High Age Could Influence Large Thrombus Aspiration Catheter Advancement over the Carotid Siphon

JNET Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0044
Y. Matsumoto, Hayatsura Hanada, K. Nii, Yusuke Morinaga, M. Iko, Takafumi Mitsutake, A. Eto, H. Aikawa, K. Kazekawa, M. Tsutsumi
{"title":"High Age Could Influence Large Thrombus Aspiration Catheter Advancement over the Carotid Siphon","authors":"Y. Matsumoto, Hayatsura Hanada, K. Nii, Yusuke Morinaga, M. Iko, Takafumi Mitsutake, A. Eto, H. Aikawa, K. Kazekawa, M. Tsutsumi","doi":"10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: A direct aspiration technique using a 5MAX ACE catheter (Penumbra, Alameda, CA, USA) has been reported. However, recanalization has not been achieved in all cases with this technique alone. Additionally, Japan has a rapidly aging society, and differences in the condition of vessels, because of aging, can limit the approach of revascularization devices to the thrombus. We evaluated the accessibility of the 5MAX ACE (0.060-inch inner diameter) over the clinoid segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Methods: We conducted a retrospective and cross-sectional study of 28 patients who received intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke between October 2014 and October 2016. We recorded the maximum distal arrival point of the distal edge of the 5MAX ACE during the procedure before the stent retriever was retrieved. Results: In 5 of the 28 patients, the distal edge of the 5MAX ACE catheter did not advance over the clinoid segment of the ICA. The mean age of patients for whom the 5MAX ACE catheter failed to advance over the clinoid segment of the ICA was significantly higher (non-advancement: 85 ± 3 years) than that of patients with advancement (76 ± 9 years, Mann–Whitney U-test: P = 0.04). Conclusion: Advanced age may limit successful revascularization using only a direct aspiration technique with the 5MAX ACE without a stent or balloon anchoring technique for lesions at the terminal portion of the ICA and more distal arteries, which suggests that different devices or approaches may be needed for clot removal.","PeriodicalId":34768,"journal":{"name":"JNET","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNET","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A direct aspiration technique using a 5MAX ACE catheter (Penumbra, Alameda, CA, USA) has been reported. However, recanalization has not been achieved in all cases with this technique alone. Additionally, Japan has a rapidly aging society, and differences in the condition of vessels, because of aging, can limit the approach of revascularization devices to the thrombus. We evaluated the accessibility of the 5MAX ACE (0.060-inch inner diameter) over the clinoid segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Methods: We conducted a retrospective and cross-sectional study of 28 patients who received intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke between October 2014 and October 2016. We recorded the maximum distal arrival point of the distal edge of the 5MAX ACE during the procedure before the stent retriever was retrieved. Results: In 5 of the 28 patients, the distal edge of the 5MAX ACE catheter did not advance over the clinoid segment of the ICA. The mean age of patients for whom the 5MAX ACE catheter failed to advance over the clinoid segment of the ICA was significantly higher (non-advancement: 85 ± 3 years) than that of patients with advancement (76 ± 9 years, Mann–Whitney U-test: P = 0.04). Conclusion: Advanced age may limit successful revascularization using only a direct aspiration technique with the 5MAX ACE without a stent or balloon anchoring technique for lesions at the terminal portion of the ICA and more distal arteries, which suggests that different devices or approaches may be needed for clot removal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高龄可能影响颈动脉虹吸管上大血栓吸入管的推进
目的:报道了一种使用5MAX ACE导管(Penumbra, Alameda, CA, USA)的直接抽吸技术。然而,并不是在所有的情况下,仅用这种技术就能实现再通。此外,日本是一个快速老龄化的社会,由于老化,血管状况的差异可能会限制血运重建装置对血栓的接近。我们评估了5MAX ACE(内径0.060英寸)在颈内动脉(ICA)斜突段上的可及性。方法:对2014年10月至2016年10月28例接受动脉内治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者进行回顾性和横断面研究。在取出支架之前,我们记录了5MAX ACE远端边缘最大远端到达点。结果:28例患者中有5例5MAX ACE导管远端未超过ICA的斜突段。5MAX ACE导管未推进过ICA斜突段患者的平均年龄(85±3岁)明显高于进展患者(76±9岁,Mann-Whitney u检验:P = 0.04)。结论:高龄可能会限制仅使用5MAX ACE直接抽吸技术而不使用支架或球囊锚定技术对ICA末端和更远端动脉病变的成功血运重建,这表明可能需要不同的设备或方法来清除血栓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: JNET Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy is the official journal of the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET). The JNET publishes peer-reviewed original research related to neuroendovascular therapy, including clinical studies, state-of-the-art technology, education, and basic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Basilar Artery Occlusion Caused by Extracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection on Its Entry into the Transverse Foramen of the C6 Vertebra: Case Report. Mechanical Thrombectomy and Parent Artery Occlusion for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Due to Vertebral Fracture and Artery Dissection: A Case Report. Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Ruptured Aneurysms in the Acute Stage: Advantages and Disadvantages. Treatment Outcomes of 94 Cases of Pipeline Embolization Device in a Single Center: Predictive Factors of Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion. Endovascular Treatment of Anterior Cranial Fossa Dural Arteriovenous Fistula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1