Original efficiency indices in PHC patient care

IF 0.5 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Primary Care Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108192
Magdalena Bogdan, A. Prusaczyk, P. Żuk, Marika Guzek, A. Nitsch-Osuch, Joanna Oberska
{"title":"Original efficiency indices in PHC patient care","authors":"Magdalena Bogdan, A. Prusaczyk, P. Żuk, Marika Guzek, A. Nitsch-Osuch, Joanna Oberska","doi":"10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. the ever-increasing needs and demands of patients, development of new treatments and health services together with limited financial, infrastructural and human resources require an increase in the efficiency of health care while minimizing the cost of this process. Raising cost-effectiveness at the level of individual physicians is a response to the limitations of healthcare resources and high physician involvement in the choice of diagnostics and treatment methods. Objectives. to develop efficiency indices that can be used in studies on doctors' efficiency in PhC patient care. Material and methods. the indices were developed following a pilot study at the Medical and Diagnostic Center in siedlce, Poland, literature analysis and expert consultations. they were based on Data envelopment analysis (Dea) methodology and focused on three operational areas: structure, process and outcome. the quality and reliability of the indices were tested on a group of PhC physicians. Results. 11 indices were developed: 1 index within quality of structure (patient population coverage), 7 indices within quality of process (efficiency of working time, efficiency of key appointments, efficiency of comprehensive medical consultations, efficiency of the number of basic and extended check-ups, percentage of pap smear tests, percentage of mammography screening tests, percentage of prophylactic cardiovascular screening tests) and 3 indices within quality of outcome (efficiency of the performance of health care plan, efficiency of the number if issued DILO cards, average years of life). Conclusions. the proposed indices worked well in practice, and in the future, a collective efficiency scale based on these indices is planned to be developed.","PeriodicalId":44481,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2021.108192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. the ever-increasing needs and demands of patients, development of new treatments and health services together with limited financial, infrastructural and human resources require an increase in the efficiency of health care while minimizing the cost of this process. Raising cost-effectiveness at the level of individual physicians is a response to the limitations of healthcare resources and high physician involvement in the choice of diagnostics and treatment methods. Objectives. to develop efficiency indices that can be used in studies on doctors' efficiency in PhC patient care. Material and methods. the indices were developed following a pilot study at the Medical and Diagnostic Center in siedlce, Poland, literature analysis and expert consultations. they were based on Data envelopment analysis (Dea) methodology and focused on three operational areas: structure, process and outcome. the quality and reliability of the indices were tested on a group of PhC physicians. Results. 11 indices were developed: 1 index within quality of structure (patient population coverage), 7 indices within quality of process (efficiency of working time, efficiency of key appointments, efficiency of comprehensive medical consultations, efficiency of the number of basic and extended check-ups, percentage of pap smear tests, percentage of mammography screening tests, percentage of prophylactic cardiovascular screening tests) and 3 indices within quality of outcome (efficiency of the performance of health care plan, efficiency of the number if issued DILO cards, average years of life). Conclusions. the proposed indices worked well in practice, and in the future, a collective efficiency scale based on these indices is planned to be developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健病人护理的原始效率指标
背景。病人不断增加的需要和要求、新疗法和保健服务的发展,以及有限的财政、基础设施和人力资源,都要求提高保健的效率,同时尽量减少这一过程的成本。提高个体医生的成本效益是对医疗资源有限和医生高度参与诊断和治疗方法选择的一种回应。目标。建立可用于临床医生护理效率研究的效率指标。材料和方法。这些指数是在波兰锡德莱兹医疗和诊断中心进行试点研究、文献分析和专家协商后制定的。它们基于数据包络分析(Dea)方法,并侧重于三个操作领域:结构、过程和结果。对一组临床医师进行了指标的质量和可靠性测试。结果:制定了11项指标:1个结构质量指标(患者人口覆盖率),7个过程质量指标(工作时间效率、关键预约效率、综合医疗咨询效率、基本和扩展检查次数效率、巴氏涂片检查百分比、乳房x光检查百分比、预防性心血管筛查测试百分比)和3个结果质量指标(医疗保健计划执行效率)。效率(如签发DILO卡的数量,平均寿命)。结论。本文提出的指标在实践中取得了良好的效果,并计划在此基础上编制集体效率量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The significance of awareness about iron deficiency anaemia in its prevention among Iraqi pregnant women attending primary healthcare centres Pattern of platelet indices in hypertension: a single-centre experience for a primary care setting Association of mental health and medication adherence with blood pressure control in primary care patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study Violence against women with hearing disabilities in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia Patient satisfaction and health system responsiveness among attendants to family health centres and units affiliated with universal health insurance in Port Said Governorate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1