Weber's contribution to content analysis

Politeia Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5937/POLITEIA0-29393
Željka Manić
{"title":"Weber's contribution to content analysis","authors":"Željka Manić","doi":"10.5937/POLITEIA0-29393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this paper is Max Weber's contribution to content analysis as a sociological research procedure. Content analysis gained the legitimacy of the sociological method of research in the middle of the 20th century, and Weber occupies a significant place in its history. He used the basic idea of content analysis in \"The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism\" (1904-1905). Weber drew conclusions about the institutionalised form of social communication in the past by studying its recorded content. He analysed the content of protestant catechisms to establish whether, in working with believers, pastors encouraged ethical attitudes conducive to the development of the capitalistic spirit. Later, at the first meeting of the German Sociological Society (1910), Weber proposed undertaking a comprehensive analysis of the content of the press, which did not receive the support of sociologists. His proposal represents the first methodologically designed attempt to give content analysis a place among sociological research procedures. The aim of this paper is to present Weber's contribution to content analysis. His contribution is considered through an analysis of the application of the basic idea of this procedure in 'The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism' and through advocating its use in speech at the first meeting of the German Sociological Society.","PeriodicalId":32317,"journal":{"name":"Politeia","volume":"10 1","pages":"11-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politeia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/POLITEIA0-29393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of this paper is Max Weber's contribution to content analysis as a sociological research procedure. Content analysis gained the legitimacy of the sociological method of research in the middle of the 20th century, and Weber occupies a significant place in its history. He used the basic idea of content analysis in "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" (1904-1905). Weber drew conclusions about the institutionalised form of social communication in the past by studying its recorded content. He analysed the content of protestant catechisms to establish whether, in working with believers, pastors encouraged ethical attitudes conducive to the development of the capitalistic spirit. Later, at the first meeting of the German Sociological Society (1910), Weber proposed undertaking a comprehensive analysis of the content of the press, which did not receive the support of sociologists. His proposal represents the first methodologically designed attempt to give content analysis a place among sociological research procedures. The aim of this paper is to present Weber's contribution to content analysis. His contribution is considered through an analysis of the application of the basic idea of this procedure in 'The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism' and through advocating its use in speech at the first meeting of the German Sociological Society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韦伯对内容分析的贡献
本文的主题是马克斯·韦伯对作为社会学研究程序的内容分析的贡献。内容分析在20世纪中期获得了社会学研究方法的合法性,韦伯在其历史上占有重要地位。他在《新教伦理与资本主义精神》(1904-1905)中运用了内容分析的基本思想。韦伯通过研究其记录的内容,得出了关于过去社会传播的制度化形式的结论。他分析了新教教义问答的内容,以确定牧师在与信徒一起工作时,是否鼓励有利于资本主义精神发展的道德态度。后来,在德国社会学学会(1910)的第一次会议上,韦伯提出对报刊内容进行全面分析,但没有得到社会学家的支持。他的建议代表了第一个从方法论上设计的尝试,即在社会学研究程序中给予内容分析一个位置。本文的目的是介绍韦伯对内容分析的贡献。他的贡献是通过分析《新教伦理与资本主义精神》中这一程序的基本思想的应用,以及通过在德国社会学学会第一次会议上的演讲中提倡使用这一程序来考虑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interventions at the Local Spheres of Government in South Africa: An Assessment of Monitoring and Evaluation Performance of Women-led Political Parties in Lesotho’s 2022 National Elections Battle for the Bay Revisited: The 2021 South African Local Elections in the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality Autocratic Democracy and the Deficit of Human Rights in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic Main Predictor(s) of Good Corporate Governance in National Government Departments: A Decision-tree Classification and Prediction Analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1