Explaining the Return of Fear with Revised Rescorla-Wagner Models.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2022-09-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5334/cpsy.88
Samuel Paskewitz, Joel Stoddard, Matt Jones
{"title":"Explaining the Return of Fear with Revised Rescorla-Wagner Models.","authors":"Samuel Paskewitz, Joel Stoddard, Matt Jones","doi":"10.5334/cpsy.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposure therapy - exposure to a feared stimulus without harmful consequences - can reduce fear responses in many mental disorders. However, such relief is often partial and temporary: fear can return after the therapy has ended. Conditioning research has identified three mechanisms for the return of fear, viz. change in physical context (renewal), the passage of time (spontaneous recovery), and an encounter with the fear-producing unconditioned stimulus (reinstatement). To understand why fear returns and thereby develop more effective therapies, we develop mathematical learning models based on that of Rescorla and Wagner. According to this model, context cues present during extinction become conditioned inhibitors (i.e. safety signals) which prevent total erasure of the threat association. Adding various mechanisms to the model allows it to explain different facets of the return of fear. Among these mechanisms is decay of inhibitory associations, which provides a novel explanation for spontaneous recovery. To make the benefits of exposure robust and permanent, one must minimize the degree to which the extinction context becomes inhibitory in order to maximize unlearning. We simulate several experimental paradigms that reduce the return of fear and explain them according to this principle.</p>","PeriodicalId":72664,"journal":{"name":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11104307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure therapy - exposure to a feared stimulus without harmful consequences - can reduce fear responses in many mental disorders. However, such relief is often partial and temporary: fear can return after the therapy has ended. Conditioning research has identified three mechanisms for the return of fear, viz. change in physical context (renewal), the passage of time (spontaneous recovery), and an encounter with the fear-producing unconditioned stimulus (reinstatement). To understand why fear returns and thereby develop more effective therapies, we develop mathematical learning models based on that of Rescorla and Wagner. According to this model, context cues present during extinction become conditioned inhibitors (i.e. safety signals) which prevent total erasure of the threat association. Adding various mechanisms to the model allows it to explain different facets of the return of fear. Among these mechanisms is decay of inhibitory associations, which provides a novel explanation for spontaneous recovery. To make the benefits of exposure robust and permanent, one must minimize the degree to which the extinction context becomes inhibitory in order to maximize unlearning. We simulate several experimental paradigms that reduce the return of fear and explain them according to this principle.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用修订的雷斯科拉-瓦格纳模型解释恐惧的回归。
暴露疗法--暴露于恐惧刺激而不产生有害后果--可以减轻许多精神障碍患者的恐惧反应。然而,这种缓解往往是部分和暂时的:治疗结束后,恐惧可能会卷土重来。条件反射研究发现了恐惧卷土重来的三种机制,即物理环境的变化(更新)、时间的流逝(自发恢复)以及遇到产生恐惧的无条件刺激(恢复)。为了了解恐惧复发的原因,从而开发出更有效的疗法,我们在雷斯科拉和瓦格纳的基础上建立了数学学习模型。根据该模型,在消退过程中出现的情境线索会成为条件抑制剂(即安全信号),阻止威胁关联的完全消除。在该模型中加入各种机制,可以解释恐惧回归的不同方面。这些机制包括抑制性联想的衰减,这为自发恢复提供了一种新的解释。为了使暴露带来的益处稳健而持久,我们必须最大限度地降低消减情境的抑制程度,从而最大限度地解除学习。我们模拟了几种减少恐惧恢复的实验范式,并根据这一原理对它们进行了解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
(Mal)adaptive Mentalizing in the Cognitive Hierarchy, and Its Link to Paranoia. Decision-Making, Pro-variance Biases and Mood-Related Traits. Enhancing Within-Person Estimation of Neurocognition and the Prediction of Externalizing Behaviors in Adolescents. Updating Prospective Self-Efficacy Beliefs About Cardiac Interoception in Anorexia Nervosa: An Experimental and Computational Study. Temporal Dynamics of Uncertainty Cause Anxiety and Avoidance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1