Adherence to home ventilation therapy in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: prevalence, determinants and costs of non-compliance. A cross-sectional study

IF 0.5 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Primary Care Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5114/FMPCR.2021.105921
Mariana Martins, R. Passos, Joana Peixoto, C. Costa, Luís Mendes, P. Santos, R. Nêveda
{"title":"Adherence to home ventilation therapy in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: prevalence, determinants and costs of non-compliance. A cross-sectional study","authors":"Mariana Martins, R. Passos, Joana Peixoto, C. Costa, Luís Mendes, P. Santos, R. Nêveda","doi":"10.5114/FMPCR.2021.105921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common chronic disease with high impact both as an independent cardio - vascular risk factor and in quality of life. Home positive pressure ventilation is the main available therapeutic intervention, depending on its utilization by patients. Objectives. Our aim was to determine the adherence to home ventilation therapy, prospecting for the determinants of compliance. Secondarily, we evaluated the direct costs of non-adherence. Material and methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study based on retrospective analysis of a sample of 1,183 OSA patients fol - lowed in a pulmonology department during 2018. Patients with less than 180 days of utilization were excluded. The adherence to ven - tilation therapy was defined by utilization of more than 4 hours a day, at least 70% of the days. Costs were calculated using Portuguese official prices for reimbursement. Results. A total of 744 patients were included for analysis. The adherents were 63.4% (95% CI: 60.5–67.4%). Ageing ( p = 0.014), severity of disease at diagnosis ( p = 0.044), room sharing ( p = 0.002), working in the primary economic sector ( p = 0.014) and using BiPAP ( p = 0.046) were associated with higher adherence. The total costs of non-adherence were estimated at 112,373.68 €. Conclusions. The adherence of patients to treatments is a relevant topic of discussion. Our results are concordant with literature, reinforcing the importance of holding the patient accountable to improve compliance with treatment. Adherence is lower than neces - sary to achieve the maximization of the therapeutic benefits, leading to a higher burden of disease, higher costs and significant waste.","PeriodicalId":44481,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/FMPCR.2021.105921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common chronic disease with high impact both as an independent cardio - vascular risk factor and in quality of life. Home positive pressure ventilation is the main available therapeutic intervention, depending on its utilization by patients. Objectives. Our aim was to determine the adherence to home ventilation therapy, prospecting for the determinants of compliance. Secondarily, we evaluated the direct costs of non-adherence. Material and methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study based on retrospective analysis of a sample of 1,183 OSA patients fol - lowed in a pulmonology department during 2018. Patients with less than 180 days of utilization were excluded. The adherence to ven - tilation therapy was defined by utilization of more than 4 hours a day, at least 70% of the days. Costs were calculated using Portuguese official prices for reimbursement. Results. A total of 744 patients were included for analysis. The adherents were 63.4% (95% CI: 60.5–67.4%). Ageing ( p = 0.014), severity of disease at diagnosis ( p = 0.044), room sharing ( p = 0.002), working in the primary economic sector ( p = 0.014) and using BiPAP ( p = 0.046) were associated with higher adherence. The total costs of non-adherence were estimated at 112,373.68 €. Conclusions. The adherence of patients to treatments is a relevant topic of discussion. Our results are concordant with literature, reinforcing the importance of holding the patient accountable to improve compliance with treatment. Adherence is lower than neces - sary to achieve the maximization of the therapeutic benefits, leading to a higher burden of disease, higher costs and significant waste.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者坚持家庭通气治疗:患病率、决定因素和不遵守的成本。横断面研究
背景。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种常见的慢性疾病,作为一种独立的心血管危险因素和影响生活质量。家庭正压通气是主要可用的治疗干预措施,取决于患者的使用情况。目标。我们的目的是确定家庭通风治疗的依从性,寻找依从性的决定因素。其次,我们评估了不遵医嘱的直接成本。材料和方法。我们对2018年在肺科随访的1183例OSA患者样本进行了回顾性分析,并进行了一项横断面研究。使用时间少于180天的患者被排除在外。坚持均匀按摩治疗的定义是每天使用超过4小时,至少70%的天。费用是用葡萄牙官方价格计算的。结果。共纳入744例患者进行分析。粘附者占63.4% (95% CI: 60.5 ~ 67.4%)。年龄(p = 0.014)、诊断时疾病的严重程度(p = 0.044)、共用房间(p = 0.002)、在主要经济部门工作(p = 0.014)和使用BiPAP (p = 0.046)与较高的依从性相关。不遵守规定的总费用估计为112,373.68欧元。结论。患者对治疗的依从性是一个相关的讨论话题。我们的结果与文献一致,强调了让患者负责以提高治疗依从性的重要性。依从性低于实现治疗效益最大化所需的水平,导致更高的疾病负担、更高的费用和严重的浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The significance of awareness about iron deficiency anaemia in its prevention among Iraqi pregnant women attending primary healthcare centres Pattern of platelet indices in hypertension: a single-centre experience for a primary care setting Association of mental health and medication adherence with blood pressure control in primary care patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study Violence against women with hearing disabilities in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia Patient satisfaction and health system responsiveness among attendants to family health centres and units affiliated with universal health insurance in Port Said Governorate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1