Beyond the Band of Brothers: The US Military and the Myth That Women Can't Fight

Q3 Arts and Humanities Parameters Pub Date : 2015-12-22 DOI:10.5860/choice.194006
Ellen L. Haring
{"title":"Beyond the Band of Brothers: The US Military and the Myth That Women Can't Fight","authors":"Ellen L. Haring","doi":"10.5860/choice.194006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beyond the Band of Brothers: The US Military and the Myth that Women Can't Fight By Megan MacKenzie Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 200 pages, $28.000 [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Mr. Megan MacKenzie's newest book, Beyond the Band of Brothers, argues the exclusion of women from combat positions is rooted in ideas of male essentialism that are based on a myth. She convincingly debunks the notion \"the precious and indefinable band of brothers effect so essential to winning in close combat would be irreparably compromised within mixed-gender infantry squads.\" According to MacKenzie, when General Scales asserts that all of \"our senior ground-force leaders, as well as generations of former close combat veterans from all of our previous wars, are virtually united on one point,\" namely, that combat units would be \"irreparably compromised\" by women, what he is admitting is they have all been duped by a myth of their own making. MacKenzie begins with a historical analysis of the establishment of the \"band of brothers\" myth. Originally a literary creation of Shakespeare subsequently perpetuated by Darwin and Freud (though Freud admitted it was not intended to be taken seriously), it became a commonly accepted, rarely questioned, \"truth\" about the nature of male-only bonding. MacKenzie shows how this myth subsequently informed and sustained laws and later military policies regarding servicewomen's suitability for combat positions. Ultimately, women's exclusion had nothing to do with women's actual ability to fight; rather, it had everything to do with men protecting their position as exceptional, essential, and elite. She begins by chronicling the path to how we arrived at such a policy, and how it was sustained, even as evidence mounted showing women could, and were indeed successfully integrating in fighting units. MacKenzie details the depth of the self-deception the US military engaged in, most obviously after 9/11 as it prosecuted two wars with a growing number of women in ever-expanding roles. What made the exclusion policy increasingly untenable was the way military commanders themselves circumvented the policy to accomplish their missions. For example, co-location restrictions were violated almost from the outset, while the practice of \"attaching,\" (in order to avoid rules that forbade \"assigning\") women to direct ground combat units became commonplace. …","PeriodicalId":35242,"journal":{"name":"Parameters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parameters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.194006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Beyond the Band of Brothers: The US Military and the Myth that Women Can't Fight By Megan MacKenzie Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 200 pages, $28.000 [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Mr. Megan MacKenzie's newest book, Beyond the Band of Brothers, argues the exclusion of women from combat positions is rooted in ideas of male essentialism that are based on a myth. She convincingly debunks the notion "the precious and indefinable band of brothers effect so essential to winning in close combat would be irreparably compromised within mixed-gender infantry squads." According to MacKenzie, when General Scales asserts that all of "our senior ground-force leaders, as well as generations of former close combat veterans from all of our previous wars, are virtually united on one point," namely, that combat units would be "irreparably compromised" by women, what he is admitting is they have all been duped by a myth of their own making. MacKenzie begins with a historical analysis of the establishment of the "band of brothers" myth. Originally a literary creation of Shakespeare subsequently perpetuated by Darwin and Freud (though Freud admitted it was not intended to be taken seriously), it became a commonly accepted, rarely questioned, "truth" about the nature of male-only bonding. MacKenzie shows how this myth subsequently informed and sustained laws and later military policies regarding servicewomen's suitability for combat positions. Ultimately, women's exclusion had nothing to do with women's actual ability to fight; rather, it had everything to do with men protecting their position as exceptional, essential, and elite. She begins by chronicling the path to how we arrived at such a policy, and how it was sustained, even as evidence mounted showing women could, and were indeed successfully integrating in fighting units. MacKenzie details the depth of the self-deception the US military engaged in, most obviously after 9/11 as it prosecuted two wars with a growing number of women in ever-expanding roles. What made the exclusion policy increasingly untenable was the way military commanders themselves circumvented the policy to accomplish their missions. For example, co-location restrictions were violated almost from the outset, while the practice of "attaching," (in order to avoid rules that forbade "assigning") women to direct ground combat units became commonplace. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越兄弟连:美国军队和女人不会打仗的神话
梅根·麦肯齐的新书《超越兄弟连:美国军队与女性不能战斗的神话》,剑桥大学出版社,2015年,200页,28000美元【插图遗漏】梅根·麦肯齐先生的新书《超越兄弟连》认为,将女性排除在战斗岗位之外的根源在于基于神话的男性本质主义思想。她令人信服地驳斥了这样一种观点:“在近距离战斗中,宝贵而难以形容的兄弟效应对胜利至关重要,但在男女混合的步兵班中,这种效应将不可挽回地受到损害。”根据麦肯齐的说法,当斯凯尔斯将军断言所有“我们的高级地面部队领导人,以及几代前近距离战斗退伍军人,实际上在一点上是一致的”,即战斗部队将被女性“不可挽回地损害”时,他承认的是,她们都被自己制造的神话所欺骗。麦肯齐首先对“兄弟团”神话的形成进行了历史分析。它最初是莎士比亚的文学创作,后来被达尔文和弗洛伊德延续了下来(尽管弗洛伊德承认它并没有被认真对待),它成为一个被普遍接受的、很少被质疑的关于男性关系本质的“真理”。麦肯齐展示了这个神话后来是如何影响和维持了有关女兵是否适合战斗岗位的法律和后来的军事政策的。最终,女性被排斥与女性的实际战斗能力无关;相反,这一切都与男性保护自己的特殊、重要和精英地位有关。她首先记录了我们如何制定这样一项政策的过程,以及它是如何持续下去的,尽管越来越多的证据表明,女性可以,而且确实成功地融入了战斗部队。麦肯齐详细描述了美国军方自欺欺人的深度,最明显的是在9/11之后,美国发动了两场战争,越来越多的女性扮演着越来越重要的角色。使排斥政策越来越站不住脚的是军事指挥官自己绕过政策来完成任务的方式。例如,几乎从一开始就违反了共处一地的限制,而“指派”(为了避免禁止“指派”的规定)女性指挥地面作战部队的做法变得司空见惯。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parameters
Parameters Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Was the Russian Invasion of Ukraine a Failure of Western Deterrence? Contributor's Guidelines From the Editor in Chief Ukraine’s Lessons for Future Combat: Unmanned Aerial Systems and Deep Strike Parameters 2023-24 Winter Demi-Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1