"Sometimes There is No Most-Vital" Arc: Assessing and Improving the Operational Resilience of Systems

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Military Operations Research Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI:10.5711/1082598318121
D. Alderson, Gerald G. Brown, W. Carlyle, L. Cox
{"title":"\"Sometimes There is No Most-Vital\" Arc: Assessing and Improving the Operational Resilience of Systems","authors":"D. Alderson, Gerald G. Brown, W. Carlyle, L. Cox","doi":"10.5711/1082598318121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : This paper shows that no simple common-sense rule of thumb can be used to identify a most-vital arc even in a simple maximum-flow problem. The correct answer requires analysis equivalent in difficulty to completely solving the maximum-flow problem, perhaps repeatedly. This insight generalizes to finding a most-vital component, or set of components in a system whose operation is described by a more general model. Our paper shows how to evaluate the criticality of sets of components, how to assess the worst-case set of components that might be lost to a given number of simultaneous hostile attacks (or engineering failures, or losses to Mother Nature), and how to allocate limited defensive resources to minimize the maximum damage from a subsequent attack. Collateral insights include the fact that there is no way to prioritize individual components by criticality, and that the analysis that determines critical component sets also yields objective assessments of operational system resilience and can provide constructive advice on how to increase it.","PeriodicalId":54242,"journal":{"name":"Military Operations Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"21-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5711/1082598318121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Abstract : This paper shows that no simple common-sense rule of thumb can be used to identify a most-vital arc even in a simple maximum-flow problem. The correct answer requires analysis equivalent in difficulty to completely solving the maximum-flow problem, perhaps repeatedly. This insight generalizes to finding a most-vital component, or set of components in a system whose operation is described by a more general model. Our paper shows how to evaluate the criticality of sets of components, how to assess the worst-case set of components that might be lost to a given number of simultaneous hostile attacks (or engineering failures, or losses to Mother Nature), and how to allocate limited defensive resources to minimize the maximum damage from a subsequent attack. Collateral insights include the fact that there is no way to prioritize individual components by criticality, and that the analysis that determines critical component sets also yields objective assessments of operational system resilience and can provide constructive advice on how to increase it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“有时没有最重要的”弧线:评估和改进系统的操作弹性
摘要:本文表明,即使在简单的最大流量问题中,也不能使用简单的常识规则来确定最重要的弧线。正确的答案需要完全解决最大流量问题的难度相等的分析,可能需要重复。这种见解可以推广到寻找系统中最重要的组件或组件集,其操作由更通用的模型描述。我们的论文展示了如何评估组件集的临界性,如何评估在给定数量的同时发生的敌对攻击(或工程故障,或对大自然的损失)中可能丢失的最坏情况组件集,以及如何分配有限的防御资源以最大限度地减少后续攻击的最大损害。附带的见解包括这样一个事实,即没有办法根据重要性来确定单个组件的优先级,并且确定关键组件集的分析也会产生对操作系统弹性的客观评估,并可以就如何增加它提供建设性的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Operations Research
Military Operations Research Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Military Operations Research is a peer-reviewed journal of high academic quality. The Journal publishes articles that describe operations research (OR) methodologies and theories used in key military and national security applications. Of particular interest are papers that present: Case studies showing innovative OR applications Apply OR to major policy issues Introduce interesting new problems areas Highlight education issues Document the history of military and national security OR.
期刊最新文献
A New Age in Conflict: A Statistical Analysis of the Maneuver Battle Lab’s 10x Combat Simulation Cloud Characterization with a Convolutional Neural Network Using Ground Weather Radar Scans Merging Future Knowledgebase System of Systems with Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Engines to Maximize Reliability and Availability for Decision Support Fog Computing Resource Management for Video Processing Using Evolutionary Bayesian Optimization and Nondeterministic Deep Reinforcement Learning Military Operations Research Society (MORS) Oral History Project Interview of Dr. Janet A. McLeavey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1