The Reception of Spinoza and Mendelssohn in the Russian Enlightenment and the Russian-Jewish Haskalah

Q4 Arts and Humanities Dialogue and Universalism Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5840/du20223216
Igor Kaufman
{"title":"The Reception of Spinoza and Mendelssohn in the Russian Enlightenment and the Russian-Jewish Haskalah","authors":"Igor Kaufman","doi":"10.5840/du20223216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My general objective in this paper is to provide (1) the outlines of the reception of Baruch Spinoza and Moses Mendelssohn in the Russian Enlightenment of the late 18th century as well as (2) in the Russian-Jewish Haskalah. In part (1) of the paper I consider Gavrila (Gavriil) Derzhavin’s mention of Mendelssohn in his “Opinion,” the translation of Mendelssohn’s Phaedon in Nikolay Novikov’s Masonic-inspired journal Utrennyi Svet, and the readings of Spinoza’s view on God and then-shared interpretation of his views as an “atheism” in Feofan Propovich, Vasily Trediakovskiy, and Alexander Sumarokov. In the part on the late Russian-Jewish Haskalah of 1860s I examine two intellectual biographies appeared in the period—Saveliy (Saul) Kovner on Spinoza and Yakov Gurliand on Mendelssohn, which aim to interpret positions of Spinoza and Mendelssohn as exemplary strategies of the Jewish emancipation within the framework of claims and prospects of the modern European culture. I also rediscover and reinterpret Spinoza’s approach to religion as the late Russian Haskalah’s authors strongly object to label Spinoza’s philosophy of religion as “atheistic” and consider it as close to the “pure, or true Judaism.”","PeriodicalId":36732,"journal":{"name":"Dialogue and Universalism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogue and Universalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/du20223216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

My general objective in this paper is to provide (1) the outlines of the reception of Baruch Spinoza and Moses Mendelssohn in the Russian Enlightenment of the late 18th century as well as (2) in the Russian-Jewish Haskalah. In part (1) of the paper I consider Gavrila (Gavriil) Derzhavin’s mention of Mendelssohn in his “Opinion,” the translation of Mendelssohn’s Phaedon in Nikolay Novikov’s Masonic-inspired journal Utrennyi Svet, and the readings of Spinoza’s view on God and then-shared interpretation of his views as an “atheism” in Feofan Propovich, Vasily Trediakovskiy, and Alexander Sumarokov. In the part on the late Russian-Jewish Haskalah of 1860s I examine two intellectual biographies appeared in the period—Saveliy (Saul) Kovner on Spinoza and Yakov Gurliand on Mendelssohn, which aim to interpret positions of Spinoza and Mendelssohn as exemplary strategies of the Jewish emancipation within the framework of claims and prospects of the modern European culture. I also rediscover and reinterpret Spinoza’s approach to religion as the late Russian Haskalah’s authors strongly object to label Spinoza’s philosophy of religion as “atheistic” and consider it as close to the “pure, or true Judaism.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄国启蒙运动对斯宾诺莎和门德尔松的接受与俄国犹太人的哈斯卡拉
我在本文中的总体目标是提供(1)在18世纪晚期的俄罗斯启蒙运动中对巴鲁克·斯宾诺莎和摩西·门德尔松的接受概况,以及(2)在俄罗斯犹太人的哈斯卡拉。在论文的第一部分中,我考虑了加夫里拉·德尔扎文在他的《观点》中提到门德尔松,在尼古拉·诺维科夫的共济会期刊《乌特伦尼·斯维特》中翻译门德尔松的《费奥凡·普罗波维奇》中的《费奥凡·特雷迪亚科夫斯基》和亚历山大·苏马洛科夫对斯宾诺莎的上帝观的解读,以及当时对他的观点的“无神论”的共同解释。在19世纪60年代晚期的俄裔犹太人Haskalah部分,我考察了这一时期出现的两部知识分子传记——萨维里(索尔)科夫纳论斯宾诺莎和雅科夫·古利兰论门德尔松,它们旨在将斯宾诺莎和门德尔松的立场解释为在现代欧洲文化的要求和前景框架内犹太人解放的典范策略。我也重新发现并重新解释了斯宾诺莎对宗教的态度,因为已故的俄罗斯哈斯卡拉的作者强烈反对将斯宾诺莎的宗教哲学贴上“无神论”的标签,并认为它接近于“纯粹或真正的犹太教”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogue and Universalism
Dialogue and Universalism Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Problems of the Unknowability and Total Unity in the Light of Philosophy of Semyon L. Frank Re-Thinking Cultural Hedonism Do We Really Need a New Enlightenment for the 21st Century? On the Question of Whether We Need a New Enlightenment for the 21st Century How Do We Shape a Reform of the 21st-Century Human World in an Enlightenment Spirit? On Projects by Robert E. Allinson and Michael H. Mitias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1