Cognitive dissonance as a measure of reactions to human-robot interaction

D. Levin, C. Harriott, Natalie Paul, Tao Zhang, J. Adams
{"title":"Cognitive dissonance as a measure of reactions to human-robot interaction","authors":"D. Levin, C. Harriott, Natalie Paul, Tao Zhang, J. Adams","doi":"10.5898/jhri.2.3.levin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When people interact with intelligent agents, they likely rely upon a wide range of existing knowledge about machines, minds, and intelligence. This knowledge not only guides these interactions, but it can be challenged and potentially changed by interaction experiences. We hypothesized that a key factor mediating conceptual change in response to human-machine interactions is cognitive conflict, or dissonance. In this experiment, we evaluated whether interactions with a robot partner during a realistic medical triage scenario caused increased levels of cognitive dissonance relative to a control condition in which the same task was performed with a human partner. In addition, we evaluated whether heightened levels of dissonance affected concepts about agents. We observed increased cognitive dissonance after the human-robot interaction and found that this dissonance was correlated with a significantly less intentional (e.g., less human-like) view of the intelligence inherent to computers.","PeriodicalId":92076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of human-robot interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5898/jhri.2.3.levin","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of human-robot interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5898/jhri.2.3.levin","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

When people interact with intelligent agents, they likely rely upon a wide range of existing knowledge about machines, minds, and intelligence. This knowledge not only guides these interactions, but it can be challenged and potentially changed by interaction experiences. We hypothesized that a key factor mediating conceptual change in response to human-machine interactions is cognitive conflict, or dissonance. In this experiment, we evaluated whether interactions with a robot partner during a realistic medical triage scenario caused increased levels of cognitive dissonance relative to a control condition in which the same task was performed with a human partner. In addition, we evaluated whether heightened levels of dissonance affected concepts about agents. We observed increased cognitive dissonance after the human-robot interaction and found that this dissonance was correlated with a significantly less intentional (e.g., less human-like) view of the intelligence inherent to computers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知失调作为对人机交互反应的衡量标准
当人们与智能代理交互时,他们可能依赖于关于机器、思想和智能的广泛现有知识。这些知识不仅可以指导这些交互,而且可以通过交互经验来挑战和潜在地改变。我们假设,一个关键因素调解的概念变化,以响应人机交互是认知冲突,或不协调。在本实验中,我们评估了在现实医疗分诊场景中与机器人伴侣的互动是否会导致认知失调水平增加,而在控制条件下,与人类伴侣执行相同的任务。此外,我们评估了高度的不协调是否会影响有关代理的概念。我们观察到人机交互后认知失调的增加,并发现这种失调与计算机固有智能的明显不那么有意识(例如,不那么像人类)的观点相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are You Reviewer 2: Three Ideas for Better Reviewing Understanding agency in interactions between children with autism and socially assistive robots Touching a mechanical body How should a robot approach two people? Supporting situation awareness through robot-to-human information exchanges under conditions of visuospatial perspective taking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1