Tolkien and the Invention of Myth: A Reader

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE WESTERN FOLKLORE Pub Date : 2006-07-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.42-1432
A. Buccitelli
{"title":"Tolkien and the Invention of Myth: A Reader","authors":"A. Buccitelli","doi":"10.5860/choice.42-1432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tolkien and the Invention of Myth: A Reader. Edited by Jane Chance. (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2004. Pp. xx + 340, preface, acknowledgments, introduction, notes, bibliography, index. $35.00 cloth) While it seems that many professional folklorists have had their interest in the field initially sparked by the work of Joseph Campbell, W. B. Yeats, and J.R.R. Tolkien, most tend to deny their initial attraction to these writers, stigmatizing them as popularizers. Recognizing the scholarly problems associated with these writers, I nonetheless unabashedly proclaim my engagement with the works of all three, most especially that of J.R.R. Tolkien, a great source of inspiration to me and, I am sure, to many other young scholars. Of course the personal and emotional impact of Tolkien's work says nothing about its worth as a subject of academic study, and so the question is often posed whether Tolkien's work even deserves to be studied. This question has for years plagued scholars seeking to affirm the merits of the work. There have been fruitless and dull attempts to categorize Tolkien as a writer of children's literature or a producer of anomalously best-selling dime novels. Such attempts, tinged with embarrassment at the overwhelming popular success of Tolkien's fiction, are often accompanied by dismissive remarks made apparently in the hope that wishing will make it so. As recently as 2000, Harold Bloom pronounced The Lord of the Rings \"fated to become only an intricate Period Piece, while The Hobbit may well survive as Children's Literature\" (Bloom 1-2). When Bloom dispatched this thunderbolt, The Lord of the Rings had been robustly in print for forty-five years, The Hobbit for sixty-two. Despite the disapproval, over the past three decades scholars such as T. A. (Tom) Shippey, Verlyn Flieger, and Jane Chance have produced and inspired a growing body of scholarly Tolkien criticism. These three scholars, along with others, have begun to wade through voluminous Tolkien correspondence and scholarly research and writing and to unfold the major goals of Tolkien's work and the sources of his inspiration. In Tolkien and the Invention of Myth, the most recent addition to this body of scholarship, Jane Chance compiles eighteen essays that offer analysis of relations between Tolkien's writing and folklore, religion, and a wide range of historical literature. Inasmuch as the contributors are mostly approaching the work from the perspective of literary criticism (though of course most of the sources referred to, such as Beowulf, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, or the Kalevala, are literary renderings of what may well have been oral tradition), folklorists can anticipate that the volume contains little actual folklore or reference to folklore scholarship and that the contributors often make imprecise use of the technical terms \"myth\" and \"legend. …","PeriodicalId":44624,"journal":{"name":"WESTERN FOLKLORE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WESTERN FOLKLORE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Tolkien and the Invention of Myth: A Reader. Edited by Jane Chance. (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2004. Pp. xx + 340, preface, acknowledgments, introduction, notes, bibliography, index. $35.00 cloth) While it seems that many professional folklorists have had their interest in the field initially sparked by the work of Joseph Campbell, W. B. Yeats, and J.R.R. Tolkien, most tend to deny their initial attraction to these writers, stigmatizing them as popularizers. Recognizing the scholarly problems associated with these writers, I nonetheless unabashedly proclaim my engagement with the works of all three, most especially that of J.R.R. Tolkien, a great source of inspiration to me and, I am sure, to many other young scholars. Of course the personal and emotional impact of Tolkien's work says nothing about its worth as a subject of academic study, and so the question is often posed whether Tolkien's work even deserves to be studied. This question has for years plagued scholars seeking to affirm the merits of the work. There have been fruitless and dull attempts to categorize Tolkien as a writer of children's literature or a producer of anomalously best-selling dime novels. Such attempts, tinged with embarrassment at the overwhelming popular success of Tolkien's fiction, are often accompanied by dismissive remarks made apparently in the hope that wishing will make it so. As recently as 2000, Harold Bloom pronounced The Lord of the Rings "fated to become only an intricate Period Piece, while The Hobbit may well survive as Children's Literature" (Bloom 1-2). When Bloom dispatched this thunderbolt, The Lord of the Rings had been robustly in print for forty-five years, The Hobbit for sixty-two. Despite the disapproval, over the past three decades scholars such as T. A. (Tom) Shippey, Verlyn Flieger, and Jane Chance have produced and inspired a growing body of scholarly Tolkien criticism. These three scholars, along with others, have begun to wade through voluminous Tolkien correspondence and scholarly research and writing and to unfold the major goals of Tolkien's work and the sources of his inspiration. In Tolkien and the Invention of Myth, the most recent addition to this body of scholarship, Jane Chance compiles eighteen essays that offer analysis of relations between Tolkien's writing and folklore, religion, and a wide range of historical literature. Inasmuch as the contributors are mostly approaching the work from the perspective of literary criticism (though of course most of the sources referred to, such as Beowulf, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, or the Kalevala, are literary renderings of what may well have been oral tradition), folklorists can anticipate that the volume contains little actual folklore or reference to folklore scholarship and that the contributors often make imprecise use of the technical terms "myth" and "legend. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《托尔金与神话的发明:一个读者
《托尔金与神话的发明:一个读者》简·钱斯编辑。列克星敦:肯塔基大学出版社,2004。第xx + 340页,序言,致谢,引言,注释,参考书目,索引。虽然似乎许多专业民俗学家对这个领域的兴趣最初是由约瑟夫·坎贝尔、w·b·叶芝和J.R.R.托尔金的作品激发的,但大多数人倾向于否认他们最初对这些作家的吸引力,把他们污名化为普及者。认识到与这些作家有关的学术问题,尽管如此,我还是毫不讳言地宣布,我对这三位作家的作品都很感兴趣,尤其是J.R.R.托尔金的作品,他给了我很大的灵感,我相信,对许多其他年轻学者也是如此。当然,托尔金作品对个人和情感的影响并不能说明其作为学术研究主题的价值,因此人们经常会提出托尔金的作品是否值得研究的问题。多年来,这个问题一直困扰着试图肯定这项工作优点的学者。有人试图将托尔金归类为儿童文学作家或异常畅销的廉价小说的制作人,但结果都是徒劳的。托尔金的小说在大众中获得了压倒性的成功,这种尝试带着些许尴尬,往往伴随着轻蔑的评论,显然是希望通过愿望来实现。就在2000年,哈罗德·布鲁姆宣称《指环王》“注定只能成为一部错综复杂的古装作品,而《霍比特人》很可能作为儿童文学作品幸存下来”(布鲁姆1-2)。布鲁姆发出这一霹雳时,《指环王》已经出版了45年,《霍比特人》已经出版了62年。尽管不赞成,在过去的三十年里,像t.a. (Tom) Shippey, Verlyn Flieger和Jane Chance这样的学者已经产生并激发了越来越多的对托尔金的学术批评。这三位学者和其他人一起,开始研读托尔金的大量信件、学术研究和著作,并展开托尔金作品的主要目标和他的灵感来源。在《托尔金与神话的发明》一书中,简·钱斯收录了18篇文章,分析了托尔金的作品与民间传说、宗教和广泛的历史文学之间的关系。由于作者大多是从文学批评的角度来研究这本书的(当然,大多数参考文献,如贝奥武夫,高文爵士和绿骑士,或卡勒瓦拉,都是对口头传统的文学渲染),民俗学家可以预见,这本书中几乎没有实际的民间传说或参考民间传说学术,而且作者经常使用不精确的术语“神话”和“传说”。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
WESTERN FOLKLORE
WESTERN FOLKLORE FOLKLORE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Traditional and National Music of Scotland Cheremis Musical Styles Pachuco Dancing on the Color Line: African American Tricksters in Nineteenth-Century American Literature Science, Bread, and Circuses: Folkloristic Essays on Science for the Masses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1