A Lower Cyst Fluid CEA Cut-Off Increases Diagnostic Accuracy In Identifying Mucinous Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

IF 0.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of the Pancreas Pub Date : 2015-05-20 DOI:10.6092/1590-8577/2994
D. Jin, A. Small, C. Vollmer, N. Jhala, E. Furth, G. Ginsberg, M. Kochman, N. Ahmad, V. Chandrasekhara
{"title":"A Lower Cyst Fluid CEA Cut-Off Increases Diagnostic Accuracy In Identifying Mucinous Pancreatic Cystic Lesions","authors":"D. Jin, A. Small, C. Vollmer, N. Jhala, E. Furth, G. Ginsberg, M. Kochman, N. Ahmad, V. Chandrasekhara","doi":"10.6092/1590-8577/2994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Carcinoembryonic antigen analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid is the tumor marker of choice for preoperatively differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cystic lesions. Objective We aim to determine the most accurate cyst carcinoembryonic antigen cut-off value for distinguishing mucinous cysts from non-mucinous cysts with a focus on discriminating intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Methods The results of pancreatic cyst aspiration carcinoembryonic antigen levels from a single center were retrospectively collected and evaluated for a diagnosis of a mucinous cyst and an assessment of malignancy using surgical histology as the diagnostic standard in 86 patients. Results The median cyst carcinoembryonic antigen level (ng/mL) was significantly higher in mucinous cysts compared with non-mucinous cysts (218 vs. 4.4; P=0.0006) and in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms compared with non-mucinous cysts (135 vs. 4.4; P=0.0027). A cyst carcinoembryonic antigen cut-off of 30.7 ng/mL was most accurate (87.2%) for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts and specifically for differentiating intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms from non-mucinous cysts (82.7%). Cyst carcinoembryonic antigen levels were not significantly different between malignant and non-malignant mucinous cysts (68.5 vs. 238.1; P=0.51). Conclusions Pancreatic cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen can accurately differentiate histologically verified mucinous lesions, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, from non-mucinous lesions with an optimal cut-off that is much lower than previously reported values. Cyst carcinoembryonic antigen levels are not a reliable predictor of malignancy. Image: Sensitivity and specificity curves of cyst fluid CEA levels for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts.","PeriodicalId":47280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pancreas","volume":"16 1","pages":"271-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/2994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Context Carcinoembryonic antigen analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid is the tumor marker of choice for preoperatively differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cystic lesions. Objective We aim to determine the most accurate cyst carcinoembryonic antigen cut-off value for distinguishing mucinous cysts from non-mucinous cysts with a focus on discriminating intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Methods The results of pancreatic cyst aspiration carcinoembryonic antigen levels from a single center were retrospectively collected and evaluated for a diagnosis of a mucinous cyst and an assessment of malignancy using surgical histology as the diagnostic standard in 86 patients. Results The median cyst carcinoembryonic antigen level (ng/mL) was significantly higher in mucinous cysts compared with non-mucinous cysts (218 vs. 4.4; P=0.0006) and in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms compared with non-mucinous cysts (135 vs. 4.4; P=0.0027). A cyst carcinoembryonic antigen cut-off of 30.7 ng/mL was most accurate (87.2%) for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts and specifically for differentiating intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms from non-mucinous cysts (82.7%). Cyst carcinoembryonic antigen levels were not significantly different between malignant and non-malignant mucinous cysts (68.5 vs. 238.1; P=0.51). Conclusions Pancreatic cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen can accurately differentiate histologically verified mucinous lesions, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, from non-mucinous lesions with an optimal cut-off that is much lower than previously reported values. Cyst carcinoembryonic antigen levels are not a reliable predictor of malignancy. Image: Sensitivity and specificity curves of cyst fluid CEA levels for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
较低的囊肿液CEA切点可提高胰腺粘液性囊性病变的诊断准确性
背景:胰腺囊肿液癌胚抗原分析是术前鉴别粘液性和非粘液性囊性病变的肿瘤标志物。目的探讨鉴别导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的最准确的囊肿癌胚抗原切断值。方法回顾性收集86例胰腺囊肿单中心抽吸癌胚抗原检测结果,并以手术组织学为诊断标准,评价其对粘液囊肿的诊断和恶性程度的判断。结果黏液囊肿中囊癌胚抗原水平(ng/mL)明显高于非黏液囊肿(218∶4.4;P=0.0006),导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤与非黏液性囊肿相比(135 vs 4.4;P = 0.0027)。囊肿癌胚抗原切断值为30.7 ng/mL,区分黏液性囊肿和非黏液性囊肿最准确(87.2%),特别是区分导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤和非黏液性囊肿(82.7%)。恶性和非恶性黏液囊肿癌胚抗原水平无显著差异(68.5比238.1;P = 0.51)。结论胰腺囊肿液癌胚抗原可以准确区分组织学证实的粘液性病变,包括导管内乳头状粘液性肿瘤和非粘液性病变,其最佳临界值远低于先前报道的值。囊肿癌胚抗原水平不是恶性肿瘤的可靠预测指标。图像:囊肿液CEA水平鉴别黏液囊肿与非黏液囊肿的敏感性和特异性曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Pancreas
Journal of the Pancreas GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bridging the Gap in Pancreatic Imaging: A New Era of AI-Powered Precision. Survival Benefits and Disparities in Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Why do we need to be focused on pancreatic cancer Pediatric Pancreatic Lymphadenitis Tuberculosis Causing IVC Thrombosis in Syria: A Case Report Tumor-related paraneoplastic disorder creating a bogus synapse?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1