observations suggest that Build Homology Modeling protocol is recommended for protein modeling.
使用同源模板的蛋白质结构建模是伴随生物材料分子动力学模拟的许多例程之一。目前在Accelrys Discovery Studio 2.1中有两种蛋白质建模协议,构建突变体和构建同源建模协议。两者都是基于模板的建模,但是过程不同。在本研究中,使用了两个不同的模板,3CKZ和274Y,以查看如果模板具有显著的身份百分比,这两个协议将产生多大的差异。使用DOPE评分、3D-profile和PROCHECK对结构模型进行了评估。结果表明,构建突变体协议产生更稳定的结构,但具有较低的可靠性值和低的立体化学质量,当使用的模板具有较低的同一性百分比。结果还产生了更稳定、可靠和更高的残基百分比,在最有利的区域和额外允许的区域,在两个模板上使用构建同源建模协议。这些观察结果表明,构建同源建模协议是推荐的蛋白质建模。