Hypoallergenic formula with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG for babies with colic: A pilot study of recruitment, retention, and fecal biomarkers.

Nicole Y. Fatheree, Yuying Liu, M. Ferris, Melissa R. Van Arsdall, Valarie McMurtry, Marcela Zozaya, Chunyan C Cai, M. Rahbar, M. Hessabi, Ta Vu, Christine Wong, Juleen Min, D. Tran, F. Navarro, W. Gleason, Sara González, J. M. Rhoads
{"title":"Hypoallergenic formula with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG for babies with colic: A pilot study of recruitment, retention, and fecal biomarkers.","authors":"Nicole Y. Fatheree, Yuying Liu, M. Ferris, Melissa R. Van Arsdall, Valarie McMurtry, Marcela Zozaya, Chunyan C Cai, M. Rahbar, M. Hessabi, Ta Vu, Christine Wong, Juleen Min, D. Tran, F. Navarro, W. Gleason, Sara González, J. M. Rhoads","doi":"10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nTo investigate recruitment, retention, and estimates for effects of formula supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) on inflammatory biomarkers and fecal microbial community in infants with colic.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in otherwise healthy infants with colic. We screened 74 infants and randomized and analyzed results in 20 infants [9 receiving LGG (LGG+) and 11 not receiving LGG (LGG-)]. LGG was incorporated in the formula (Nutramigen(®)) (minimum of 3 × 10(7) CFU/d) in the LGG+ group. Fecal microbiota and inflammatory biomarkers, including fecal calprotectin (FC), plasma cytokines, circulating regulatory T cells (Tregs), and crying + fussing time were analyzed to determine optimal time points and effect sizes for a larger trial.\n\n\nRESULTS\nRecruitment in this population was slow, with about 66% of eligible infants willing to enroll; subject retention was better (75%). These rates were influenced by parents' reluctance to volunteer their infant for a clinical trial and by their tendency to change formulas. The maximal difference of crying + fussing time was observed at day 14, comparing the 2 groups, with a mean difference of -91 (95%CI: -76, 259) min (P = NS). FC showed no significant difference, but the optimal time to determine a potential effect was at day 90 [with a mean difference of 121 (95%CI: -48, 291) μg/g stool], observing a lower level of FC in the LGG+ group. The fecal microbial communities were chaotic, as determined by Shannon's diversity index and not apparently influenced by the probiotic. No significant change was observed in plasma inflammatory cytokines or Tregs, comparing LGG+ to LGG- groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nDesigning future colic trials involving a probiotic-supplemented formula for infants in the United States will require consideration for difficult enrollment. Infants with colic have major variations in feal microbiota and calprotectin, both of which improve with time, with optimal time points for measurement at days 14 and 90 after treatment.","PeriodicalId":68755,"journal":{"name":"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.160","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界胃肠病理生理学杂志(电子版)(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

AIM To investigate recruitment, retention, and estimates for effects of formula supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) on inflammatory biomarkers and fecal microbial community in infants with colic. METHODS A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in otherwise healthy infants with colic. We screened 74 infants and randomized and analyzed results in 20 infants [9 receiving LGG (LGG+) and 11 not receiving LGG (LGG-)]. LGG was incorporated in the formula (Nutramigen(®)) (minimum of 3 × 10(7) CFU/d) in the LGG+ group. Fecal microbiota and inflammatory biomarkers, including fecal calprotectin (FC), plasma cytokines, circulating regulatory T cells (Tregs), and crying + fussing time were analyzed to determine optimal time points and effect sizes for a larger trial. RESULTS Recruitment in this population was slow, with about 66% of eligible infants willing to enroll; subject retention was better (75%). These rates were influenced by parents' reluctance to volunteer their infant for a clinical trial and by their tendency to change formulas. The maximal difference of crying + fussing time was observed at day 14, comparing the 2 groups, with a mean difference of -91 (95%CI: -76, 259) min (P = NS). FC showed no significant difference, but the optimal time to determine a potential effect was at day 90 [with a mean difference of 121 (95%CI: -48, 291) μg/g stool], observing a lower level of FC in the LGG+ group. The fecal microbial communities were chaotic, as determined by Shannon's diversity index and not apparently influenced by the probiotic. No significant change was observed in plasma inflammatory cytokines or Tregs, comparing LGG+ to LGG- groups. CONCLUSION Designing future colic trials involving a probiotic-supplemented formula for infants in the United States will require consideration for difficult enrollment. Infants with colic have major variations in feal microbiota and calprotectin, both of which improve with time, with optimal time points for measurement at days 14 and 90 after treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含有鼠李糖乳杆菌GG的低过敏性配方奶粉用于绞痛婴儿:招募,保留和粪便生物标志物的初步研究。
目的研究鼠李糖乳杆菌GG (LGG)对肠绞痛婴儿炎症生物标志物和粪便微生物群落的影响。方法采用前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,对其他健康的肠绞痛患儿进行研究。我们筛选了74名婴儿,并随机分析了20名婴儿的结果[9名接受LGG治疗(LGG+), 11名未接受LGG治疗(LGG-)]。在LGG+组中,将LGG加入配方(Nutramigen(®))中(最少3 × 10(7) CFU/d)。分析粪便微生物群和炎症生物标志物,包括粪便钙保护蛋白(FC)、血浆细胞因子、循环调节性T细胞(Tregs)和哭泣+焦虑时间,以确定更大规模试验的最佳时间点和效应大小。结果该人群的招募进展缓慢,约66%的符合条件的婴儿愿意加入;受试者记忆较好(75%)。这些比率受到父母不愿自愿让他们的婴儿参加临床试验以及他们倾向于改变配方奶粉的影响。两组患儿哭闹时间的最大差异出现在第14天,平均差异为-91 min (95%CI: -76, 259) (P = NS)。FC无显著差异,但确定潜在效果的最佳时间是在第90天[平均差值为121 (95%CI: -48, 291) μg/g粪便],观察到LGG+组的FC水平较低。根据Shannon多样性指数判断,粪便微生物群落是混乱的,益生菌对其影响不明显。与LGG+组和LGG-组相比,血浆炎症细胞因子和Tregs未见明显变化。结论:未来在美国为婴儿设计涉及益生菌补充配方奶粉的绞痛试验需要考虑入组困难。肠绞痛婴儿的粪便微生物群和钙保护蛋白有很大的变化,两者都随着时间的推移而改善,治疗后第14天和第90天是测量的最佳时间点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
期刊最新文献
Microbiome as an endocrine organ and its relationship with eye diseases: Effective factors and new targeted approaches. Team players in the pathogenesis of metabolic dysfunctions-associated steatotic liver disease: The basis of development of pharmacotherapy. Link between irritable bowel syndrome, depression, and colorectal cancer risk in young patients: Age-matched nationwide population-based study. Novel, non-colonizing, single-strain live biotherapeutic product ADS024 protects against Clostridioides difficile infection challenge in vivo. Application of electron microscopy in gastroenterology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1