Analysis of the effects of conservatism in accounting information after the 2011 change in the basic conceptual pronouncement

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios Pub Date : 2017-07-26 DOI:10.7819/RBGN.V19I65.2742
Clóvis Antônio Kronbauer, Luiz Henrique Figueira Marquezan, Marco Aurélio Barbosa, Carlos Alberto Diehl
{"title":"Analysis of the effects of conservatism in accounting information after the 2011 change in the basic conceptual pronouncement","authors":"Clóvis Antônio Kronbauer, Luiz Henrique Figueira Marquezan, Marco Aurélio Barbosa, Carlos Alberto Diehl","doi":"10.7819/RBGN.V19I65.2742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This study researches whether the change in NBC TG, promoted in 2011, that excluded Prudence (Conservatism), had any effect on companies’ accounting information. Design/methodology/approach – Quantitative approach, using a linear regression based on the Basu (1997) method, Wilcoxon tests and t test, on a sample with 109 companies, listed on the BM&FBovespa, from 2008 to 2013. Findings – The results indicate that conservatism is present in accounting for the entire period, and changes do not occur in this feature of the accounting information as of 2011. Originality/value – This research reinforces the perception of the superiority of economic interest, in particular for possible tax gains, to the detriment of accounting information quality, be it of regulatory origin or another.","PeriodicalId":45001,"journal":{"name":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7819/RBGN.V19I65.2742","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7819/RBGN.V19I65.2742","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose – This study researches whether the change in NBC TG, promoted in 2011, that excluded Prudence (Conservatism), had any effect on companies’ accounting information. Design/methodology/approach – Quantitative approach, using a linear regression based on the Basu (1997) method, Wilcoxon tests and t test, on a sample with 109 companies, listed on the BM&FBovespa, from 2008 to 2013. Findings – The results indicate that conservatism is present in accounting for the entire period, and changes do not occur in this feature of the accounting information as of 2011. Originality/value – This research reinforces the perception of the superiority of economic interest, in particular for possible tax gains, to the detriment of accounting information quality, be it of regulatory origin or another.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析2011年后会计信息稳健性对基本概念公告的影响
目的-本研究研究2011年推出的NBC TG变化是否对公司会计信息产生影响,该变化排除了审慎性(稳健性)。设计/方法/方法-定量方法,使用基于Basu(1997)方法的线性回归,Wilcoxon检验和t检验,样本为2008年至2013年在BM&FBovespa上市的109家公司。发现-结果表明,稳健性在整个期间的会计中都存在,并且截至2011年,会计信息的这一特征没有发生变化。原创性/价值-本研究强化了经济利益(特别是可能的税收收益)的优越性的看法,从而损害了会计信息质量,无论是出于监管还是其他原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
16
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perception of organizational justice and home office work performance: influence of affective commitment Testing the contributions of outside directors: should family firms respond differently? Exploring hidden topics on hotel Facebook fan pages before and during the COVID-19 crisis Micro-entrepreneurs in the creative industry: how resilience overcomes the impacts of the pandemic Antecedents and consequences of brand tribes in sports organizations:the role of brand personality dimensions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1