Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients with Variant Angina

S. Sueda, Tomoki Sakaue
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients with Variant Angina","authors":"S. Sueda, Tomoki Sakaue","doi":"10.7793/jcad.27.21-00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focal Objectives: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and angiographical characteristics between variant angina and non-variant angina. Methods : We diagnosed 902 patients with coronary spastic angina from Jan 1991 to Mar 2019. Variant angina was observed in 105 patients, while the remaining 797 patients had non-variant angina. Acetylcholine was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/100/200 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA) and 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery (RCA), whereas 64 μg ergonovine was administered into the LCA and 40 μg into the RCA. Positive spasm was defined as > 90% stenosis and usual chest pain or ischemic ECG changes. Clinical outcomes under medications were investigated during 1462±960 days of follow-up. Results : There were no differences regarding the clinical characteristics between the two groups. Significant organic stenosis was frequently observed in patients with variant angina compared with non-variant angina. Although the administration of two types of calcium channel blocker (CCB)s, nitrates, and aspirin was markedly higher in patients with variant angina than in those with non-variant angina, the number of clinical outcomes including sudden cardiac death, acute coronary syndrome, ventricular fibrillation, and percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly higher in patients with variant angina than in those with non-variant angina. Clinical outcomes in patients with variant angina and organic stenosis was markedly worse than other 3 groups: variant angina with nonorganic stenosis, non-variant angina with organic stenosis, and non-variant angina and nonorganic stenosis. Conclusions : Clinical outcomes in patients with variant angina was unfavorable compared with those with non-variant angina. Variant angina requires more percutaneous coronary intervention therapy compared with non-variant angina.","PeriodicalId":73692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of coronary artery disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7793/jcad.27.21-00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Focal Objectives: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and angiographical characteristics between variant angina and non-variant angina. Methods : We diagnosed 902 patients with coronary spastic angina from Jan 1991 to Mar 2019. Variant angina was observed in 105 patients, while the remaining 797 patients had non-variant angina. Acetylcholine was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/100/200 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA) and 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery (RCA), whereas 64 μg ergonovine was administered into the LCA and 40 μg into the RCA. Positive spasm was defined as > 90% stenosis and usual chest pain or ischemic ECG changes. Clinical outcomes under medications were investigated during 1462±960 days of follow-up. Results : There were no differences regarding the clinical characteristics between the two groups. Significant organic stenosis was frequently observed in patients with variant angina compared with non-variant angina. Although the administration of two types of calcium channel blocker (CCB)s, nitrates, and aspirin was markedly higher in patients with variant angina than in those with non-variant angina, the number of clinical outcomes including sudden cardiac death, acute coronary syndrome, ventricular fibrillation, and percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly higher in patients with variant angina than in those with non-variant angina. Clinical outcomes in patients with variant angina and organic stenosis was markedly worse than other 3 groups: variant angina with nonorganic stenosis, non-variant angina with organic stenosis, and non-variant angina and nonorganic stenosis. Conclusions : Clinical outcomes in patients with variant angina was unfavorable compared with those with non-variant angina. Variant angina requires more percutaneous coronary intervention therapy compared with non-variant angina.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变异性心绞痛患者的临床特点和预后
重点目的:我们回顾性分析变异性心绞痛和非变异性心绞痛的临床和血管造影特征。方法:1991年1月至2019年3月诊断的902例冠状动脉痉挛性心绞痛患者。变异性心绞痛105例,非变异性心绞痛797例。左冠状动脉注射乙酰胆碱20/50/100/200 μg,右冠状动脉注射乙酰胆碱20/50/80 μg,左冠状动脉注射麦角碱64 μg,右冠状动脉注射麦角碱40 μg。阳性痉挛定义为> - 90%狭窄,常见胸痛或缺血性心电图改变。随访1462±960天,观察药物治疗后的临床结果。结果:两组患者的临床特征无明显差异。变异性心绞痛患者与非变异性心绞痛患者相比,常观察到明显的器质性狭窄。尽管变异性心绞痛患者的两种钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)、硝酸盐和阿司匹林的使用明显高于非变异性心绞痛患者,但变异性心绞痛患者的临床结局包括心源性猝死、急性冠状动脉综合征、心室颤动和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的数量明显高于非变异性心绞痛患者。变异型心绞痛合并器质性狭窄患者的临床结局明显差于变异型心绞痛合并非器质性狭窄、非变异型心绞痛合并器质性狭窄、非变异型心绞痛合并非器质性狭窄3组。结论:变异型心绞痛患者的临床结果较非变异型心绞痛患者不利。变异性心绞痛比非变异性心绞痛需要更多的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Adult Case of Isolated Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery from the Main Pulmonary Artery A Post-closure Technique Using a Single Perclose Device in the Removal of a Transfemoral Impella Catheter Therapeutic Strategies and Future Directions of Management for Patients with a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Who Require Secondary Coronary Revascularization Novel Use of Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty for the Preparation of the Reverse Wire Technique Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry in Iwate Prefecture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1