Teaching Styles Pattern: A Survey of Mathematics Teacher's Preferences in Primary School

IF 0.5 Q3 MATHEMATICS Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.47836/mjms.17.2.04
Mahmad
{"title":"Teaching Styles Pattern: A Survey of Mathematics Teacher's Preferences in Primary School","authors":"Mahmad","doi":"10.47836/mjms.17.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current wave of educational reforms, understanding teaching styles of mathematics can help modify strategies for effective teaching. This survey research which using quantitative approach was aimed to identify teaching styles pattern by primary school mathematics Year 5 teachers. The research population consists of 506 Year 5 mathematics teachers from Malacca primary school. A total of 217 mathematics teachers were randomly selected as respondents. Data were collected through a translated version of Grasha Teaching Style Inventory. Descriptive statistics were analyzing the finding. Statistical inference is used to analyze the difference in teaching style based on the teachers' background, which is gender and teaching experience. In direction of the data with means, frequencies, t-test and one way ANOVA; the formal authority is the dominant, which is for male year 5 mathematics teachers, while female mathematics teachers prefer to personal model teaching style. Meanwhile, formal authority was the highest means for teaching experience over 21 years. The was a statistically significant difference between the male and female teacher in delegator style. Likewise, there was a significant difference in teachers teaching style based on teaching experience in expert style and formal authority style. Teachers need to diversify teaching styles in teaching.","PeriodicalId":43645,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/mjms.17.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current wave of educational reforms, understanding teaching styles of mathematics can help modify strategies for effective teaching. This survey research which using quantitative approach was aimed to identify teaching styles pattern by primary school mathematics Year 5 teachers. The research population consists of 506 Year 5 mathematics teachers from Malacca primary school. A total of 217 mathematics teachers were randomly selected as respondents. Data were collected through a translated version of Grasha Teaching Style Inventory. Descriptive statistics were analyzing the finding. Statistical inference is used to analyze the difference in teaching style based on the teachers' background, which is gender and teaching experience. In direction of the data with means, frequencies, t-test and one way ANOVA; the formal authority is the dominant, which is for male year 5 mathematics teachers, while female mathematics teachers prefer to personal model teaching style. Meanwhile, formal authority was the highest means for teaching experience over 21 years. The was a statistically significant difference between the male and female teacher in delegator style. Likewise, there was a significant difference in teachers teaching style based on teaching experience in expert style and formal authority style. Teachers need to diversify teaching styles in teaching.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学风格模式:小学数学教师偏好调查
在当前的教育改革浪潮中,了解数学教学风格有助于调整教学策略,提高教学效果。本研究采用定量研究方法,对小学数学五年级教师的教学风格模式进行调查研究。研究对象为来自马六甲小学的506名五年级数学教师。随机抽取217名数学教师作为调查对象。数据通过翻译版的《格拉沙教学风格量表》收集。描述性统计分析了这一发现。采用统计推断法分析教师背景(性别、教学经验)对教学风格的影响。在数据方向上采用均值、频率、t检验和单因素方差分析;男五年级数学教师以形式权威为主,女五年级数学教师以个人模式教学为主。同时,正式权威是21年教学经验的最高手段。男女教师在委托方式上差异有统计学意义。同样,基于教学经验的教师教学风格在专家风格和正式权威风格上也存在显著差异。教师在教学中要实现教学风格的多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Research Bulletin of Institute for Mathematical Research (MathDigest) publishes light expository articles on mathematical sciences and research abstracts. It is published twice yearly by the Institute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia. MathDigest is targeted at mathematically informed general readers on research of interest to the Institute. Articles are sought by invitation to the members, visitors and friends of the Institute. MathDigest also includes abstracts of thesis by postgraduate students of the Institute.
期刊最新文献
Pricing Quanto Options in Renewable Energy Markets The Efficiency of Embedding-Based Attacks on the GGH Lattice-Based Cryptosystem A Study of Families of Bistar and Corona Product of Graph: Reverse Topological Indices Invariance Analysis and Closed-form Solutions for The Beam Equation in Timoshenko Model The Effect of GeoGebra Software on Achievement and Engagement Among Secondary School Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1