Effect of Er: YAG laser on repair bond strength of a nano-hybrid composite

Q4 Dentistry Journal of Stomatology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/jos.2022.117408
Ozge Celiksoz, N. Yilmaz, Esma Balin
{"title":"Effect of Er: YAG laser on repair bond strength of a nano-hybrid composite","authors":"Ozge Celiksoz, N. Yilmaz, Esma Balin","doi":"10.5114/jos.2022.117408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: advancements adhesion technology, invasive approaches popularity in today’s dentistry. their aesthetic and mechanical properties, composite materials are widely used in clinical practice. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether surface pre-treatment with Er: YAG laser and bur, and application of various universal adhesives is effective on the repair bond strength of thermally aged nano-hybrid composite restorations. Material and methods: A total of 96 disc-shaped specimens were made from a nano-hybrid resin composite material (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic, Kuraray), using standard size (14 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness) silicon molds. Thermally aged composite disc specimens were assigned randomly into 2 equal groups according to pre-treatment methods (bur or Er: YAG laser). Then, specimens were divided into 3 sub-groups according to used universal adhesive: GPB (G-Premio BOND, GC), CUB (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond, Kuraray), and ABU (All-Bond Universal, Bisco, Inc.). They were aged 5,000 thermocycles and subjected to a shear bond strength test. Data were analyzed statistically, with p = 0.05. Results: The groups that received pre-treated with Er: YAG laser showed statistically higher values of bond strength than the groups pre-treated with burs ( p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups pre-treated with Er: YAG laser. For the groups pre-treated with bur, there were no statistically significant differences between B-CUB (Bur/Clearfil Universal Bond) and B-ABU (Bur/All-Bond Universal) groups ( p > 0.05). B-GPB (Bur/G-Premio Bond) group exhibited the lowest bond strength ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: Er: YAG lasers may be used as alternative method used for pre-treatment for repairing nanohybrid composite restorations. Silane-containing universal adhesives do not have better repair bond strength than other universal adhesives.","PeriodicalId":35469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2022.117408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: advancements adhesion technology, invasive approaches popularity in today’s dentistry. their aesthetic and mechanical properties, composite materials are widely used in clinical practice. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether surface pre-treatment with Er: YAG laser and bur, and application of various universal adhesives is effective on the repair bond strength of thermally aged nano-hybrid composite restorations. Material and methods: A total of 96 disc-shaped specimens were made from a nano-hybrid resin composite material (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic, Kuraray), using standard size (14 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness) silicon molds. Thermally aged composite disc specimens were assigned randomly into 2 equal groups according to pre-treatment methods (bur or Er: YAG laser). Then, specimens were divided into 3 sub-groups according to used universal adhesive: GPB (G-Premio BOND, GC), CUB (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond, Kuraray), and ABU (All-Bond Universal, Bisco, Inc.). They were aged 5,000 thermocycles and subjected to a shear bond strength test. Data were analyzed statistically, with p = 0.05. Results: The groups that received pre-treated with Er: YAG laser showed statistically higher values of bond strength than the groups pre-treated with burs ( p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups pre-treated with Er: YAG laser. For the groups pre-treated with bur, there were no statistically significant differences between B-CUB (Bur/Clearfil Universal Bond) and B-ABU (Bur/All-Bond Universal) groups ( p > 0.05). B-GPB (Bur/G-Premio Bond) group exhibited the lowest bond strength ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: Er: YAG lasers may be used as alternative method used for pre-treatment for repairing nanohybrid composite restorations. Silane-containing universal adhesives do not have better repair bond strength than other universal adhesives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Er: YAG激光对纳米杂化复合材料修复结合强度的影响
简介:先进的黏附技术,侵入性方法在今天的牙科流行。复合材料具有良好的美学和力学性能,被广泛应用于临床实践。目的:本研究旨在评价Er: YAG激光和bur表面预处理以及各种通用胶粘剂的应用对热老化纳米杂化复合材料修复体的修复结合强度是否有效。材料与方法:采用标准尺寸(直径14 mm ×厚度2 mm)硅模,采用纳米杂化树脂复合材料(Clearfil Majesty美学,Kuraray)制作96个圆盘状样品。根据预处理方法(bur或Er: YAG激光),将热老化的复合光盘试样随机分为2组。然后,根据使用的通用粘合剂将标本分为3个亚组:GPB (G-Premio BOND, GC), CUB (CLEARFIL™universal BOND, Kuraray)和ABU (All-Bond universal, Bisco, Inc.)。它们进行了5000次热循环老化,并进行了剪切粘结强度测试。对资料进行统计学分析,p = 0.05。结果:Er: YAG激光预处理组黏结强度明显高于毛刺预处理组(p < 0.05)。Er: YAG激光预处理组间差异无统计学意义。对于bur预处理组,B-CUB (bur /Clearfil Universal Bond)组与B-ABU (bur /All-Bond Universal)组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。B-GPB (Bur/G-Premio Bond)组的结合强度最低(p < 0.05)。结论:Er: YAG激光可作为纳米复合材料修复体预处理的替代方法。含硅烷万能胶的修复粘结强度并不比其他万能胶好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology
Journal of Stomatology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Role of nanotechnology in dentistry: a systematic review Investigation of cyto-toxicity of an innovative BIOfactor MTA product in different human cells: a pilot study Effectiveness of four home oral care products for primary enamel re-mineralization with early carious lesion: an in-vitro study Evaluation of bio-compatibility and effectiveness of propolis Tetragonula sp. as dental anti-microbial agent Patient under anti-clotting therapy in dental office – management, procedures, and complications: a survey research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1