Use of social networks in emerging adults: The role of irrational beliefs

Q4 Social Sciences Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5937/specedreh20-32793
I. Stojković, T. Vukosavljević-Gvozden
{"title":"Use of social networks in emerging adults: The role of irrational beliefs","authors":"I. Stojković, T. Vukosavljević-Gvozden","doi":"10.5937/specedreh20-32793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The use of online social networks has become widespread among the young. Although it may have beneficial effects, it has been established that some people develop problematic or excessive use of social networks which may negatively impact their psychosocial functioning. Objective. The aim of the present study was to investigate social networks use among emerging adults and to explore whether irrational and rational beliefs as conceptualized within the Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (RE&CBT) framework predict problematic social networks use. Following RE&CBT framework, we hypothesized that irrational beliefs are positively, and rational beliefs negatively related to problematic social networks use. Methods. The sample included 210 emerging adults (age range 18-26, M = 21.08, SD = 2.02), 59.0% females. Serbian version of the General Attitude and Belief Scale (SGABS) was used for the assessment of irrational and rational beliefs. Serbian version of Internet Addiction Test was adapted for the assessment of problematic social networks use. Results. The results supported the hypothesis that irrational beliefs are positively related to problematic social networks use. When controlling for intercorrelations between beliefs, demands for love and approval from others stood out as a single significant predictor of problematic social networks use. Rational beliefs were unrelated to problematic social networks use, thus not supporting the hypothesis. Conclusion. The results suggest that RE&CBT approach, which has been proven to be efficacious in prevention of various problems of psychosocial functioning may also provide framework for supporting young people to use social networks in a constructive way.","PeriodicalId":36810,"journal":{"name":"Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh20-32793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The use of online social networks has become widespread among the young. Although it may have beneficial effects, it has been established that some people develop problematic or excessive use of social networks which may negatively impact their psychosocial functioning. Objective. The aim of the present study was to investigate social networks use among emerging adults and to explore whether irrational and rational beliefs as conceptualized within the Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (RE&CBT) framework predict problematic social networks use. Following RE&CBT framework, we hypothesized that irrational beliefs are positively, and rational beliefs negatively related to problematic social networks use. Methods. The sample included 210 emerging adults (age range 18-26, M = 21.08, SD = 2.02), 59.0% females. Serbian version of the General Attitude and Belief Scale (SGABS) was used for the assessment of irrational and rational beliefs. Serbian version of Internet Addiction Test was adapted for the assessment of problematic social networks use. Results. The results supported the hypothesis that irrational beliefs are positively related to problematic social networks use. When controlling for intercorrelations between beliefs, demands for love and approval from others stood out as a single significant predictor of problematic social networks use. Rational beliefs were unrelated to problematic social networks use, thus not supporting the hypothesis. Conclusion. The results suggest that RE&CBT approach, which has been proven to be efficacious in prevention of various problems of psychosocial functioning may also provide framework for supporting young people to use social networks in a constructive way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新成人社会网络的使用:非理性信念的作用
介绍。在线社交网络的使用在年轻人中已经变得很普遍。虽然它可能有有益的影响,但已经确定有些人会出现问题或过度使用社交网络,这可能会对他们的社会心理功能产生负面影响。目标。本研究的目的是调查新兴成人的社会网络使用情况,并探讨在理性情绪和认知行为治疗(RE&CBT)框架内概念化的非理性和理性信念是否能预测有问题的社会网络使用。在RE&CBT框架下,我们假设非理性信念与有问题的社交网络使用呈正相关,而理性信念与有问题的社交网络使用负相关。方法。样本包括210名初生成人(年龄18 ~ 26岁,M = 21.08, SD = 2.02),其中女性占59.0%。采用塞尔维亚版的一般态度与信念量表(SGABS)来评估非理性信念和理性信念。塞尔维亚版本的网络成瘾测试被用于评估有问题的社交网络使用。结果。研究结果支持了非理性信念与有问题的社交网络使用呈正相关的假设。当控制信仰之间的相互关系时,对爱的需求和他人的认可作为有问题的社交网络使用的一个重要预测因素脱颖而出。理性信念与有问题的社交网络使用无关,因此不支持该假设。结论。研究结果表明,RE&CBT方法在预防各种社会心理功能问题方面已被证明是有效的,它也可能为支持年轻人以建设性的方式使用社交网络提供框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija
Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
The importance of sport for members of the deaf community Social adjustment of adolescents with hearing impairment in Nigeria: Will televised aggression and pornographic addiction mediate? Science education practices for deaf and hard-of-hearing students in Indonesia The relationship of sensory processing of children with developmental dysphasia with burnout and self-esteem of parents The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of speech therapy services in Bosnia and Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1