The role of diabetes self-care education and practice in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

IF 0.5 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Primary Care Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5114/fmpcr.2021.110350
Olusegun Adams, Olabode M. Shabi, Busuyi Kolade Akinola, Olusegun E. Gabriel, Ibrahim S. Bello, Ololade Akinpelu
{"title":"The role of diabetes self-care education and practice in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)","authors":"Olusegun Adams, Olabode M. Shabi, Busuyi Kolade Akinola, Olusegun E. Gabriel, Ibrahim S. Bello, Ololade Akinpelu","doi":"10.5114/fmpcr.2021.110350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A – study design, B – Data Collection, C – Statistical Analysis, D – Data Interpretation, E – Manuscript Preparation, F – literature search, G – Funds Collection Background. diabetes self-care is yet to be incorporated into diabetes management policy, hence the need to establish its practice as an essential catalyst for good glycemic control in the management of diabetes patients. Objectives. This study was aimed at determining the role of diabetes self-care education (DSME) and practice in the management of T2DM patients. Material and methods. A hospital-based study was conducted on 120 adults with T2DM who had been presenting at the clinic for at least two months. The study participants were divided into two groups. Group 1 was the test group and had DSME, while group 2 served as the control. Data was collected using a questionnaire, and clinical parameters of glycemic control were measured both pre-and post-intervention period. Results. A significant relationship was found between diabetes education, diabetes self-care and glycemic control. This was demon strated by the significant difference in the proportion of those who achieved good FPG from 28.3% pre-intervention to 51.7% post--intervention ( p = 0.001); 2HPP from 30% to 46.7% ( p = 0.060) and HbA 1c from 53.3% to 85% ( p < 0.001) in the test group; while that of the control was FPG 18.3% to 30% ( p = 1.355), 2HPP 11.7% to 26.7% ( p = 0.369) and HbA 1c 43.3% to 53.3% ( p = 0.804). This showed a significant improvement in the glycemic control of the test group compared to the control group. Conclusions. We conclude that good knowledge and practice of diabetes self-care is relevant to the achievement of good glycemic control.","PeriodicalId":44481,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Primary Care Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/fmpcr.2021.110350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A – study design, B – Data Collection, C – Statistical Analysis, D – Data Interpretation, E – Manuscript Preparation, F – literature search, G – Funds Collection Background. diabetes self-care is yet to be incorporated into diabetes management policy, hence the need to establish its practice as an essential catalyst for good glycemic control in the management of diabetes patients. Objectives. This study was aimed at determining the role of diabetes self-care education (DSME) and practice in the management of T2DM patients. Material and methods. A hospital-based study was conducted on 120 adults with T2DM who had been presenting at the clinic for at least two months. The study participants were divided into two groups. Group 1 was the test group and had DSME, while group 2 served as the control. Data was collected using a questionnaire, and clinical parameters of glycemic control were measured both pre-and post-intervention period. Results. A significant relationship was found between diabetes education, diabetes self-care and glycemic control. This was demon strated by the significant difference in the proportion of those who achieved good FPG from 28.3% pre-intervention to 51.7% post--intervention ( p = 0.001); 2HPP from 30% to 46.7% ( p = 0.060) and HbA 1c from 53.3% to 85% ( p < 0.001) in the test group; while that of the control was FPG 18.3% to 30% ( p = 1.355), 2HPP 11.7% to 26.7% ( p = 0.369) and HbA 1c 43.3% to 53.3% ( p = 0.804). This showed a significant improvement in the glycemic control of the test group compared to the control group. Conclusions. We conclude that good knowledge and practice of diabetes self-care is relevant to the achievement of good glycemic control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病自我保健教育与实践在2型糖尿病(T2DM)治疗中的作用
A -研究设计,B -数据收集,C -统计分析,D -数据解释,E -稿件准备,F -文献检索,G -资金收集背景。糖尿病自我保健尚未纳入糖尿病管理政策,因此需要将其实践作为糖尿病患者管理中良好血糖控制的重要催化剂。目标。本研究旨在确定糖尿病自我保健教育(DSME)和实践在T2DM患者管理中的作用。材料和方法。一项以医院为基础的研究对120名在诊所就诊至少两个月的成年2型糖尿病患者进行了研究。研究参与者被分为两组。组1为试验组,存在DSME,组2为对照组。采用问卷调查收集数据,并测量干预前后血糖控制的临床参数。结果。糖尿病教育、糖尿病自我护理与血糖控制之间存在显著关系。获得良好FPG的比例从干预前的28.3%显著差异到干预后的51.7% (p = 0.001),证明了这一点;试验组hpp从30%降至46.7% (p = 0.060), HbA 1c从53.3%降至85% (p < 0.001);对照组FPG 18.3% ~ 30% (p = 1.355), 2HPP 11.7% ~ 26.7% (p = 0.369), HbA 1c 43.3% ~ 53.3% (p = 0.804)。这表明,与对照组相比,试验组的血糖控制有了显著改善。结论。我们得出结论,良好的糖尿病自我保健知识和实践与实现良好的血糖控制有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The significance of awareness about iron deficiency anaemia in its prevention among Iraqi pregnant women attending primary healthcare centres Pattern of platelet indices in hypertension: a single-centre experience for a primary care setting Association of mental health and medication adherence with blood pressure control in primary care patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study Violence against women with hearing disabilities in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia Patient satisfaction and health system responsiveness among attendants to family health centres and units affiliated with universal health insurance in Port Said Governorate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1