The fissures of the nation: tensions and political-religious readings on the conquest of America in the 18th century

Q3 Arts and Humanities Rubrica Contemporanea Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.5565/rev/rubrica.195
Nuria Soriano Muñoz
{"title":"The fissures of the nation: tensions and political-religious readings on the conquest of America in the 18th century","authors":"Nuria Soriano Muñoz","doi":"10.5565/rev/rubrica.195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conquest of the Americas generated a remarkable number of epic discourses of a political and literary nature; these contributed to the reinforcement of imperial, religious and patriotic commonplaces. Concerned about the country’s having a negative image abroad, the political and intellectual elites at the service of Charles III and Charles IV fomented a defence of the conquistadores, despite the diffusion of a tangible current within European public opinion that was critical of military heroism. Within the framework of Bourbon reformism, I reconstruct groups and individuals who, from very different places and positions, enabled the success of this preponderant discourse, which underlined the close collaboration between the crown and the clergy. In addition to emphasizing the lack of transparency with which the conquest was commemorated, especially in the hands of clergymen, priests and missionaries, I analyse how the consolidation of this patriotic discourse collided with other, alternative interpretations that cast doubt on it. These latter interpretations, driven by the notions of critique, civilization and Enlightenment sensitivity –from a mournful attitude, full of regrets and frustration– allow us to question the stability of discourses about the Americas from both inside and outside the empire.","PeriodicalId":36376,"journal":{"name":"Rubrica Contemporanea","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rubrica Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/rubrica.195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conquest of the Americas generated a remarkable number of epic discourses of a political and literary nature; these contributed to the reinforcement of imperial, religious and patriotic commonplaces. Concerned about the country’s having a negative image abroad, the political and intellectual elites at the service of Charles III and Charles IV fomented a defence of the conquistadores, despite the diffusion of a tangible current within European public opinion that was critical of military heroism. Within the framework of Bourbon reformism, I reconstruct groups and individuals who, from very different places and positions, enabled the success of this preponderant discourse, which underlined the close collaboration between the crown and the clergy. In addition to emphasizing the lack of transparency with which the conquest was commemorated, especially in the hands of clergymen, priests and missionaries, I analyse how the consolidation of this patriotic discourse collided with other, alternative interpretations that cast doubt on it. These latter interpretations, driven by the notions of critique, civilization and Enlightenment sensitivity –from a mournful attitude, full of regrets and frustration– allow us to question the stability of discourses about the Americas from both inside and outside the empire.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家的裂痕:18世纪征服美洲的紧张局势和政治宗教解读
对美洲的征服产生了大量具有政治和文学性质的史诗话语;这些都加强了帝国主义、宗教和爱国主义的俗套。由于担心国家在国外的负面形象,为查理三世和查理四世服务的政治和知识精英煽动了对征服者的辩护,尽管在欧洲公众舆论中弥漫着批评军事英雄主义的切实潮流。在波旁改革主义的框架内,我重构了一些团体和个人,他们来自不同的地方和位置,使这种优势话语得以成功,这强调了国王和神职人员之间的密切合作。除了强调征服的纪念缺乏透明度,特别是在牧师、牧师和传教士的手中,我还分析了这种爱国话语的巩固如何与其他产生怀疑的其他解释相冲突。这些后一种解释,由批判、文明和启蒙敏感的概念驱动——从一种悲伤的态度,充满遗憾和沮丧——允许我们从帝国内外质疑关于美洲的话语的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rubrica Contemporanea
Rubrica Contemporanea Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Introduccción. Un tren historiográfico en la conmemoración trienista: soslayo de debate, tormenta de estudios y emergencia de América Junín y Ayacucho "fake news": la prensa ibérica contra la realidad (1824-1825) Los incorregibles del sistema penitenciario liberal en España y Portugal (1870-1930) Rafael de Castillo Cuesta y la Guerra de África (1859-1860): al servicio de la nacionalización de la Unión Liberal ¿Más Ayacucho que Trocadero? La sorprendente vía historiográfica americanista para comprender globalmente un largo bicentenario "Trienista"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1