Satisfaction of patients with lumbar spine pain receiving physiotherapy treatment within health insurance reimbursement in Poland and in France

Q3 Medicine Postepy Rehabilitacji Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5114/AREH.2019.85020
Natalia Drżał, J. Drzał-Grabiec, A. Truszczyńska-Baszak, Natalia Twarowska
{"title":"Satisfaction of patients with lumbar spine pain receiving physiotherapy treatment within health insurance reimbursement in Poland and in France","authors":"Natalia Drżał, J. Drzał-Grabiec, A. Truszczyńska-Baszak, Natalia Twarowska","doi":"10.5114/AREH.2019.85020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Low-back pain syndromes are a common problem. The authors estimate that this ailment is experienced by more than 80% of populations in developed countries. The treatment of spine pain syndromes is an interdisciplinary issue. Therefore, a proper therapy must be multifactorial and take into consideration all aspects of a patient’s life. The aim of this work was to compare subjective evaluation of the process of rehabilitation of patients suffering from ailments related to lumbar spine pain who received physiotherapy within the health insurance reimbursement in Poland and in France. Material and methods: The study included 100 patients who underwent physiotherapy due to lumbosacral spine pain complaints. The study group consisted of 50 participants who received physiotherapy in Poland and 50 subjects who underwent it in France. The authors’ own questionnaire was employed in the study. It was prepared in two language versions, i.e. Polish and French. The questionnaire consisted of 34 questions on demography, pain complaints, the process of physiotherapy and the evaluation of pain on the VAS scale, before and after physiotherapy. Results: The assessment of the promptness of the employed treatments was statistically higher in the case of the patients in France (p=0.039). The general assessment of the physiotherapy process by the examined patients in Poland and in France was similar. No statistically significant differences were revealed in this respect (p=0.240). The process of the therapy was most often regarded as very good (66%). Conclusions: The patients with chronic lumbar spine pain undergoing therapy in France evaluated it higher than the patients in Poland. The effectiveness of physiotherapy in both countries did not vary considerably. France respects the rules of early intervention and extensiveness of physiotherapy to a larger degree than Poland. physiotherapy, spinal pain, kinesiotherapy, manual therapy email: natalia.twarowska@gmail.com The research was finances from the authors’ own resources Rehabilitation Advances in Rehabilitation/Postępy Rehabilitacji (2), 21–28, 2019 A – preparing concepts B – formulating methods C – conducting research D – processing results E – interpretation and","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/AREH.2019.85020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Low-back pain syndromes are a common problem. The authors estimate that this ailment is experienced by more than 80% of populations in developed countries. The treatment of spine pain syndromes is an interdisciplinary issue. Therefore, a proper therapy must be multifactorial and take into consideration all aspects of a patient’s life. The aim of this work was to compare subjective evaluation of the process of rehabilitation of patients suffering from ailments related to lumbar spine pain who received physiotherapy within the health insurance reimbursement in Poland and in France. Material and methods: The study included 100 patients who underwent physiotherapy due to lumbosacral spine pain complaints. The study group consisted of 50 participants who received physiotherapy in Poland and 50 subjects who underwent it in France. The authors’ own questionnaire was employed in the study. It was prepared in two language versions, i.e. Polish and French. The questionnaire consisted of 34 questions on demography, pain complaints, the process of physiotherapy and the evaluation of pain on the VAS scale, before and after physiotherapy. Results: The assessment of the promptness of the employed treatments was statistically higher in the case of the patients in France (p=0.039). The general assessment of the physiotherapy process by the examined patients in Poland and in France was similar. No statistically significant differences were revealed in this respect (p=0.240). The process of the therapy was most often regarded as very good (66%). Conclusions: The patients with chronic lumbar spine pain undergoing therapy in France evaluated it higher than the patients in Poland. The effectiveness of physiotherapy in both countries did not vary considerably. France respects the rules of early intervention and extensiveness of physiotherapy to a larger degree than Poland. physiotherapy, spinal pain, kinesiotherapy, manual therapy email: natalia.twarowska@gmail.com The research was finances from the authors’ own resources Rehabilitation Advances in Rehabilitation/Postępy Rehabilitacji (2), 21–28, 2019 A – preparing concepts B – formulating methods C – conducting research D – processing results E – interpretation and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰和法国健康保险报销范围内腰椎疼痛患者接受物理治疗的满意度
引言:腰痛综合征是一个常见的问题。作者估计,发达国家80%以上的人口都患有这种疾病。脊柱疼痛综合征的治疗是一个跨学科的问题。因此,适当的治疗必须是多因素的,并考虑到病人生活的各个方面。这项工作的目的是比较波兰和法国在医疗保险报销范围内接受物理治疗的腰椎疼痛相关疾病患者康复过程的主观评价。材料和方法:本研究纳入100例因腰骶脊柱疼痛主诉而接受物理治疗的患者。研究小组由50名在波兰接受物理治疗的参与者和50名在法国接受物理治疗的参与者组成。本研究采用作者自己的调查问卷。它以波兰文和法文两种语文编写。问卷包括人口统计学、疼痛主诉、物理治疗过程、物理治疗前后疼痛VAS评分等34个问题。结果:法国患者对所采用治疗方法的及时性评价有统计学意义(p=0.039)。在波兰和法国接受检查的患者对物理治疗过程的总体评估是相似的。两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.240)。治疗过程通常被认为非常好(66%)。结论:在法国接受治疗的慢性腰椎痛患者对其的评价高于波兰患者。两国的物理治疗效果差异不大。法国比波兰更尊重早期干预和广泛物理治疗的规则。电子邮件:natalia.twarowska@gmail.com本研究的资金来自作者自己的资源康复康复进展/Postępy康复康复杂志(2),2019年21-28日A -准备概念B -制定方法C -进行研究D -处理结果E -解释和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy Rehabilitacji
Postepy Rehabilitacji Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities
期刊最新文献
Exercise Training to Improve Balance Ability for Individuals with Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Parents of children with developmental disability have insufficient knowledge about healthy sleep in children Is there an association between traumatic peripheral lesions and cognitive impairments in adults? A scoping review Pilot study on the improvement effects of scapulothoracic exercises on the respiratory functions in sedentary young female adult with forward shoulder posture: a randomized control trial Assessment of the impact of injuries on basic movement patterns in amateur swimmers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1