Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power

Q3 Arts and Humanities Parameters Pub Date : 2013-06-22 DOI:10.5860/choice.50-1148
Charles D Allen
{"title":"Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power","authors":"Charles D Allen","doi":"10.5860/choice.50-1148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power By Rachel Maddow New York: Crown, 2012 276 pages $25.00 [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Rachel Maddow is probably the best well-known woman commentator in the twenty-first century. Host of The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC, her brand is one of biting humor and striking analysis from a liberal perspective. I expect she would be amused and flattered that a review of her book, Drift, is included in Parameters. To dismiss Maddow out-of-hand as a liberal policy wonk would be imprudent given her credentials as a Rhodes Scholar who holds a Doctorate of Philosophy in Politics from Oxford University. Drift is her first book and could easily have been written as a string of half-hour commentaries on the state of the US military. Given the nine chapters with prologue and epilogue, this would fit the format of a week-long series for her news show. As the \"Unmooring\" title suggests, Maddow's premise is the manifestation of American military power is insufficiently linked to the national discourse on its use. Her concerns are American military power has migrated from that envisioned by the founding fathers, debate between the executive and legislative branches on its use is ineffective, and, perhaps most important, there is a dangerous lack of engagement and accountability with the American people. Accordingly, Maddow opens the book with a 1795 quote from then-Congressman (and \"Father of the Constitution\") James Madison, \"Of all enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded.... War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes.... In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended ... and all the means of seducing the minds are added to those of subduing the force of the people.\" Her focus is on military power that emerged with the national experience of the Vietnam War. Two key items sprung from that conflict--the restructuring of the Army Guard and Reserve by then-Chief of Staff Creighton Abrams and the War Powers Resolution of 1973--serve as the foundation of Maddow's discourse on the American attitude toward persistent conflict and war. She contends it is, \"as if peace ... made us edgy, as if we no longer knew, absent an armed conflict, how to be our best selves.\" Her analysis of modern US history has four main tenets that interested this reviewer, which individually and collectively decoupled the US military from its society. The reforms of General Abrams were designed to ensure that citizen-soldiers were inextricably bound to deployments for major military operations, such that when the president and Congress committed to war, the nation was also committed across a wide swath of its population. Concurrently, the War Powers Resolution was a clear attempt by Congress to check the presidential power to commit US forces without informing Congress and obtaining its authorization. While enacted during the term of a Republican president (Richard Nixon), the challenge to executive power existed prior to and since with presidents of both political parties. Maddow provides several examples from Grenada, Iraq, and Bosnia to contemporary operations. The restructuring of the US military as a volunteer force with limited numbers to perform the \"inherently governmental in nature\" functions of warfighting led to the understandable emergence of outsourcing other functions with programs such as the Logistics Civilian Augmentation Program (LOGCAP). …","PeriodicalId":35242,"journal":{"name":"Parameters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parameters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-1148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power By Rachel Maddow New York: Crown, 2012 276 pages $25.00 [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Rachel Maddow is probably the best well-known woman commentator in the twenty-first century. Host of The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC, her brand is one of biting humor and striking analysis from a liberal perspective. I expect she would be amused and flattered that a review of her book, Drift, is included in Parameters. To dismiss Maddow out-of-hand as a liberal policy wonk would be imprudent given her credentials as a Rhodes Scholar who holds a Doctorate of Philosophy in Politics from Oxford University. Drift is her first book and could easily have been written as a string of half-hour commentaries on the state of the US military. Given the nine chapters with prologue and epilogue, this would fit the format of a week-long series for her news show. As the "Unmooring" title suggests, Maddow's premise is the manifestation of American military power is insufficiently linked to the national discourse on its use. Her concerns are American military power has migrated from that envisioned by the founding fathers, debate between the executive and legislative branches on its use is ineffective, and, perhaps most important, there is a dangerous lack of engagement and accountability with the American people. Accordingly, Maddow opens the book with a 1795 quote from then-Congressman (and "Father of the Constitution") James Madison, "Of all enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded.... War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes.... In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended ... and all the means of seducing the minds are added to those of subduing the force of the people." Her focus is on military power that emerged with the national experience of the Vietnam War. Two key items sprung from that conflict--the restructuring of the Army Guard and Reserve by then-Chief of Staff Creighton Abrams and the War Powers Resolution of 1973--serve as the foundation of Maddow's discourse on the American attitude toward persistent conflict and war. She contends it is, "as if peace ... made us edgy, as if we no longer knew, absent an armed conflict, how to be our best selves." Her analysis of modern US history has four main tenets that interested this reviewer, which individually and collectively decoupled the US military from its society. The reforms of General Abrams were designed to ensure that citizen-soldiers were inextricably bound to deployments for major military operations, such that when the president and Congress committed to war, the nation was also committed across a wide swath of its population. Concurrently, the War Powers Resolution was a clear attempt by Congress to check the presidential power to commit US forces without informing Congress and obtaining its authorization. While enacted during the term of a Republican president (Richard Nixon), the challenge to executive power existed prior to and since with presidents of both political parties. Maddow provides several examples from Grenada, Iraq, and Bosnia to contemporary operations. The restructuring of the US military as a volunteer force with limited numbers to perform the "inherently governmental in nature" functions of warfighting led to the understandable emergence of outsourcing other functions with programs such as the Logistics Civilian Augmentation Program (LOGCAP). …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
漂移:美国军事力量的松动
《漂移:美国军事力量的解体》雷切尔·马多著纽约:皇冠出版社,2012年,276页25美元[插图遗漏]雷切尔·马多可能是21世纪最著名的女性评论员。她是MSNBC电视台《雷切尔·马多秀》(The Rachel Maddow Show)的主持人,她的招牌是辛辣的幽默和从自由主义角度进行的引人注目的分析。我想她会觉得有趣和受宠若惊,因为对她的书《漂移》的评论被收录在《参数》中。鉴于马多拥有牛津大学(Oxford University)政治哲学博士学位、获得罗德奖学金(Rhodes Scholar)的资格,把她视为自由派政策专家的做法是轻率的。《漂移》是她的第一本书,很容易写成一连串对美国军事状况的半小时评论。考虑到包含开场白和尾声的九章,这将适合她的新闻节目长达一周的系列节目。正如《解除系泊》的标题所暗示的那样,马多的前提是,美国军事力量的表现与有关其使用的国家话语联系不足。她担心的是,美国的军事力量已经偏离了开国元勋们的设想,行政和立法部门之间关于军事力量使用的辩论是无效的,也许最重要的是,美国人民缺乏参与和问责制,这是一种危险的现象。因此,马多在书的开头引用了1795年时任国会议员(“宪法之父”)詹姆斯·麦迪逊的话:“在所有公共自由的敌人中,战争也许是最可怕的....。战争是军队之母;由此产生债务和税收....在战争中,行政部门的自由裁量权也得到了扩展。所有引诱思想的手段都加在了征服人民力量的手段上。”她关注的是随着越南战争的国家经验而产生的军事力量。这场冲突中产生的两个关键项目——当时的参谋长克赖顿·艾布拉姆斯(Creighton Abrams)对陆军警卫队和预备役部队的重组,以及1973年的《战争权力决议》(War Powers Resolution)——构成了马多关于美国对持续冲突和战争态度的论述的基础。她认为,“就好像和平……让我们焦躁不安,仿佛在没有武装冲突的情况下,我们不再知道如何做最好的自己。”她对美国现代史的分析有四个主要原则引起了笔者的兴趣,这些原则单独或集体地将美国军队与社会分离开来。艾布拉姆斯将军的改革旨在确保公民士兵不可避免地与重大军事行动的部署联系在一起,这样当总统和国会致力于战争时,国家也会在其广大人口中投入。与此同时,《战争权力决议》显然是国会试图制衡总统在未通知国会并获得其授权的情况下派遣美国军队的权力。虽然在共和党总统(理查德·尼克松)任期内颁布,但对行政权力的挑战在两党总统之前和之后都存在。Maddow提供了从格林纳达、伊拉克和波斯尼亚到当代军事行动的几个例子。美军重组为一支人数有限的志愿部队,以执行“本质上是政府的”作战职能,这导致了可以理解的外包其他职能的出现,如后勤民用增强计划(LOGCAP)。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parameters
Parameters Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Was the Russian Invasion of Ukraine a Failure of Western Deterrence? Contributor's Guidelines From the Editor in Chief Ukraine’s Lessons for Future Combat: Unmanned Aerial Systems and Deep Strike Parameters 2023-24 Winter Demi-Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1