Anthropology of music: Paradigms and perspectives

Miloš Rašić
{"title":"Anthropology of music: Paradigms and perspectives","authors":"Miloš Rašić","doi":"10.5937/ZBAKUM1604133R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Music represents a relational category, in the sense that people write meaning into it, and later by the means of the same music they write the meaning into other people. Therefore, I regard music as a cultural construct. Music does not possess universal meanings, but it forms its numerous meanings in different cultural environments, as well as in different individual perceptions. In anthropology, music is not studied in relation to its musical characteristics or aesthetical values. Anthropologists study its role in a wider social system, and strive to understand, by analysing the role of music in a society, the social and cultural system it belongs to - musical structure is less important here. The goal of the paper is to give an overview of the paradigms in ethnology and anthropology which have been used in studying music. In addition, a hypothetical-theoretical framework for studying music in institutions is set. Although the theory of hubs, which is presented here as a potential framework for studying music in institutions, is exemplified by traditional music, it can be applied to any genre of music. The basic theoretical framework offered by the authors Nadia Kiwan and Hanna Mainhof has been supplemented by certain parts which the author thought appropriate for studying music in institutions, both in ethnological and anthropological discourse.","PeriodicalId":31481,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","volume":"1 1","pages":"133-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ZBAKUM1604133R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Music represents a relational category, in the sense that people write meaning into it, and later by the means of the same music they write the meaning into other people. Therefore, I regard music as a cultural construct. Music does not possess universal meanings, but it forms its numerous meanings in different cultural environments, as well as in different individual perceptions. In anthropology, music is not studied in relation to its musical characteristics or aesthetical values. Anthropologists study its role in a wider social system, and strive to understand, by analysing the role of music in a society, the social and cultural system it belongs to - musical structure is less important here. The goal of the paper is to give an overview of the paradigms in ethnology and anthropology which have been used in studying music. In addition, a hypothetical-theoretical framework for studying music in institutions is set. Although the theory of hubs, which is presented here as a potential framework for studying music in institutions, is exemplified by traditional music, it can be applied to any genre of music. The basic theoretical framework offered by the authors Nadia Kiwan and Hanna Mainhof has been supplemented by certain parts which the author thought appropriate for studying music in institutions, both in ethnological and anthropological discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐人类学:范式与视角
音乐代表了一种关系范畴,也就是说,人们把意义写进音乐中,然后通过同样的音乐,他们把意义写进其他人身上。因此,我认为音乐是一种文化建构。音乐并不具有普遍意义,但它在不同的文化环境中,以及在不同的个体感知中形成了它的众多意义。在人类学中,音乐不是根据其音乐特征或美学价值来研究的。人类学家研究音乐在更广泛的社会系统中的作用,并努力通过分析音乐在社会中的作用来理解它所属的社会和文化系统——音乐结构在这里不太重要。本文的目的是概述民族学和人类学范式在音乐研究中的应用。此外,本文还为高校音乐学习设定了一个假设理论框架。虽然枢纽理论,在这里是作为一个潜在的框架,在机构中研究音乐,以传统音乐为例,它可以应用于任何类型的音乐。作者Nadia Kiwan和Hanna Mainhof提供的基本理论框架被作者认为适合在人类学和民族学话语中研究音乐的某些部分所补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
An artistic interpretation of the first museum non-object Meisterstreich: The formation of the concept of genius and the end of normative aesthetics The concept of life in Soviet art history and paintings of the 1920s The symbolic connotations of shoes in Nika Autor's films Switching places: Theater projects of Olja Lozica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1