Formative assessment in Physical education and its relation to the level of attention of primary school children

Q4 Social Sciences Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5937/specedreh21-36486
P. Carrillo-López, Rubén Maneiro-Dios, J. Moral-García
{"title":"Formative assessment in Physical education and its relation to the level of attention of primary school children","authors":"P. Carrillo-López, Rubén Maneiro-Dios, J. Moral-García","doi":"10.5937/specedreh21-36486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between primary school students' perception of the Physical Education teacher's formative assessment practices in terms of their level of attention. Methods. In this descriptive cross-sectional study that included 172 students, attention was assessed through the Perception of Similarities and Differences test and the teacher's formative assessment practices through the teacher performance questionnaire associated with formative assessment practices whose scores were validated. Results. With regard to gender, Student's t-test showed no significant differences except for the number of errors in favour of males (p < .05). In relation to the level of attention, we detected statistically significant differences in metacognitive (p < .05) and retrospective (p < .05) formative assessment in favour of those with a lower level of attention. However, the linear regression test showed a negative association between attention and metacognitive formative assessment (R 2 = .28). Conclusion. It can be concluded that a lower level of attention seems to be associated with a higher perception of primary school students of metacognitive assessment practice associated with internal information processing and with retroactive assessment practice, which is related to the anticipation of learning difficulties. Being aware of the importance of formative assessment in the teaching-learning process, it would be advisable to involve the whole educational community in order to arouse interest among teachers, as it provides essential knowledge in their professional work, contributing to the improvement of academic development as well as to the comprehensive training of all schoolchildren.","PeriodicalId":36810,"journal":{"name":"Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh21-36486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between primary school students' perception of the Physical Education teacher's formative assessment practices in terms of their level of attention. Methods. In this descriptive cross-sectional study that included 172 students, attention was assessed through the Perception of Similarities and Differences test and the teacher's formative assessment practices through the teacher performance questionnaire associated with formative assessment practices whose scores were validated. Results. With regard to gender, Student's t-test showed no significant differences except for the number of errors in favour of males (p < .05). In relation to the level of attention, we detected statistically significant differences in metacognitive (p < .05) and retrospective (p < .05) formative assessment in favour of those with a lower level of attention. However, the linear regression test showed a negative association between attention and metacognitive formative assessment (R 2 = .28). Conclusion. It can be concluded that a lower level of attention seems to be associated with a higher perception of primary school students of metacognitive assessment practice associated with internal information processing and with retroactive assessment practice, which is related to the anticipation of learning difficulties. Being aware of the importance of formative assessment in the teaching-learning process, it would be advisable to involve the whole educational community in order to arouse interest among teachers, as it provides essential knowledge in their professional work, contributing to the improvement of academic development as well as to the comprehensive training of all schoolchildren.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学生体育形成性评价及其与注意水平的关系
介绍。摘要本研究旨在分析小学生对体育教师形成性评价的认知与注意程度之间的关系。方法。在这项包括172名学生的描述性横断面研究中,通过相似性和差异感知测试和教师的形成性评估实践来评估注意力,并通过教师绩效问卷与形成性评估实践相关联,其分数得到验证。结果。在性别方面,学生t检验显示,除了偏向男性的错误数外,没有显著差异(p < 0.05)。在注意水平方面,我们发现在元认知(p < 0.05)和回顾性(p < 0.05)形成性评估方面存在统计学上的显著差异,有利于那些注意水平较低的人。然而,线性回归检验显示注意力与元认知形成性评价呈负相关(r2 = 0.28)。结论。结果表明,注意水平较低的小学生对与内部信息加工相关的元认知评价实践和回溯性评价实践的感知较高,而回溯性评价实践与学习困难的预期有关。认识到形成性评估在教与学过程中的重要性,为了引起教师的兴趣,最好是让整个教育界参与进来,因为它为教师的专业工作提供了必要的知识,有助于改善学业发展,并有助于所有学童的全面培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija
Specijalna Edukacija i Rehabilitacija Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
The importance of sport for members of the deaf community Social adjustment of adolescents with hearing impairment in Nigeria: Will televised aggression and pornographic addiction mediate? Science education practices for deaf and hard-of-hearing students in Indonesia The relationship of sensory processing of children with developmental dysphasia with burnout and self-esteem of parents The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of speech therapy services in Bosnia and Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1