On the Noise Levels in Nursery, Primary and Secondary Schools in Jalingo, Taraba State: Are they in Conformity with the Standards?

Maxwell Obia Kanu, G. W. Joseph, T. V. Targema, Danladi Andenyangnde, Iliyasu Dawaki Mohammed
{"title":"On the Noise Levels in Nursery, Primary and Secondary Schools in Jalingo, Taraba State: Are they in Conformity with the Standards?","authors":"Maxwell Obia Kanu, G. W. Joseph, T. V. Targema, Danladi Andenyangnde, Iliyasu Dawaki Mohammed","doi":"10.47743/pesd2022162008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": There are limits recommended for environmental noise and occupational noise by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Standardization Organization (ISO). Therefore, noise levels were assessed in four different schools in Jalingo, the capital of Taraba State using a Lutron sound level meter, model SL – 4030. The aim of the study was to compare noise levels in the schools with the limits recommended by WHO and ISO, so as to make appropriate recommendations in case of undesirable results. The ANOVA statistical tool was used to demonstrate that the noise levels differ in the classrooms and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) statistics was used to show the significance of the variation of noise levels in the classrooms as suggested by the ANOVA. The mean equivalent noise levels (Leq (dB(A)) varied considerably above WHO recommended limits in classrooms. In the classrooms across all the schools, noise levels were within satisfactory range (61 – 75 dB(A)). This range however, exceeds the recommended noise limits in classrooms (35 – 55 dB(A)). Meanwhile, the control sample locations had mean noise level within the good range (41 – 60 dB(A)). It was also observed that at the control sites, mean noise levels were within the range recommended for classrooms during lessons. Higher noise levels than the endorsed limits by the WHO in the classrooms across all the schools are justifiable by so many factors such as: proximity to busy roads, students – Teacher’s activities and perhaps some acoustical reasons. Interestingly, the control of noise pollution in these schools to meet the international recommended standards is much possible if the recommendations from this study are obeyed.","PeriodicalId":42850,"journal":{"name":"Present Environment and Sustainable Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Present Environment and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/pesd2022162008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: There are limits recommended for environmental noise and occupational noise by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Standardization Organization (ISO). Therefore, noise levels were assessed in four different schools in Jalingo, the capital of Taraba State using a Lutron sound level meter, model SL – 4030. The aim of the study was to compare noise levels in the schools with the limits recommended by WHO and ISO, so as to make appropriate recommendations in case of undesirable results. The ANOVA statistical tool was used to demonstrate that the noise levels differ in the classrooms and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) statistics was used to show the significance of the variation of noise levels in the classrooms as suggested by the ANOVA. The mean equivalent noise levels (Leq (dB(A)) varied considerably above WHO recommended limits in classrooms. In the classrooms across all the schools, noise levels were within satisfactory range (61 – 75 dB(A)). This range however, exceeds the recommended noise limits in classrooms (35 – 55 dB(A)). Meanwhile, the control sample locations had mean noise level within the good range (41 – 60 dB(A)). It was also observed that at the control sites, mean noise levels were within the range recommended for classrooms during lessons. Higher noise levels than the endorsed limits by the WHO in the classrooms across all the schools are justifiable by so many factors such as: proximity to busy roads, students – Teacher’s activities and perhaps some acoustical reasons. Interestingly, the control of noise pollution in these schools to meet the international recommended standards is much possible if the recommendations from this study are obeyed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于塔拉巴州Jalingo幼儿园、小学和中学的噪音水平:它们是否符合标准?
:世界卫生组织(世卫组织)和国际标准化组织(ISO)对环境噪音和职业噪音都有建议的限值。因此,使用Lutron SL - 4030型声级计对塔拉巴州首府Jalingo的四所不同学校的噪声水平进行了评估。研究的目的是比较学校的噪音水平与世界卫生组织和国际标准化组织建议的限度,以便在不理想的情况下提出适当的建议。使用方差分析统计工具来证明教室中噪音水平的差异,并使用最小显著差异(LSD)统计来显示教室中噪音水平变化的显著性,如方差分析所示。教室内的平均等效噪声水平(Leq (dB(A))大大高于世卫组织建议的限值。在所有学校的教室中,噪音水平在令人满意的范围内(61 - 75分贝(A))。然而,这个范围超过了建议的教室噪音限制(35 - 55分贝(A))。同时,对照样本位置的平均噪声水平在良好的范围内(41 ~ 60 dB(A))。还观察到,在对照地点,平均噪音水平在课堂上的建议范围内。在所有学校的教室中,比世界卫生组织认可的限制更高的噪音水平是合理的,因为有很多因素,例如:靠近繁忙的道路,学生-教师的活动,也许还有一些声学原因。有趣的是,如果遵循本研究的建议,这些学校的噪音污染控制达到国际推荐标准是很有可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
3
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of leadership actions for Environmental Stewardship Enhancement in public schools The use of spectral techniques to monitor the vegetation status in a protected area in the Iasi county Sand winds effect on the degradation of photovoltaic modules in desert environments - PART I: Simulator design and Database creating Quantitative tools to assess climatic impact on energy consumption. Case study: Bucharest town area Walking where men walk: gendered politics of smallholder agriculture in Zimbabwe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1