Exploration and firms’ innovative performance – How does this relationship work?

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios Pub Date : 2016-08-30 DOI:10.7819/RBGN.V18I61.2635
Frederico G. P. Moreira, Ana Lúcia Vitale Torkomian, Thiago J. C. C. Soares
{"title":"Exploration and firms’ innovative performance – How does this relationship work?","authors":"Frederico G. P. Moreira, Ana Lúcia Vitale Torkomian, Thiago J. C. C. Soares","doi":"10.7819/RBGN.V18I61.2635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The main purpose of this paper is to analyze (1) the relationship between a firm’s exploration strategy and its innovative performance, and (2) whether its absorptive capacity (AC) moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach – We adopted an econometric approach, using secondary data. We synchronized two databases – Compustat and USPTO –, from which we extracted common data concerning 275 biopharmaceutical firms for the period between 1990 and 2003. We used negative binomial regression to analyze data. Findings – The exploration strategy positively influences firms’ innovative performance. However, excessive emphasis on this strategy can diminish its benefits. Moreover, a firm’s AC will not positively moderate the curvilinear relationship between exploration and the firm’s innovative performance in all contexts, contradicting our theoretical predictions. This is due to the existence of trade-offs between AC characteristics and other organizational factors. Originality/value – This paper extends the understanding of Open Innovation and AC theories. Our results suggest that AC cannot be understood as a one-dimensional and autonomous capacity located exclusively in R&D departments. Aspects such as financial power, the business model and the different dimensions of AC and their respective locations in the firm’s value chain should be considered whenever the influence of AC on exploration strategies is analyzed.","PeriodicalId":45001,"journal":{"name":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","volume":"18 1","pages":"392-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7819/RBGN.V18I61.2635","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7819/RBGN.V18I61.2635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose – The main purpose of this paper is to analyze (1) the relationship between a firm’s exploration strategy and its innovative performance, and (2) whether its absorptive capacity (AC) moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach – We adopted an econometric approach, using secondary data. We synchronized two databases – Compustat and USPTO –, from which we extracted common data concerning 275 biopharmaceutical firms for the period between 1990 and 2003. We used negative binomial regression to analyze data. Findings – The exploration strategy positively influences firms’ innovative performance. However, excessive emphasis on this strategy can diminish its benefits. Moreover, a firm’s AC will not positively moderate the curvilinear relationship between exploration and the firm’s innovative performance in all contexts, contradicting our theoretical predictions. This is due to the existence of trade-offs between AC characteristics and other organizational factors. Originality/value – This paper extends the understanding of Open Innovation and AC theories. Our results suggest that AC cannot be understood as a one-dimensional and autonomous capacity located exclusively in R&D departments. Aspects such as financial power, the business model and the different dimensions of AC and their respective locations in the firm’s value chain should be considered whenever the influence of AC on exploration strategies is analyzed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索与企业创新绩效——这种关系是如何起作用的?
目的-本文的主要目的是分析(1)企业的探索战略与其创新绩效之间的关系,以及(2)企业的吸收能力(AC)是否调节了这种关系。设计/方法/方法-我们采用计量经济学方法,使用二手数据。我们同步了Compustat和USPTO两个数据库,从中提取了1990年至2003年期间275家生物制药公司的共同数据。我们使用负二项回归分析数据。研究发现-探索策略对企业创新绩效有正向影响。然而,过分强调这一策略会减少其好处。此外,在所有情况下,企业的AC都不会正向调节探索与企业创新绩效之间的曲线关系,这与我们的理论预测相矛盾。这是由于交流特性和其他组织因素之间存在权衡。原创性/价值——本文扩展了对开放式创新和AC理论的理解。我们的研究结果表明,交流能力不能被理解为只存在于研发部门的一种一维的自主能力。在分析AC对勘探策略的影响时,应考虑财务实力、商业模式、AC的不同维度及其在公司价值链中的各自位置等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
16
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perception of organizational justice and home office work performance: influence of affective commitment Testing the contributions of outside directors: should family firms respond differently? Exploring hidden topics on hotel Facebook fan pages before and during the COVID-19 crisis Micro-entrepreneurs in the creative industry: how resilience overcomes the impacts of the pandemic Antecedents and consequences of brand tribes in sports organizations:the role of brand personality dimensions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1