Flowmetric Assessment of the Free Right Internal Thoracic Artery Anastomosed Proximally to a Saphenous Vein Graft to Revascularize the Left Coronary Artery System

M. Hosono, H. Yasumoto, Shintaro Kuwauchi, N. Taniguchi, Tomohiko Uetsuki, T. Okada, S. Kanemoto, N. Zempo, N. Minato, K. Kawazoe
{"title":"Flowmetric Assessment of the Free Right Internal Thoracic Artery Anastomosed Proximally to a Saphenous Vein Graft to Revascularize the Left Coronary Artery System","authors":"M. Hosono, H. Yasumoto, Shintaro Kuwauchi, N. Taniguchi, Tomohiko Uetsuki, T. Okada, S. Kanemoto, N. Zempo, N. Minato, K. Kawazoe","doi":"10.7793/jcad.26.20-00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), arterial grafts provide superior results compared with saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). Among arterial grafts, using bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts is associated with good survival benefits and graft patency-. However, in-situ right internal thoracic artery grafting (RITA) is used for limited coronary arteries because of the insufficient length. In contrast, free RITA grafts can be used for sequential multiple grafting and grafting to the distal branches. Therefore, in multi-vessels bypass grafting, free RITA grafting can be more feasible than in-situ RITA. In addition, we avoid retrosternal in-situ RITA crossover routing due to concerns about the potential risks of damage to the RITA in re-sternotomy or deep sternal wound infection. For these reasons, the free RITA is used as the second graft alternative in our institute, except in older patients. When using free RITAs, there are several alternatives as a proximal anastomotic site, such as the aorta, a left internal thoracic artery graft (LITA), a radial artery graft, or a SVG-. Among these anastomotic sites, SVGs are technically the most simple, and we anastomose a free RITA to the hood of the SVG close to the suture line of its aortic anastomosis. In this technique, there is concern regarding a flow-steal phenomenon between the two grafts as in composite Y-grafting with the LITA . However, correlations in the graft flow between a free RITA and an SVG have not been clarified. We report the operative results following CABG using free RITAs in our institute and the results of a flow measurement study of proximally anastomosing a free RITA to the hood of a SVG at its aortic anastomosis.","PeriodicalId":73692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of coronary artery disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7793/jcad.26.20-00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), arterial grafts provide superior results compared with saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). Among arterial grafts, using bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts is associated with good survival benefits and graft patency-. However, in-situ right internal thoracic artery grafting (RITA) is used for limited coronary arteries because of the insufficient length. In contrast, free RITA grafts can be used for sequential multiple grafting and grafting to the distal branches. Therefore, in multi-vessels bypass grafting, free RITA grafting can be more feasible than in-situ RITA. In addition, we avoid retrosternal in-situ RITA crossover routing due to concerns about the potential risks of damage to the RITA in re-sternotomy or deep sternal wound infection. For these reasons, the free RITA is used as the second graft alternative in our institute, except in older patients. When using free RITAs, there are several alternatives as a proximal anastomotic site, such as the aorta, a left internal thoracic artery graft (LITA), a radial artery graft, or a SVG-. Among these anastomotic sites, SVGs are technically the most simple, and we anastomose a free RITA to the hood of the SVG close to the suture line of its aortic anastomosis. In this technique, there is concern regarding a flow-steal phenomenon between the two grafts as in composite Y-grafting with the LITA . However, correlations in the graft flow between a free RITA and an SVG have not been clarified. We report the operative results following CABG using free RITAs in our institute and the results of a flow measurement study of proximally anastomosing a free RITA to the hood of a SVG at its aortic anastomosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游离右胸内动脉与隐静脉近端吻合左冠状动脉系统血运重建的流量评估
在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中,动脉移植比隐静脉移植(SVGs)具有更好的效果。在动脉移植中,使用双侧胸内动脉移植具有良好的生存效益和移植物通畅性。然而,由于冠状动脉长度不足,原位右胸内动脉移植术(RITA)被用于有限的冠状动脉。相比之下,游离的RITA移植物可用于连续多次移植和移植到远端分支。因此,在多血管旁路移植术中,游离RITA比原位RITA更可行。此外,我们避免了胸骨后原位RITA交叉路径,因为考虑到在再次胸骨切开术或胸骨深部伤口感染时RITA受损的潜在风险。由于这些原因,游离的RITA被用作我们研究所的第二种移植物选择,除了老年患者。当使用游离RITAs时,有几种选择作为近端吻合部位,如主动脉,左胸内动脉移植物(LITA),桡动脉移植物或SVG-。在这些吻合部位中,SVG在技术上是最简单的,我们将一个自由的RITA吻合到SVG的帽上,靠近其主动脉吻合缝合线。在这种技术中,有关于两个接枝之间的流动-偷窃现象的担忧,在与LITA的复合y接枝中。然而,自由的RITA和SVG之间接枝流的相关性还没有得到澄清。我们报告了在我院使用游离RITA进行CABG后的手术结果,以及在主动脉吻合处近端将游离RITA与SVG的头套吻合的流量测量研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Adult Case of Isolated Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Main Pulmonary Artery A Post-closure Technique Using a Single Perclose Device in the Removal of a Transfemoral Impella Catheter Therapeutic Strategies and Future Directions of Management for Patients with a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Who Require Secondary Coronary Revascularization Novel Use of Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty for the Preparation of the Reverse Wire Technique Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry in Iwate Prefecture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1