Autonomy of higher education in the European Union: Case C-66/18 European Commission v. Hungary

Politeia Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5937/politeia0-31034
Radmila Dragišić
{"title":"Autonomy of higher education in the European Union: Case C-66/18 European Commission v. Hungary","authors":"Radmila Dragišić","doi":"10.5937/politeia0-31034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aware of the fact that autonomy is an important prerequisite for educational institutions to be able to perform their tasks, in this paper we explore and analyze one of the most interesting cases from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union in this area. Namely, the European Commission initiated proceedings against the Republic of Hungary for violating the rights of the European Union. The focus is on the Law on Higher Education of that member state, which has caused sharp controversies within the academic community in the countries of the European Economic Area, but also in third countries. Although the work is mostly dedicated to the free movement of services in the field of higher education, we inevitably explore the relationship between European Union law and legal instruments of the World Trade Organization (WTO), as well as the views of the Court of Justice regarding their interpretation. The case we are discussing is also important for the status of countries aspiring to become members of the European organization, since the European Parliament adopted a recommendation to include in the Copenhagen criteria for accession the defense and protection of academic freedom and institutional autonomy in order to prevent their endangerment in member states.","PeriodicalId":32317,"journal":{"name":"Politeia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politeia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/politeia0-31034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aware of the fact that autonomy is an important prerequisite for educational institutions to be able to perform their tasks, in this paper we explore and analyze one of the most interesting cases from the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union in this area. Namely, the European Commission initiated proceedings against the Republic of Hungary for violating the rights of the European Union. The focus is on the Law on Higher Education of that member state, which has caused sharp controversies within the academic community in the countries of the European Economic Area, but also in third countries. Although the work is mostly dedicated to the free movement of services in the field of higher education, we inevitably explore the relationship between European Union law and legal instruments of the World Trade Organization (WTO), as well as the views of the Court of Justice regarding their interpretation. The case we are discussing is also important for the status of countries aspiring to become members of the European organization, since the European Parliament adopted a recommendation to include in the Copenhagen criteria for accession the defense and protection of academic freedom and institutional autonomy in order to prevent their endangerment in member states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟高等教育自治:案例C-66/18欧盟委员会诉匈牙利
意识到自治是教育机构能够履行其任务的重要先决条件,在本文中,我们探索和分析了欧盟法院在这一领域的法理中最有趣的案例之一。也就是说,欧洲委员会以侵犯欧洲联盟的权利为由对匈牙利共和国提起诉讼。重点是该成员国的高等教育法,这在欧洲经济区国家以及第三国的学术界引起了激烈的争议。虽然工作主要是致力于高等教育领域服务的自由流动,但我们不可避免地探讨了欧盟法律与世界贸易组织(WTO)法律文书之间的关系,以及法院对其解释的看法。我们正在讨论的案例对于渴望成为欧洲组织成员的国家的地位也很重要,因为欧洲议会通过了一项建议,将捍卫和保护学术自由和机构自治纳入哥本哈根加入标准,以防止它们在成员国中受到危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interventions at the Local Spheres of Government in South Africa: An Assessment of Monitoring and Evaluation Performance of Women-led Political Parties in Lesotho’s 2022 National Elections Battle for the Bay Revisited: The 2021 South African Local Elections in the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality Autocratic Democracy and the Deficit of Human Rights in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic Main Predictor(s) of Good Corporate Governance in National Government Departments: A Decision-tree Classification and Prediction Analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1