A proposed model of cognitive approach to assess clinical performance of dental students

Q4 Dentistry Journal of Stomatology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5114/JOS.2021.104700
A. Khalifah
{"title":"A proposed model of cognitive approach to assess clinical performance of dental students","authors":"A. Khalifah","doi":"10.5114/JOS.2021.104700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In dental education, assessment of students is of critical value to improve their performance in clinical settings. The assessment of students’ clinical performance includes various stages, where in certain cases, assessors en-counter challenges in providing final grades. This study sheds a light on assessment practices in clinical settings and focuses on assessors’ modulation of the whole cognitive process. The argument involves discussing critical thinking of assessors before, during, and after the event of assessment. Then, it analyzes a cognitive approach of assessment implied by assessors during students’ performance. Further, it proposes a model with step-by-step approach in decision-making along with different factors, which may strongly influence final grades. Four main stages were identified for the purpose of analysis, such as pre-decision, driver, primary decision, and communication stages. Each stage was supported by literary data, along with evidences worth consideration. Possible factors related to the assessment and assessors’ cognition that derived from literature were discussed in terms of the influence on the final decision towards more stringent or lenient decisions, following a temporal sequence for the proposed model events. Finally, both primary and secondary factors involved in each stage were presented.","PeriodicalId":35469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/JOS.2021.104700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In dental education, assessment of students is of critical value to improve their performance in clinical settings. The assessment of students’ clinical performance includes various stages, where in certain cases, assessors en-counter challenges in providing final grades. This study sheds a light on assessment practices in clinical settings and focuses on assessors’ modulation of the whole cognitive process. The argument involves discussing critical thinking of assessors before, during, and after the event of assessment. Then, it analyzes a cognitive approach of assessment implied by assessors during students’ performance. Further, it proposes a model with step-by-step approach in decision-making along with different factors, which may strongly influence final grades. Four main stages were identified for the purpose of analysis, such as pre-decision, driver, primary decision, and communication stages. Each stage was supported by literary data, along with evidences worth consideration. Possible factors related to the assessment and assessors’ cognition that derived from literature were discussed in terms of the influence on the final decision towards more stringent or lenient decisions, following a temporal sequence for the proposed model events. Finally, both primary and secondary factors involved in each stage were presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提出了一种评估牙科学生临床表现的认知方法模型
在牙科教育中,对学生的评估对于提高他们在临床环境中的表现至关重要。对学生临床表现的评估包括不同的阶段,在某些情况下,评估员在提供最终成绩时遇到了挑战。本研究揭示了评估实践在临床设置和重点评估的整个认知过程的调节。辩论涉及讨论评估者在评估之前、期间和之后的批判性思维。在此基础上,分析了评估者在学生表现过程中隐含的评估认知途径。在此基础上,提出了一个分步决策模型,并考虑了可能对最终成绩产生强烈影响的不同因素。为了分析的目的,确定了四个主要阶段,如预决策、驱动、主要决策和沟通阶段。每个阶段都有文献资料支持,以及值得考虑的证据。根据所提议的模型事件的时间顺序,讨论了与评估和评估人员从文献中获得的认知相关的可能因素,即对更严格或更宽松的最终决定的影响。最后,分析了各阶段所涉及的主要因素和次要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology
Journal of Stomatology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Role of nanotechnology in dentistry: a systematic review Investigation of cyto-toxicity of an innovative BIOfactor MTA product in different human cells: a pilot study Effectiveness of four home oral care products for primary enamel re-mineralization with early carious lesion: an in-vitro study Evaluation of bio-compatibility and effectiveness of propolis Tetragonula sp. as dental anti-microbial agent Patient under anti-clotting therapy in dental office – management, procedures, and complications: a survey research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1