Can a cervical muscle inhibition technique reduce chronic low back pain?

Q3 Medicine Postepy Rehabilitacji Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5114/areh.2021.111112
Shabnam Joshi, Rekha Yadav, A. Pawalia
{"title":"Can a cervical muscle inhibition technique reduce chronic low back pain?","authors":"Shabnam Joshi, Rekha Yadav, A. Pawalia","doi":"10.5114/areh.2021.111112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Chronic low back pain is the pain in the lumbo-sacral area with a duration of more than 3 months. The aim of the study was to find out the efficacy of sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique along with interferential therapy and exercises on pain and other functional parameters in chronic low back pain patients. Material and methods: 45 patients with a mean age of 38.53 ± 9.36 years who had chronic low back pain were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 15 in each group). Group-A received sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique, interferential therapy and exercise training, Group-B received interferential therapy and exercise training and Group-C received exercise training only for 3 days/week for 4 weeks. The outcome measures used were Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Modified-Modified Schober’s Test, Oswestry Disability Index and SF-36 questionnaire. Patients were assessed at baseline, after 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Results: There was significant within-group-effects (p = 0.001) for NPRS, lumbar flexion, functional disability (ODI) and quality of life (SF-36) in all the three groups, but not Lumbar extension. There was significant between-group-effect in lumbar flexion, lumbar extension and functional disability (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique along with interferential therapy and spinal exercises have better clinical effects than interferential therapy and exercises alone in chronic low back pain patients.","PeriodicalId":52524,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Rehabilitacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2021.111112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic low back pain is the pain in the lumbo-sacral area with a duration of more than 3 months. The aim of the study was to find out the efficacy of sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique along with interferential therapy and exercises on pain and other functional parameters in chronic low back pain patients. Material and methods: 45 patients with a mean age of 38.53 ± 9.36 years who had chronic low back pain were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 15 in each group). Group-A received sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique, interferential therapy and exercise training, Group-B received interferential therapy and exercise training and Group-C received exercise training only for 3 days/week for 4 weeks. The outcome measures used were Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Modified-Modified Schober’s Test, Oswestry Disability Index and SF-36 questionnaire. Patients were assessed at baseline, after 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Results: There was significant within-group-effects (p = 0.001) for NPRS, lumbar flexion, functional disability (ODI) and quality of life (SF-36) in all the three groups, but not Lumbar extension. There was significant between-group-effect in lumbar flexion, lumbar extension and functional disability (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique along with interferential therapy and spinal exercises have better clinical effects than interferential therapy and exercises alone in chronic low back pain patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈肌抑制技术能减轻慢性腰痛吗?
简介:慢性腰痛是指持续3个月以上的腰骶区疼痛。本研究旨在探讨枕下肌抑制技术配合干预治疗和运动对慢性腰痛患者疼痛及其他功能参数的影响。材料与方法:将45例平均年龄38.53±9.36岁的慢性腰痛患者随机分为3组,每组15例。a组采用枕下肌抑制技术、干预治疗和运动训练,b组采用干预治疗和运动训练,c组只进行运动训练,每周3天,共4周。结果测量采用数值疼痛评定量表、修正-修正Schober测验、Oswestry残疾指数和SF-36问卷。在基线、2周和4周后对患者进行评估。结果:三组患者在NPRS、腰椎屈曲、功能失能(ODI)和生活质量(SF-36)方面均存在显著组内效应(p = 0.001),但腰伸无显著组内效应。腰屈、腰伸、功能失能组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:枕下肌抑制技术联合干预治疗和脊柱运动治疗慢性腰痛的临床效果优于单纯干预治疗和运动治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy Rehabilitacji
Postepy Rehabilitacji Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Rehabilitation is not only directed to representatives of biological and medical sciences, specialists from almost all fields of medicine, such as cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, traumatology and internal diseases, have been published in it. The journal contains papers concerning psychological, sociological, and occupational rehabilitation, along with articles which deal with organization and marketing. The journal is also dedicated to the ethical problems of rehabilitation. A significant part of the published papers have focused on the problems of sport and physical activity for people with disabilities
期刊最新文献
Exercise Training to Improve Balance Ability for Individuals with Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Parents of children with developmental disability have insufficient knowledge about healthy sleep in children Is there an association between traumatic peripheral lesions and cognitive impairments in adults? A scoping review Pilot study on the improvement effects of scapulothoracic exercises on the respiratory functions in sedentary young female adult with forward shoulder posture: a randomized control trial Assessment of the impact of injuries on basic movement patterns in amateur swimmers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1