Parliamentary representation of national minorities in Serbia and Hungary: Mechanism for effective participation of minorities, or tool for political manipulation?

Q4 Social Sciences Pravni Zapisi Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5937/pravzap0-40672
Tamás Korhecz
{"title":"Parliamentary representation of national minorities in Serbia and Hungary: Mechanism for effective participation of minorities, or tool for political manipulation?","authors":"Tamás Korhecz","doi":"10.5937/pravzap0-40672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In multiethnic states, in which numerically large national, ethnic or linguistic minorities exist with a strong distinct identity, the principle of democracy requires that these groups have representatives in parliaments. However, in many multiethnic states the national-ethnic majority makes efforts to exclude or minimize the representation of minority national-ethnic groups in legislative bodies. Serbia and Hungary are nation states with relatively high percentage of citizens belonging to national-ethnic minorities, and with developed systems of the protection of minority rights. Both states enacted electoral laws facilitating the representation of national minorities in highest elected state bodies. This article describes, critically analyzes and compares the electoral rules and their practical implementation in both states, in order to answer the question whether these rules make it efficiently possible for national minorities to acquire proper representation in parliament. In order to answer this question, the results and experiences of the latest parliamentary elections - organized in 2022 in both states - will be elaborated as well.","PeriodicalId":53056,"journal":{"name":"Pravni Zapisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravni Zapisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-40672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In multiethnic states, in which numerically large national, ethnic or linguistic minorities exist with a strong distinct identity, the principle of democracy requires that these groups have representatives in parliaments. However, in many multiethnic states the national-ethnic majority makes efforts to exclude or minimize the representation of minority national-ethnic groups in legislative bodies. Serbia and Hungary are nation states with relatively high percentage of citizens belonging to national-ethnic minorities, and with developed systems of the protection of minority rights. Both states enacted electoral laws facilitating the representation of national minorities in highest elected state bodies. This article describes, critically analyzes and compares the electoral rules and their practical implementation in both states, in order to answer the question whether these rules make it efficiently possible for national minorities to acquire proper representation in parliament. In order to answer this question, the results and experiences of the latest parliamentary elections - organized in 2022 in both states - will be elaborated as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞尔维亚和匈牙利的少数民族议会代表权:少数民族有效参与的机制,还是政治操纵的工具?
在多民族国家中,数量庞大的民族、族裔或语言上的少数群体以强烈的独特身份存在,民主原则要求这些群体在议会中有代表。然而,在许多多民族国家,多数民族努力排除或尽量减少少数民族在立法机构中的代表性。塞尔维亚和匈牙利都是少数民族国家,属于少数民族的公民比例相对较高,保护少数民族权利的制度也比较发达。这两个州都颁布了选举法,促进少数民族在民选的最高国家机构中的代表性。本文描述,批判性地分析和比较选举规则及其在两个州的实际实施,以回答这些规则是否使少数民族在议会中获得适当代表权有效的问题。为了回答这个问题,本文还将详细阐述这两个邦在2022年举行的最近一次议会选举的结果和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pravni Zapisi
Pravni Zapisi Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The investor-state arbitration legitimacy crisis: Could AI be its future savior (or resurrector)? How much for a legal intern?: Internships at law offices in Serbia Impunity (or not) for civil disobedience Protection of the rights of persons with disabilities to work: Kazakhstan's experience from the perspective of international law and EU law Who is an online trader from the consumer law perspective?: From Serbia to the EU and back
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1