Saying It With Songs: Popular Music And The Coming Of Sound To Hollywood Cinema by Katherine Spring (review)

Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.52-0729
K. Donnelly
{"title":"Saying It With Songs: Popular Music And The Coming Of Sound To Hollywood Cinema by Katherine Spring (review)","authors":"K. Donnelly","doi":"10.5860/choice.52-0729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SAYING IT WITH SONGS: POPULAR MUSIC AND THE COMING OF SOUND TO HOLLYWOOD CINEMA By Katherine Spring Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 256 pp.REVIEWED BY K.J. DONNELLYI was extremely excited to receive Katherine Springs book, Saying It With Songs, greatly anticipating an engaging and detailed study that enlightened me on the turbulent history of the film and music industries during the \"transitional\" years from silent to sound-recorded cinema. I'm pleased to say that the book did not disappoint. Indeed, it was an utter joy to read. This is no simple \"history of the period\" book. All of the issues it debates are relevant today. Indeed, the sections dealing with business relations between film and music industries, musical copyright and synergetic cross-publicity not only gave me great insight into the 1920s and beyond, but also gave me a greater understanding of the current manifestations of these and how their currents have remained on tracks largely established in the third decade of the twentieth century Spring quotes an article in 1929 which asked, \"It is now a question as to which has absorbed which. Is the motion picture industry a subsidiary of the music publicity business-or have film producers gone into the business of making songs?\" Indeed, this question might well have been asked on and off ever since.Scholars increasingly have registered how historically defining and aesthetically bold the transition period between silent and sound cinema (both poor and misleading terms) actually was. Spring traces the industrial developments between the film and music industries in the 1920s, while attending to how this affected the product. In the late 1920s, films bent to fit the requirement of songs appearing. As Spring notes, plausibility was heavily strained on occasions, although by the end of the decade songs increasingly were integrated with the classical norms of Hollywood storytelling and diegetic construction. This meant that they were shifted more towards title sequences, set in locations where songs might appear, integrated with the non-diegetic score, or corralled in the more musically-defined \"film musical,\" which stabilized around 1933.It is clear that the 1920s and early 1930s were a crucial decade for film history, with business, technological and aesthetic developments reconfiguring the Hollywood film industry. Spring's book, along with Michael Slowik's recent Afler the Silents: Hollywood Film Music in the Early Sound Era, 1926-1934 (Columbia University Press, 2013) illustrates how far the transition to recorded sound from live sound was not simply about dialogue and just how central musical concerns were in events. Indeed, while Slowik looks at the now less certain notion that film underscores emerged in Hollywood in the early 1930s, Spring details the startling degree of collaboration and coherence between film and music as industries and how this is directly evident in their products. Indeed, as she notes, the sheer volume of songs appearing in films in the late 1920s is really overwhelming. Few mainstream films seemingly managed to escape at least one. While musicals derived directly from Broadway accounted for a good proportion of these films, a surprising number were genre films and it is upon these that this engaging and authoritative study is focused.As her central and convincing argument, Spring illustrates how the changes to the relationship of the film and music industries in the late 1920s had a significant influence on the form of the Hollywood sound film. She also notes that the notion of the \"musical\" was not straightforward once the sound film arrived. Many films included only a song or two, while others included more and still were not considered \"musicals.\" Indeed, we have tended to superimpose later notions derived from the heavily compartmentalized production and publicity of 1930s Hollywood studios. Spring's interest lies more in films that use songs rather than films based on Broadway stage shows. …","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.52-0729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SAYING IT WITH SONGS: POPULAR MUSIC AND THE COMING OF SOUND TO HOLLYWOOD CINEMA By Katherine Spring Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 256 pp.REVIEWED BY K.J. DONNELLYI was extremely excited to receive Katherine Springs book, Saying It With Songs, greatly anticipating an engaging and detailed study that enlightened me on the turbulent history of the film and music industries during the "transitional" years from silent to sound-recorded cinema. I'm pleased to say that the book did not disappoint. Indeed, it was an utter joy to read. This is no simple "history of the period" book. All of the issues it debates are relevant today. Indeed, the sections dealing with business relations between film and music industries, musical copyright and synergetic cross-publicity not only gave me great insight into the 1920s and beyond, but also gave me a greater understanding of the current manifestations of these and how their currents have remained on tracks largely established in the third decade of the twentieth century Spring quotes an article in 1929 which asked, "It is now a question as to which has absorbed which. Is the motion picture industry a subsidiary of the music publicity business-or have film producers gone into the business of making songs?" Indeed, this question might well have been asked on and off ever since.Scholars increasingly have registered how historically defining and aesthetically bold the transition period between silent and sound cinema (both poor and misleading terms) actually was. Spring traces the industrial developments between the film and music industries in the 1920s, while attending to how this affected the product. In the late 1920s, films bent to fit the requirement of songs appearing. As Spring notes, plausibility was heavily strained on occasions, although by the end of the decade songs increasingly were integrated with the classical norms of Hollywood storytelling and diegetic construction. This meant that they were shifted more towards title sequences, set in locations where songs might appear, integrated with the non-diegetic score, or corralled in the more musically-defined "film musical," which stabilized around 1933.It is clear that the 1920s and early 1930s were a crucial decade for film history, with business, technological and aesthetic developments reconfiguring the Hollywood film industry. Spring's book, along with Michael Slowik's recent Afler the Silents: Hollywood Film Music in the Early Sound Era, 1926-1934 (Columbia University Press, 2013) illustrates how far the transition to recorded sound from live sound was not simply about dialogue and just how central musical concerns were in events. Indeed, while Slowik looks at the now less certain notion that film underscores emerged in Hollywood in the early 1930s, Spring details the startling degree of collaboration and coherence between film and music as industries and how this is directly evident in their products. Indeed, as she notes, the sheer volume of songs appearing in films in the late 1920s is really overwhelming. Few mainstream films seemingly managed to escape at least one. While musicals derived directly from Broadway accounted for a good proportion of these films, a surprising number were genre films and it is upon these that this engaging and authoritative study is focused.As her central and convincing argument, Spring illustrates how the changes to the relationship of the film and music industries in the late 1920s had a significant influence on the form of the Hollywood sound film. She also notes that the notion of the "musical" was not straightforward once the sound film arrived. Many films included only a song or two, while others included more and still were not considered "musicals." Indeed, we have tended to superimpose later notions derived from the heavily compartmentalized production and publicity of 1930s Hollywood studios. Spring's interest lies more in films that use songs rather than films based on Broadway stage shows. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
《用歌声诉说:流行音乐与声音进入好莱坞电影》凯瑟琳·斯普林著(书评)
《用歌声说:流行音乐和声音进入好莱坞电影》凯瑟琳·斯普林斯著牛津:牛津大学出版社,2013年,256页。我非常兴奋地收到凯瑟琳·斯普林斯的书《用歌声说》,非常期待一本引人入胜的详细研究,它能启发我了解从无声电影到有声电影“过渡”时期电影和音乐行业的动荡历史。我很高兴地说,这本书没有让人失望。的确,这是一种阅读的乐趣。这不是一本简单的“那个时期的历史”书。它讨论的所有问题都与今天相关。事实上,部分处理商业电影和音乐产业的关系,音乐版权和协同作用的cross-publicity 1920年代不仅给了我伟大的见解,但也给了我一个更好地了解当前的这些表现,以及电流仍在跟踪主要成立于20世纪的第三个十年1929年春天引用的一篇文章中问道,“现在一个问题了。电影行业是音乐宣传行业的附属行业吗?还是电影制作人已经进入了歌曲制作行业?”事实上,从那以后,这个问题很可能被断断续续地问到。学者们越来越多地注意到,无声电影和有声电影(两者都是拙劣和误导的术语)之间的过渡时期实际上是多么具有历史意义和美学上的大胆。Spring追溯了20世纪20年代电影和音乐产业之间的工业发展,同时关注了这对产品的影响。在20世纪20年代后期,电影倾向于满足歌曲出现的要求。正如斯普林所指出的,尽管到九十年代末,歌曲越来越多地融入了好莱坞叙事和叙事结构的经典规范,但在某些情况下,歌曲的合理性受到了严重的限制。这意味着它们更倾向于片名序列,设置在可能出现歌曲的地方,与非叙事配乐相结合,或者被集中在更有音乐定义的“电影音乐剧”中,这在1933年左右稳定下来。很明显,20世纪20年代和30年代初是电影史上至关重要的十年,商业、技术和美学的发展重新配置了好莱坞电影业。斯普林的书,以及迈克尔·斯洛维克最近的《沉默之后:早期声音时代的好莱坞电影音乐,1926-1934》(哥伦比亚大学出版社,2013年)说明了从现场声音到录制声音的过渡是多么遥远,不仅仅是关于对话,也说明了音乐在事件中的中心地位。事实上,斯洛维克关注的是20世纪30年代早期好莱坞出现的电影强调这一如今不那么确定的概念,而斯普林则详细描述了电影和音乐作为产业之间惊人的合作和一致性,以及这一点如何直接体现在它们的产品中。事实上,正如她所指出的,20世纪20年代后期电影中出现的歌曲数量实在是太多了。几乎没有主流电影能躲过至少一个。虽然直接源自百老汇的音乐剧占了这些电影的很大比例,但令人惊讶的是,类型电影的数量也很大,而这正是这项引人入胜且权威的研究的重点。作为她的核心和令人信服的论点,斯普林说明了20世纪20年代后期电影和音乐产业关系的变化如何对好莱坞有声电影的形式产生重大影响。她还指出,一旦有声电影问世,“音乐剧”的概念就不那么简单了。许多电影只包含一两首歌,而其他电影则包含更多,但仍不被视为“音乐剧”。事实上,我们倾向于把后来的观念叠加在一起,这些观念来自于20世纪30年代好莱坞电影公司严重分割的制作和宣传。Spring的兴趣更多地在于歌曲电影,而不是基于百老汇舞台表演的电影。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1