The Amazing Internet Challenge: How Leading Projects Use Library Skills to Organize the Web.

J. Swanton
{"title":"The Amazing Internet Challenge: How Leading Projects Use Library Skills to Organize the Web.","authors":"J. Swanton","doi":"10.5860/choice.37-5713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This collection describes twelve Internet virtual libraries selected by the editors for “their international reputation as leaders in the delivery of selective, quality resources” (p. v). The twelve are: (1) Agriculture Network Information Center/AgNIC, (2) Argus Clearinghouse/Argus, (3) Blue Web/n, (4) BUBL Information Service/BUBL, (5) Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library/EEVL, (6) INFOMINE, (7) Internet Public Library/IPL, (8) Librarians' Index to the Internet/LII, (9) Mathematics Archives, (10) Organising Medical Networked Information/OMNI, (11) Scout Report Signpost, and (12) Social Science Information Gateway/SOSIG. Eight are based in the United States and four in the United Kingdom. The twelve cover a spectrum of information services covering both specialized and interdisciplinary subject areas. The purpose of this collection is to present these projects as “strategic examples of the possibilities inherent in online information” (p. v). It is designed to appeal to reference librarians, catalogers, systems librarians, and administrators by providing insight into the day-to-day workflows and the long-term plans of the twelve virtual libraries. \n \nA basic assumption of this presentation is that all virtual libraries share common concerns and challenges. Therefore, within its own scope, each project has defined “quality information” and “trusted sources” and determined selection criteria to create collection resources valuable to its users. Although some of the criteria will be the same as those used in the print world (e.g., author, content, audience, and scope), the ephemeral nature of the Internet resource requires that new criteria also be considered, such as design and accessibility, site permanence, site revision and updating provisions, and linkage accuracy. \n \nThe virtual library faces these fundamental considerations as well as more complex challenges. How best to use the technology to present and deliver information to the end user? How best to present the collection through the user interface? How many access methods should be provided? These and other issues are faced by the project developers, and their decisions are based on the primary audience served. The funding source, in most cases, defines the primary audience … and so it goes with each project having addressed common issues faced by all. \n \nThe editors have profiled each of the twelve virtual libraries in chapters that follow the same outline: (1) responsible persons, (2) mission statement, (3) funding source(s) and project budget, (4) target audiences, (5) collection description, (6) resource selection and evaluation, (7) software and hardware mechanics, (8) taxonomy of classification, (9) project strengths, (10) project weaknesses, (11) project time frames, (12) project future goals, and (13) vision statements for future resource location and description. While each project has responded to these profile questions in its own way, the format provides a common outline that underscores the unique and outstanding approaches that the individual projects have taken in working in an online environment. \n \nFor those faced with the challenges of organizing information on the Internet, this book should provide much useful data on selection criteria, evaluation processes, funding and budget mechanisms, and software and hardware technology. The twelve virtual libraries described here have been called trailblazers. Those about to embark on a similar project will want to familiarize themselves with the collective experience presented by these twelve successful projects.","PeriodicalId":72483,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Medical Library Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-5713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This collection describes twelve Internet virtual libraries selected by the editors for “their international reputation as leaders in the delivery of selective, quality resources” (p. v). The twelve are: (1) Agriculture Network Information Center/AgNIC, (2) Argus Clearinghouse/Argus, (3) Blue Web/n, (4) BUBL Information Service/BUBL, (5) Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library/EEVL, (6) INFOMINE, (7) Internet Public Library/IPL, (8) Librarians' Index to the Internet/LII, (9) Mathematics Archives, (10) Organising Medical Networked Information/OMNI, (11) Scout Report Signpost, and (12) Social Science Information Gateway/SOSIG. Eight are based in the United States and four in the United Kingdom. The twelve cover a spectrum of information services covering both specialized and interdisciplinary subject areas. The purpose of this collection is to present these projects as “strategic examples of the possibilities inherent in online information” (p. v). It is designed to appeal to reference librarians, catalogers, systems librarians, and administrators by providing insight into the day-to-day workflows and the long-term plans of the twelve virtual libraries. A basic assumption of this presentation is that all virtual libraries share common concerns and challenges. Therefore, within its own scope, each project has defined “quality information” and “trusted sources” and determined selection criteria to create collection resources valuable to its users. Although some of the criteria will be the same as those used in the print world (e.g., author, content, audience, and scope), the ephemeral nature of the Internet resource requires that new criteria also be considered, such as design and accessibility, site permanence, site revision and updating provisions, and linkage accuracy. The virtual library faces these fundamental considerations as well as more complex challenges. How best to use the technology to present and deliver information to the end user? How best to present the collection through the user interface? How many access methods should be provided? These and other issues are faced by the project developers, and their decisions are based on the primary audience served. The funding source, in most cases, defines the primary audience … and so it goes with each project having addressed common issues faced by all. The editors have profiled each of the twelve virtual libraries in chapters that follow the same outline: (1) responsible persons, (2) mission statement, (3) funding source(s) and project budget, (4) target audiences, (5) collection description, (6) resource selection and evaluation, (7) software and hardware mechanics, (8) taxonomy of classification, (9) project strengths, (10) project weaknesses, (11) project time frames, (12) project future goals, and (13) vision statements for future resource location and description. While each project has responded to these profile questions in its own way, the format provides a common outline that underscores the unique and outstanding approaches that the individual projects have taken in working in an online environment. For those faced with the challenges of organizing information on the Internet, this book should provide much useful data on selection criteria, evaluation processes, funding and budget mechanisms, and software and hardware technology. The twelve virtual libraries described here have been called trailblazers. Those about to embark on a similar project will want to familiarize themselves with the collective experience presented by these twelve successful projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
惊人的互联网挑战:领先的项目如何使用图书馆技能来组织网络。
本选集描述了12个由编辑选出的互联网虚拟图书馆,因为它们“在提供有选择性的优质资源方面享有国际声誉”(第5页)。这12个图书馆是:(1)农业网络信息中心/AgNIC, (2) Argus Clearinghouse/Argus, (3) Blue Web/n, (4) BUBL信息服务/BUBL,(5)爱丁堡工程虚拟图书馆/EEVL, (6) INFOMINE,(7)互联网公共图书馆/IPL,(8)互联网馆员索引/LII,(9)数学档案,(10)组织医学网络信息/OMNI,(11)童子军报告路标,(12)社会科学信息门户/SOSIG。其中8家在美国,4家在英国。这十二项服务涵盖了专业和跨学科主题领域的一系列信息服务。这个集合的目的是将这些项目作为“在线信息固有可能性的战略例子”(第5页)。它旨在通过提供对12个虚拟图书馆的日常工作流程和长期计划的洞察来吸引参考图书馆员、编目员、系统图书馆员和管理员。本演讲的一个基本假设是,所有虚拟图书馆都有共同的关注点和挑战。因此,在自己的范围内,每个项目都定义了“优质信息”和“可信来源”,并确定了选择标准,以创建对其用户有价值的收集资源。虽然其中一些标准与印刷世界中使用的标准相同(例如,作者、内容、受众和范围),但Internet资源的短暂性也要求考虑新的标准,例如设计和可访问性、站点持久性、站点修订和更新规定以及链接准确性。虚拟图书馆既面临着这些基本问题,也面临着更复杂的挑战。如何最好地使用技术向最终用户呈现和传递信息?如何通过用户界面最好地呈现集合?应该提供多少访问方法?这些和其他问题都是项目开发人员所面临的,他们的决策是基于所服务的主要受众。在大多数情况下,资金来源决定了主要受众,因此每个项目都要解决所有人面临的共同问题。编辑们按照相同的大纲,在章节中分别介绍了12个虚拟图书馆:(1)负责人,(2)任务声明,(3)资金来源和项目预算,(4)目标受众,(5)集合描述,(6)资源选择和评估,(7)软件和硬件机制,(8)分类分类,(9)项目优势,(10)项目劣势,(11)项目时间框架,(12)项目未来目标,(13)未来资源定位和描述的愿景陈述。虽然每个项目都以自己的方式回答了这些概要问题,但该格式提供了一个共同的大纲,强调了各个项目在在线环境中所采取的独特而杰出的方法。对于那些面临在互联网上组织信息的挑战,这本书应该提供很多有用的数据选择标准,评估过程,资金和预算机制,以及软件和硬件技术。这里描述的12个虚拟图书馆被称为开拓者。那些即将着手类似项目的人将希望熟悉这12个成功项目所提供的集体经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The President's Page Research methodology. FORTISSIMO! Binding. And Now For Something Completely Different
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1