Prognostic assessment in palliative cancer care: is there a difference between adult and older patients?

Simone Garruth dos Santos Machado Sampaio, L. Oliveira, K. Rosa
{"title":"Prognostic assessment in palliative cancer care: is there a difference between adult and older patients?","authors":"Simone Garruth dos Santos Machado Sampaio, L. Oliveira, K. Rosa","doi":"10.53886/gga.e0210044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To compare factors associated with death in adults and older people with advanced cancer who were hospitalized in a palliative care unit (PCU). METHODS: Case-control study with patients (adults vs older people) admitted to a PCU of National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA), in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Logistic regressions (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [95%CI]) were used to identify factors associated with death. RESULTS: The study included 205 patients, most of which were aged over 60 years old (60.5%). Among the adult patients, a Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 40% (OR 2.54 [95%CI 1.11–3.45]) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]) were risk factors for death, while albumin (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.12–0.78]) was a protective factor. Among older patients, NLR (OR: 1.13 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.17]), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) 1 and 2 (OR 4.66 [95%CI 1.35–16.06]), CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR) (OR 1.27 [95%CI 1.03–1.58]), and nutritional risk (OR 1.11 [95%CI 1.03–1.19]) were risk factors, whereas albumin (OR 0.23 [95%CI 0.09–0.57]) was a protective factor against death. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors differed between groups. The NLR was a risk factor, and albumin was a protective factor regarding death in both groups. Additionally, CRP, mGPS, CAR, and nutritional risk were associated with an increased risk of death only among older people.","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e0210044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare factors associated with death in adults and older people with advanced cancer who were hospitalized in a palliative care unit (PCU). METHODS: Case-control study with patients (adults vs older people) admitted to a PCU of National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA), in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Logistic regressions (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [95%CI]) were used to identify factors associated with death. RESULTS: The study included 205 patients, most of which were aged over 60 years old (60.5%). Among the adult patients, a Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 40% (OR 2.54 [95%CI 1.11–3.45]) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]) were risk factors for death, while albumin (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.12–0.78]) was a protective factor. Among older patients, NLR (OR: 1.13 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.17]), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) 1 and 2 (OR 4.66 [95%CI 1.35–16.06]), CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR) (OR 1.27 [95%CI 1.03–1.58]), and nutritional risk (OR 1.11 [95%CI 1.03–1.19]) were risk factors, whereas albumin (OR 0.23 [95%CI 0.09–0.57]) was a protective factor against death. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors differed between groups. The NLR was a risk factor, and albumin was a protective factor regarding death in both groups. Additionally, CRP, mGPS, CAR, and nutritional risk were associated with an increased risk of death only among older people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姑息性癌症治疗的预后评估:成人和老年患者之间有区别吗?
目的:比较在姑息治疗病房(PCU)住院的成人和老年晚期癌症患者的死亡相关因素。方法:在巴西里约热内卢巴西国家癌症研究所josise Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) PCU住院的患者(成人与老年人)进行病例对照研究。采用Logistic回归(优势比[OR]和95%可信区间[95% ci])确定与死亡相关的因素。结果:纳入205例患者,年龄≥60岁者占60.5%。成人患者中,Karnofsky Performance Status≤40% (OR 2.54 [95%CI 1.11-3.45])和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02-1.24])是死亡的危险因素,白蛋白(OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.12-0.78])是死亡的保护因素。在老年患者中,NLR (OR: 1.13 [95%CI 1.02-1.24])、c反应蛋白(CRP) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02-1.17])、改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS) 1和2 (OR 4.66 [95%CI 1.35-16.06])、CRP-白蛋白比(CAR) (OR 1.27 [95%CI 1.03-1.58])和营养风险(OR 1.11 [95%CI 1.03-1.19])是危险因素,而白蛋白(OR 0.23 [95%CI 0.09-0.57])是死亡的保护因素。结论:两组预后因素存在差异。NLR是两组死亡的危险因素,白蛋白是两组死亡的保护因素。此外,CRP、mGPS、CAR和营养风险仅在老年人中与死亡风险增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Polypharmacy and drug classes in fall risk among older adults Videoconference assessment of functional and cognitive measures in Brazilian older adults: a reliability and feasibility study Oral disorders among older Chileans: prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability Interventions used by health professionals in older adults with low levels of health literacy: a scoping review Oral health-related quality of life of older adults living in long-term care facilities and its association with dental prosthesis use and condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1