[Challenging Territory: The Writing of Margaret Laurence]

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.35-1964
Susan J. Warwick, C. Riegel
{"title":"[Challenging Territory: The Writing of Margaret Laurence]","authors":"Susan J. Warwick, C. Riegel","doi":"10.5860/choice.35-1964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 1997.When Shakespeare's Juliet asked \"what's in a name?\" she entered a long and continuing conversation about the relationship between words and the world, about the self, identity and representation. In a postscript to a letter written in January 1961, Margaret Laurence asks her lifelong friend, Adele Wiseman, \"did I tell you - I've changed my name to Margaret?\" Named Jean Margaret by her parents, Laurence was known in her early years as Peggy, and it is this name that she forsakes in her letter to Wiseman claiming that \"it was Peggy I hated, so I have killed her off (I hope)\" (Lennox and Panofsky 129). Margaret Laurence, of course, was the name under which her first novel, This Side Jordan, had appeared in 1960, and it is the name under which all her subsequent work was published, work that justly earned Laurence respect and acknowledgement as one of Canada's foremost and accomplished writers. In The Life of Margaret Laurence, James King reflects on this postscript, first asking \"why did Margaret 'kill off' Peggy?\" then answering that \"Peggy was the girl she had been, whereas Margaret was the woman she aspired to be\" (151). While King sees this transition as \"sudden and violent, almost as if a change in personality would follow a change in name\" (Ibid.), the disjuncture between the two is subtly qualified by Laurence's parenthetical \"I hope.\" The name Margaret Laurence may have been adopted, but the relinquishing of all that had gone before was clearly not possible.Reading through the list of the above titles, it is this name, Margaret Laurence, that emerges as the constant element, and, in the language of the library catalogue, as the main subject of this review. But, as is always the case with any search for a subject, these eight works reveal that the ostensibly singular subject with which one begins cannot finally be apprehended or discerned in any single or uniform manner. Given the emphasis in literary theory and criticism over the past several decades on notions of plurality, multiplicity, heterogeneity and difference, to note that the writings of Margaret Laurence have been approached and interpreted in diverse ways may seem mundane, even unnecessary. However, the writings of Margaret Laurence are not all that is located under the main subject heading here. There is also the person who bore the name Margaret Laurence, and the life that she led. In this collection of recent works on the subject of Margaret Laurence we accordingly find two collections of essays on Laurence's writing, two works offering comparative discussion of Laurence alongside another writer, a structuralist reading of two of Laurence's Manawaka novels, two letter collections and a biography.Names and identity, subjects and subjectivity have received much critical scrutiny of late, and I introduce these issues at the outset of this review both to foreground the concerns this scrutiny has raised, and to suggest that they are of particular relevance in considering the life and work of Margaret Laurence. Much literary study of the past several decades has addressed important questions about the relations between a writer, the writer's life in the world, the world and the works written. All of these recent studies of Margaret Laurence consider, to varying degrees, these relations and questions. If an earlier critical orthodoxy argued that the literary work should be approached as autonomous and self-contained, as separate from the historical and biographical circumstances of its creation, the impelling force behind much recent literary analysis has been the urge to return the work to the context in which it was produced and received. This return, however, has not supported the reappearance of an understanding of history, of a period or a life, as simply background, or as the ground upon which an author's intentions and meanings can be fixed. Instead, the literary text increasingly has come to be understood as a form of discourse that interacts with and is shaped by other discourses and practices in specific historical moments. …","PeriodicalId":45057,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-1964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 1997.When Shakespeare's Juliet asked "what's in a name?" she entered a long and continuing conversation about the relationship between words and the world, about the self, identity and representation. In a postscript to a letter written in January 1961, Margaret Laurence asks her lifelong friend, Adele Wiseman, "did I tell you - I've changed my name to Margaret?" Named Jean Margaret by her parents, Laurence was known in her early years as Peggy, and it is this name that she forsakes in her letter to Wiseman claiming that "it was Peggy I hated, so I have killed her off (I hope)" (Lennox and Panofsky 129). Margaret Laurence, of course, was the name under which her first novel, This Side Jordan, had appeared in 1960, and it is the name under which all her subsequent work was published, work that justly earned Laurence respect and acknowledgement as one of Canada's foremost and accomplished writers. In The Life of Margaret Laurence, James King reflects on this postscript, first asking "why did Margaret 'kill off' Peggy?" then answering that "Peggy was the girl she had been, whereas Margaret was the woman she aspired to be" (151). While King sees this transition as "sudden and violent, almost as if a change in personality would follow a change in name" (Ibid.), the disjuncture between the two is subtly qualified by Laurence's parenthetical "I hope." The name Margaret Laurence may have been adopted, but the relinquishing of all that had gone before was clearly not possible.Reading through the list of the above titles, it is this name, Margaret Laurence, that emerges as the constant element, and, in the language of the library catalogue, as the main subject of this review. But, as is always the case with any search for a subject, these eight works reveal that the ostensibly singular subject with which one begins cannot finally be apprehended or discerned in any single or uniform manner. Given the emphasis in literary theory and criticism over the past several decades on notions of plurality, multiplicity, heterogeneity and difference, to note that the writings of Margaret Laurence have been approached and interpreted in diverse ways may seem mundane, even unnecessary. However, the writings of Margaret Laurence are not all that is located under the main subject heading here. There is also the person who bore the name Margaret Laurence, and the life that she led. In this collection of recent works on the subject of Margaret Laurence we accordingly find two collections of essays on Laurence's writing, two works offering comparative discussion of Laurence alongside another writer, a structuralist reading of two of Laurence's Manawaka novels, two letter collections and a biography.Names and identity, subjects and subjectivity have received much critical scrutiny of late, and I introduce these issues at the outset of this review both to foreground the concerns this scrutiny has raised, and to suggest that they are of particular relevance in considering the life and work of Margaret Laurence. Much literary study of the past several decades has addressed important questions about the relations between a writer, the writer's life in the world, the world and the works written. All of these recent studies of Margaret Laurence consider, to varying degrees, these relations and questions. If an earlier critical orthodoxy argued that the literary work should be approached as autonomous and self-contained, as separate from the historical and biographical circumstances of its creation, the impelling force behind much recent literary analysis has been the urge to return the work to the context in which it was produced and received. This return, however, has not supported the reappearance of an understanding of history, of a period or a life, as simply background, or as the ground upon which an author's intentions and meanings can be fixed. Instead, the literary text increasingly has come to be understood as a form of discourse that interacts with and is shaped by other discourses and practices in specific historical moments. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《挑战的领域:玛格丽特·劳伦斯的写作》
埃德蒙顿:阿尔伯塔大学出版社,1997。当莎士比亚的朱丽叶问“名字里有什么”时,她开始了一场关于文字与世界、自我、身份和表现之间关系的漫长而持续的对话。在1961年1月写的一封信的附言中,玛格丽特·劳伦斯问她一生的朋友阿黛尔·怀斯曼:“我告诉过你吗——我已经改名为玛格丽特了?”劳伦斯的父母给她起名叫简·玛格丽特(Jean Margaret),早年叫她佩吉(Peggy),她在给怀斯曼的信中放弃了这个名字,声称“我讨厌佩吉,所以我把她杀了(我希望)”。(Lennox and Panofsky, 129)。当然,玛格丽特·劳伦斯是她在1960年出版的第一部小说《约旦这边》的名字,也是她后来出版的所有作品的名字,这些作品为劳伦斯赢得了加拿大最重要、最成功的作家之一的尊重和认可。在《玛格丽特·劳伦斯的一生》中,詹姆斯·金对这篇附言进行了反思,他首先问道:“为什么玛格丽特‘杀死’了佩吉?”然后回答说:“佩吉是她曾经的那个女孩,而玛格丽特是她渴望成为的那个女人。”虽然金认为这种转变是“突然而猛烈的,几乎就像一个性格的改变会伴随着名字的改变”(同上),但两者之间的脱节被劳伦斯插入的“我希望”巧妙地限定了。玛格丽特·劳伦斯这个名字也许被采纳了,但放弃过去的一切显然是不可能的。纵观上面的标题列表,玛格丽特·劳伦斯这个名字成为了永恒的元素,用图书馆目录的语言来说,也是本次评论的主要主题。但是,正如任何寻找主题的情况一样,这八部作品揭示了一个人开始时表面上的单一主题最终不能以任何单一或统一的方式来理解或辨别。考虑到过去几十年文学理论和批评对多元、多样性、异质性和差异概念的强调,玛格丽特·劳伦斯的作品被以不同的方式处理和解释可能显得平淡无奇,甚至是不必要的。然而,玛格丽特·劳伦斯的作品并不是这里主要主题标题下的全部。还有一个名叫玛格丽特·劳伦斯的人,以及她所过的生活。在这本关于玛格丽特·劳伦斯主题的近期作品集中我们相应地发现了两本关于劳伦斯写作的散文集,两本是劳伦斯与另一位作家的比较讨论,一篇是对劳伦斯的两本玛纳瓦卡小说的结构主义解读,两本书信集和一本传记。名字和身份,主题和主观性最近受到了很多批判性的审查,我在这篇评论的一开始就介绍了这些问题,既突出了这种审查所引起的关注,也表明它们在考虑玛格丽特·劳伦斯的生活和工作时特别相关。过去几十年的许多文学研究都解决了关于作家、作家在世界上的生活、世界和作品之间关系的重要问题。最近对玛格丽特·劳伦斯的研究都在不同程度上考虑了这些关系和问题。如果说早期的正统批评认为,文学作品应该被视为自主和独立的,与创作的历史和传记环境分开,那么,最近许多文学分析背后的推动力是,人们迫切希望将作品回归到它产生和接受的环境中。然而,这种回归并没有支持对历史、一段时期或一段生活的理解的再现,这些理解仅仅是背景,或者是作者的意图和意义可以固定的基础。相反,文学文本越来越被理解为一种话语形式,在特定的历史时刻,它与其他话语和实践相互作用,并被其他话语和实践塑造。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Making Markets out of Vice: Gambling, Cannabis, and Processes of State Legitimation and Formation in Canada Racial Capital, Public Debt, and the Appropriation of Epekwitk, 1853–1873 From Pride to Lies: English-Language Print Media Coverage of Supreme Court of Canada Decisions on Women’s Defensive Violence When Victims Look like Criminals: Rehumanizing Victim Representation in the Bruce McArthur Serial Killer Case A Message from the Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1