Engaging Art: The Next Great Transformation of America's Cultural Life/The Arts of Democracy: Art, Public Culture, and the State

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE WESTERN FOLKLORE Pub Date : 2010-04-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.46-0973
Lisa L. Higgins, Teresa K. Hollingsworth
{"title":"Engaging Art: The Next Great Transformation of America's Cultural Life/The Arts of Democracy: Art, Public Culture, and the State","authors":"Lisa L. Higgins, Teresa K. Hollingsworth","doi":"10.5860/choice.46-0973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engaging Art: The Next Great Transformation of America's Cultural Life. Edited by Steven J. Tepper and Bill Ivey. (New York: Routledge, 2007. Pp. viii + 398, acknowledgments, introduction, tables, graphs, figures, chapter notes, chapter bibliographies, contributors, index. $125.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.); The Arts of Democracy: Art, Public Culture, and the State. Edited by Casey Nelson Blake. (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, and Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007. Pp. xvi + 362, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, illustrations, chapter notes, contributors, index. $49.95 cloth, $24.95 paper.)Is public art in the United States in afin de siecle or a renaissance? Two new anthologies provide ample means for reflection upon its past, present, and future: Engaging Art, edited by Steven J. Tepper and Bill Ivey, and The Arts of Democracy, edited by Casey Nelson Blake. Both volumes address the \"[v]igorous argument about the public life of artistic experience\" (Blake 2). The sociologists whose essays appear in Tepper and Ivey's collection examine \"arts participation\" in the twentieth century, from active to passive, and (they argue) back again. The historians and sociologists of Blake's collection take the concept to a more abstract plane as they consider the role of art and culture in \"the State.\" Both collections are recommended to folklorists, especially as we imagine how the policies of our recently inaugurated President and his policies may influence arts and culture.Engaging Art addresses two fundamental questions: \"I) What is the state of cultural participation and engagement in the United States; and 2) How is participation changing?\" (Tepper 364) . Commissioned to examine statistics and explore implications of the NEA Survey of Public Participation in the Arts, the volume explores the impact of the arts on the lives of Americans. The contributors provide an extensive historical overview of arts participation in the United States; employ quantitative and qualitative resources to illustrate growth and decline in major arts disciplines; and introduce discussions about art making, art consumption, and choice.Section Two, Investigating Non-traditional Audiences, Places, and Art Forms, explores arts participation in everyday life, focusing on religious groups, immigrant communities, and youth. Tepper and Ivey note that these constituencies are vigorous arts participants who blur the lines between audiences and artists. (This blurring, and its impact upon numbers, was illustrated when the present reviewers attended Tepper's September 2008 lecture in Chattanooga at a national meeting of state arts agency workers, in which some of those present lamented decreases in participation in fine-arts productions; shortly afterwards we squeezed into a packed concert of local old-time and bluegrass musicians. The juxtaposition highlighted for us key differences in definition of the terms audience, artist, and participation.) An important argument throughout Engaging Art is that technology has forever changed our understanding of participation. In Section Three, New Technology and Cultural Change, the essayists note that new technologies create new audiences, provide portals to lesser-known works of art, and encourage social-network sharing. Technology also fosters a return to what Ivey calls \"homemade art.\" A powerful and relatively inexpensive tool for the dissemination of work by non-professional artists, technology can increase choices for both artists and consumers. Still, not all potential participants may benefit equally; in the arts, as elsewhere, the digital divide persists.In Engaging Art we did not see folk arts addressed specifically, though Robert Wuthnow's essay \"Faithful Audiences: The Intersection of Art and Religion\" and Jennifer C. Lena and Daniel B. Cornfield's \"Immigrant Arts Participation\" are welcome illustrations, familiar to folklorists, of the book's explosive definition of \"arts participation. …","PeriodicalId":44624,"journal":{"name":"WESTERN FOLKLORE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WESTERN FOLKLORE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-0973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engaging Art: The Next Great Transformation of America's Cultural Life. Edited by Steven J. Tepper and Bill Ivey. (New York: Routledge, 2007. Pp. viii + 398, acknowledgments, introduction, tables, graphs, figures, chapter notes, chapter bibliographies, contributors, index. $125.00 cloth, $34.95 paper.); The Arts of Democracy: Art, Public Culture, and the State. Edited by Casey Nelson Blake. (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, and Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007. Pp. xvi + 362, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, illustrations, chapter notes, contributors, index. $49.95 cloth, $24.95 paper.)Is public art in the United States in afin de siecle or a renaissance? Two new anthologies provide ample means for reflection upon its past, present, and future: Engaging Art, edited by Steven J. Tepper and Bill Ivey, and The Arts of Democracy, edited by Casey Nelson Blake. Both volumes address the "[v]igorous argument about the public life of artistic experience" (Blake 2). The sociologists whose essays appear in Tepper and Ivey's collection examine "arts participation" in the twentieth century, from active to passive, and (they argue) back again. The historians and sociologists of Blake's collection take the concept to a more abstract plane as they consider the role of art and culture in "the State." Both collections are recommended to folklorists, especially as we imagine how the policies of our recently inaugurated President and his policies may influence arts and culture.Engaging Art addresses two fundamental questions: "I) What is the state of cultural participation and engagement in the United States; and 2) How is participation changing?" (Tepper 364) . Commissioned to examine statistics and explore implications of the NEA Survey of Public Participation in the Arts, the volume explores the impact of the arts on the lives of Americans. The contributors provide an extensive historical overview of arts participation in the United States; employ quantitative and qualitative resources to illustrate growth and decline in major arts disciplines; and introduce discussions about art making, art consumption, and choice.Section Two, Investigating Non-traditional Audiences, Places, and Art Forms, explores arts participation in everyday life, focusing on religious groups, immigrant communities, and youth. Tepper and Ivey note that these constituencies are vigorous arts participants who blur the lines between audiences and artists. (This blurring, and its impact upon numbers, was illustrated when the present reviewers attended Tepper's September 2008 lecture in Chattanooga at a national meeting of state arts agency workers, in which some of those present lamented decreases in participation in fine-arts productions; shortly afterwards we squeezed into a packed concert of local old-time and bluegrass musicians. The juxtaposition highlighted for us key differences in definition of the terms audience, artist, and participation.) An important argument throughout Engaging Art is that technology has forever changed our understanding of participation. In Section Three, New Technology and Cultural Change, the essayists note that new technologies create new audiences, provide portals to lesser-known works of art, and encourage social-network sharing. Technology also fosters a return to what Ivey calls "homemade art." A powerful and relatively inexpensive tool for the dissemination of work by non-professional artists, technology can increase choices for both artists and consumers. Still, not all potential participants may benefit equally; in the arts, as elsewhere, the digital divide persists.In Engaging Art we did not see folk arts addressed specifically, though Robert Wuthnow's essay "Faithful Audiences: The Intersection of Art and Religion" and Jennifer C. Lena and Daniel B. Cornfield's "Immigrant Arts Participation" are welcome illustrations, familiar to folklorists, of the book's explosive definition of "arts participation. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与艺术:美国文化生活的下一个伟大转变/民主艺术:艺术,公共文化和国家
参与艺术:美国文化生活的下一个伟大转变。史蒂文·j·泰珀和比尔·艾维编辑。(纽约:劳特利奇出版社,2007)第viii + 398页,致谢、引言、表格、图表、数字、章节注释、章节参考书目、贡献者、索引。布$125.00,纸$34.95);民主的艺术:艺术、公共文化和国家。凯西·纳尔逊·布莱克编辑。(华盛顿:伍德罗·威尔逊中心出版社,费城:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2007年)。第xvi + 362页,致谢,介绍,照片,插图,章节注释,贡献者,索引。布49.95美元,纸24.95美元。)美国的公共艺术是处于20世纪后期还是文艺复兴时期?两本新的选集为反思它的过去、现在和未来提供了充分的手段:史蒂文·j·泰珀和比尔·艾维编辑的《参与艺术》和凯西·纳尔逊·布莱克编辑的《民主的艺术》。这两卷书都讨论了“关于艺术经验的公共生活的激烈争论”(Blake 2)。社会学家的论文出现在泰珀和艾维的合集中,研究了20世纪的“艺术参与”,从主动到被动,然后(他们争论)又回来了。布莱克收藏的历史学家和社会学家在考虑艺术和文化在“国家”中的作用时,将这一概念提升到了一个更抽象的层面。这两个系列都推荐给民俗学家,特别是当我们想象我们最近就职的总统的政策和他的政策可能影响艺术和文化的时候。参与艺术解决了两个基本问题:“1)美国的文化参与和参与状况如何;2)参与情况如何变化?”(泰珀364)。委托检查统计数据和探索的影响公众参与艺术的NEA调查,该卷探讨艺术对美国人的生活的影响。作者提供了美国艺术参与的广泛历史概述;运用定量和定性的资源来说明主要艺术学科的增长和衰退;并介绍了关于艺术创作、艺术消费和艺术选择的讨论。第二部分,调查非传统的受众、场所和艺术形式,探讨艺术在日常生活中的参与,重点关注宗教团体、移民社区和青年。泰珀和艾维指出,这些支持者是活跃的艺术参与者,他们模糊了观众和艺术家之间的界限。(2008年9月,泰珀在查塔努加举行的一个州艺术机构工作人员全国会议上做了讲座,在场的一些人对参与美术制作的人数减少表示遗憾,这说明了这种模糊及其对数字的影响;不久之后,我们挤进了一场挤满了当地老派音乐家和蓝草音乐家的音乐会。这种并列突出了观众、艺术家和参与这三个术语定义上的关键差异。)贯穿《参与艺术》的一个重要论点是,技术永远改变了我们对参与的理解。在第三部分“新技术和文化变革”中,作者指出,新技术创造了新的受众,为鲜为人知的艺术作品提供了门户,并鼓励了社交网络分享。科技也促进了艾维所说的“自制艺术”的回归。作为非专业艺术家传播作品的强大且相对便宜的工具,技术可以增加艺术家和消费者的选择。不过,并不是所有的潜在参与者都能同样受益;与其他领域一样,在艺术领域,数字鸿沟依然存在。在《参与艺术》一书中,我们没有看到民间艺术的具体论述,尽管罗伯特·伍斯诺(Robert Wuthnow)的文章《忠实的观众:艺术与宗教的交集》和詹妮弗·c·莉娜(Jennifer C. Lena)和丹尼尔·b·康菲尔德(Daniel B. Cornfield)的“移民艺术参与”是民俗学家熟悉的、受欢迎的例证,说明了该书对“艺术参与”的爆炸式定义。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
WESTERN FOLKLORE
WESTERN FOLKLORE FOLKLORE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Traditional and National Music of Scotland Cheremis Musical Styles Pachuco Dancing on the Color Line: African American Tricksters in Nineteenth-Century American Literature Science, Bread, and Circuses: Folkloristic Essays on Science for the Masses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1