Marion Butler and American Populism

Craig Thurtell
{"title":"Marion Butler and American Populism","authors":"Craig Thurtell","doi":"10.5860/choice.41-2381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marion Butler and American Populism. By James L. Hunt. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003. Pp. xiii, 338. Acknowledgments, introduction, illustrations, notes, bibliography, index. $49.95.) The Peoples' (or Populist) party was one of the most significant third-party movements in American history, and Marion Butler served as national chairman during its climactic years. Opinions about his role certainly vary, but for better or worse, he was an important figure. Until now, however, he has lacked a biography. James L. Hunt has corrected this deficiency with a solid and thorough account of Butler's life. Hunt notes in his introduction that he harbors little sympathy for Butler either personally or politically, but his overall objective is to rescue his subject from the dominant portrayal, articulated most influentially by C. Vann Woodward and Lawrence Goodwyn, of a shifty opportunist out of step with true and principled Populism. Hunt traces Butler's rise from his political beginnings as a rural schoolteacher in Sampson County, North Carolina. There he became a locally prominent Alliance man, Democrat, and editor of the weekly Caucasian, who, at the age of twenty-eight, dominated the proceedings of the \"Alliance legislature\" of 1891. A reluctant convert to the Peoples' party in 1892, Butler nevertheless filled the vacuum created by the sudden death of L. L. Polk and soon dominated the state organization. By 1896, he was national chairman. Hunt judiciously recounts Butler's trials as he attempted to hold the party together during the contentious 1896 campaign, earning enduring enemies in the process. As the Populist movement deteriorated amid bitter recriminations after 1896, Butler remained a central figure both nationally and in North Carolina. Having reluctantly led the North Carolina Populists into unwieldy coalitions with the Republicans in 1894 and 1896 (he always preferred working with the Democrats), he would wage a rearguard action against the resurgent Redeemers, opposing their disfranchising amendment in 1900 on the grounds that there existed no threat of \"negro domination\" and proposing instead a bar to black officeholding. With the demise of Populism, Butler gravitated toward the Progressive wing of the Republican party, formally joining in 1904. There he remained for the rest of his life, waging a quixotic struggle to bend the party toward the Omaha platform. Hunt argues that the Omaha platform, with its demands for nationalization of the railroads and telegraph, the subtreasury, greenbacks, and the free coinage of silver, among others, became Butler's political anchor. …","PeriodicalId":51953,"journal":{"name":"ARKANSAS HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"63 1","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARKANSAS HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-2381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marion Butler and American Populism. By James L. Hunt. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003. Pp. xiii, 338. Acknowledgments, introduction, illustrations, notes, bibliography, index. $49.95.) The Peoples' (or Populist) party was one of the most significant third-party movements in American history, and Marion Butler served as national chairman during its climactic years. Opinions about his role certainly vary, but for better or worse, he was an important figure. Until now, however, he has lacked a biography. James L. Hunt has corrected this deficiency with a solid and thorough account of Butler's life. Hunt notes in his introduction that he harbors little sympathy for Butler either personally or politically, but his overall objective is to rescue his subject from the dominant portrayal, articulated most influentially by C. Vann Woodward and Lawrence Goodwyn, of a shifty opportunist out of step with true and principled Populism. Hunt traces Butler's rise from his political beginnings as a rural schoolteacher in Sampson County, North Carolina. There he became a locally prominent Alliance man, Democrat, and editor of the weekly Caucasian, who, at the age of twenty-eight, dominated the proceedings of the "Alliance legislature" of 1891. A reluctant convert to the Peoples' party in 1892, Butler nevertheless filled the vacuum created by the sudden death of L. L. Polk and soon dominated the state organization. By 1896, he was national chairman. Hunt judiciously recounts Butler's trials as he attempted to hold the party together during the contentious 1896 campaign, earning enduring enemies in the process. As the Populist movement deteriorated amid bitter recriminations after 1896, Butler remained a central figure both nationally and in North Carolina. Having reluctantly led the North Carolina Populists into unwieldy coalitions with the Republicans in 1894 and 1896 (he always preferred working with the Democrats), he would wage a rearguard action against the resurgent Redeemers, opposing their disfranchising amendment in 1900 on the grounds that there existed no threat of "negro domination" and proposing instead a bar to black officeholding. With the demise of Populism, Butler gravitated toward the Progressive wing of the Republican party, formally joining in 1904. There he remained for the rest of his life, waging a quixotic struggle to bend the party toward the Omaha platform. Hunt argues that the Omaha platform, with its demands for nationalization of the railroads and telegraph, the subtreasury, greenbacks, and the free coinage of silver, among others, became Butler's political anchor. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马里昂·巴特勒与美国民粹主义
马里昂·巴特勒与美国民粹主义。詹姆斯·l·亨特著。教堂山:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2003。第十三页,338页。致谢、引言、插图、注释、参考书目、索引。49.95美元)。人民党是美国历史上最重要的第三党运动之一,马里昂·巴特勒在该党的高潮时期担任全国主席。人们对他的角色当然有不同的看法,但无论好坏,他都是一个重要的人物。然而,直到现在,他还没有一本传记。詹姆斯·l·亨特(James L. Hunt)对巴特勒的生活进行了扎实而全面的描述,弥补了这一缺陷。亨特在前言中指出,无论在个人还是政治上,他对巴特勒都没有多少同情,但他的总体目标是将他的主题从c·范恩·伍德沃德和劳伦斯·古德温的主流形象中拯救出来,后者是一个狡猾的机会主义者,与真正有原则的民粹主义脱节。亨特追溯了巴特勒的政治生涯,他最初是北卡罗来纳州桑普森县的一名乡村教师。在那里,他成了当地著名的联盟成员、民主党人和《高加索人》周刊的编辑。他在28岁时就主导了1891年“联盟立法机构”的议事程序。1892年,巴特勒不情愿地加入了人民党,然而,他填补了波尔克突然去世造成的真空,并很快控制了国家组织。到1896年,他成为全国主席。亨特审慎地叙述了巴特勒在1896年有争议的竞选中试图团结民主党的经历,在这个过程中,他赢得了长久的敌人。1896年后,随着民粹主义运动在激烈的相互指责中恶化,巴特勒仍然是全国和北卡罗来纳州的核心人物。1894年和1896年,他不情愿地领导北卡罗来纳民粹主义者与共和党人结成了难以处理的联盟(他总是更喜欢与民主党人合作),他将对复活的救赎者党发起后卫行动,反对他们在1900年剥夺公民权的修正案,理由是不存在“黑人统治”的威胁,并建议禁止黑人担任公职。随着民粹主义的消亡,巴特勒转向共和党的进步派,于1904年正式加入。他在那里度过了余生,发动了一场堂吉诃德式的斗争,让共和党向奥马哈的纲领靠拢。亨特认为,奥马哈纲领要求将铁路和电报、副国库、美元和银币的自由铸造等国有化,这些都成为了巴特勒的政治支柱。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cotton Plantation South since the Civil War “Dedicated People” Little Rock Central High School’s Teachers during the Integration Crisis of 1957–1958 Prosperity and Peril: Arkansas in the New South, 1880–1900 “Between the Hawk & Buzzard”:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1