Tamara Rodrigues da Silva Destro, T. M. P. C. Biazon, H. Pott-Junior, F. Caruso, D. K. Andaku, N. M. Garcia, J. C. Bonjorno-Junior, A. Borghi-Silva, D. Kawakami, V. Castello-Simões, R. Mendes
{"title":"Early passive mobilization increases vascular reactivity response in critical patients with sepsis: a quasi-experimental study","authors":"Tamara Rodrigues da Silva Destro, T. M. P. C. Biazon, H. Pott-Junior, F. Caruso, D. K. Andaku, N. M. Garcia, J. C. Bonjorno-Junior, A. Borghi-Silva, D. Kawakami, V. Castello-Simões, R. Mendes","doi":"10.5935/0103-507X.20220132-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To investigate the influence of a passive mobilization session on endothelial function in patients with sepsis. Methods This was a quasi-experimental double-blind and single-arm study with a pre- and postintervention design. Twenty-five patients with a diagnosis of sepsis who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit were included. Endothelial function was assessed at baseline (preintervention) and immediately postintervention by brachial artery ultrasonography. Flow mediated dilatation, peak blood flow velocity and peak shear rate were obtained. Passive mobilization consisted of bilateral mobilization (ankles, knees, hips, wrists, elbows and shoulders), with three sets of ten repetitions each, totaling 15 minutes. Results After mobilization, we found increased vascular reactivity function compared to preintervention: absolute flow-mediated dilatation (0.57mm ± 0.22 versus 0.17mm ± 0.31; p < 0.001) and relative flow-mediated dilatation (17.1% ± 8.25 versus 5.08% ± 9.16; p < 0.001). Reactive hyperemia peak flow (71.8cm/s ± 29.3 versus 95.3cm/s ± 32.2; p < 0.001) and shear rate (211s ± 113 versus 288s ± 144; p < 0.001) were also increased. Conclusion A passive mobilization session increases endothelial function in critical patients with sepsis. Future studies should investigate whether a mobilization program can be applied as a beneficial intervention for clinical improvement of endothelial function in patients hospitalized due to sepsis.","PeriodicalId":53519,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","volume":"34 1","pages":"461 - 468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220132-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective To investigate the influence of a passive mobilization session on endothelial function in patients with sepsis. Methods This was a quasi-experimental double-blind and single-arm study with a pre- and postintervention design. Twenty-five patients with a diagnosis of sepsis who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit were included. Endothelial function was assessed at baseline (preintervention) and immediately postintervention by brachial artery ultrasonography. Flow mediated dilatation, peak blood flow velocity and peak shear rate were obtained. Passive mobilization consisted of bilateral mobilization (ankles, knees, hips, wrists, elbows and shoulders), with three sets of ten repetitions each, totaling 15 minutes. Results After mobilization, we found increased vascular reactivity function compared to preintervention: absolute flow-mediated dilatation (0.57mm ± 0.22 versus 0.17mm ± 0.31; p < 0.001) and relative flow-mediated dilatation (17.1% ± 8.25 versus 5.08% ± 9.16; p < 0.001). Reactive hyperemia peak flow (71.8cm/s ± 29.3 versus 95.3cm/s ± 32.2; p < 0.001) and shear rate (211s ± 113 versus 288s ± 144; p < 0.001) were also increased. Conclusion A passive mobilization session increases endothelial function in critical patients with sepsis. Future studies should investigate whether a mobilization program can be applied as a beneficial intervention for clinical improvement of endothelial function in patients hospitalized due to sepsis.
目的探讨被动活动对脓毒症患者内皮功能的影响。方法采用准实验双盲单臂研究,采用干预前后设计。在重症监护室住院的25例诊断为败血症的患者被纳入研究。在基线(干预前)和干预后立即通过肱动脉超声检查评估内皮功能。得到血流介导的扩张、血流速度峰值和剪切速率峰值。被动活动包括双侧活动(脚踝、膝盖、臀部、手腕、肘部和肩部),每组重复10次,共15分钟。结果与干预前相比,活动后血管反应性功能增强:血流介导的绝对扩张(0.57mm±0.22 vs 0.17mm±0.31);P < 0.001)和相对血流介导的舒张(17.1%±8.25 vs 5.08%±9.16;P < 0.001)。反应性充血峰值流量(71.8cm/s±29.3 vs 95.3cm/s±32.2;P < 0.001)和剪切速率(211s±113比288s±144;P < 0.001)。结论被动活动可提高重症脓毒症患者的内皮功能。未来的研究应探讨动员方案是否可以作为一种有益的干预措施,用于脓毒症住院患者内皮功能的临床改善。