A Cohort Study on Survival Predictors of Low Birth Weight Newborns

Ningshen Themyaola, R. Navale, A. L. Bairwa
{"title":"A Cohort Study on Survival Predictors of Low Birth Weight Newborns","authors":"Ningshen Themyaola, R. Navale, A. L. Bairwa","doi":"10.7860/ijnmr/2021/49152.2304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Low Birth Weight (LBW) represent a vulnerable group of newborns associated with high risk of complications thus have a high mortality rate. There are many factors affecting the early survival of LBW neonates. There are limited studies providing the evidence on survival predictors in the newborns in western Indian region. Aim: To identify the various factors determining the survival of LBW newborns. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Department of Paediatrics, Jay Kay Lon Mother and Child Hospital, a neonatal and paediatric tertiary care centre attached to Government Medical College, Kota, India over a period from January 2011 to December 2011. Three hundred and sixty two newborns, admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with birth weight <2500 gm within 24 hours of birth, were included in the study. Data were interpreted by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Software for windows version 20.0. Those babies that were transferred and directly discharged to home were pooled as survivors and for the purpose of analysis were compared to babies that died during hospital stay. Associations between categorical variables and survival and death outcome were performed using the Chi-Square test. The p-value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant. Results: This study of total sample of 362 newborns, reported a survival rate of 76.52% (277) and a mortality of 23.48% (85). Single gestation birth had better survival (78.69%) than multiple births (64.91%) (p=0.024). The survival improved as the birth weight increased (p<0.001). The survival in female was better (82.31%) as compared to males (72.56%) (p=0.032). The survival in Appropriate for Gestational Age (AGA) newborns was better (79.85%) than Small for Gestational Age (SGA) (67.68%) (p=0.0149). Neonates delivered to mothers who received antenatal steroids had a survival rate of 76.14% as compared to 68.13% in those who had not received steroids (p<0.02). Main cause of mortality in the study group was Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) (86.36%) followed by Birth Asphyxia (BA) (33.33%) and Necrotising Enterocolitis (NEC) (33.33%). Conclusion: The BA and RDS were the most common cause of neonatal mortality among various other complications related to prematurity and LBW. However, there are several factors that interplay and it is not possible to single out any particular factor influencing LBW survival. Reducing perinatal mortality requires a multidimensional approach with timely identification and appropriate management of the issues related to potential complications of prematurity as RDS, LBW and BA.","PeriodicalId":31116,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijnmr/2021/49152.2304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Low Birth Weight (LBW) represent a vulnerable group of newborns associated with high risk of complications thus have a high mortality rate. There are many factors affecting the early survival of LBW neonates. There are limited studies providing the evidence on survival predictors in the newborns in western Indian region. Aim: To identify the various factors determining the survival of LBW newborns. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Department of Paediatrics, Jay Kay Lon Mother and Child Hospital, a neonatal and paediatric tertiary care centre attached to Government Medical College, Kota, India over a period from January 2011 to December 2011. Three hundred and sixty two newborns, admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with birth weight <2500 gm within 24 hours of birth, were included in the study. Data were interpreted by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Software for windows version 20.0. Those babies that were transferred and directly discharged to home were pooled as survivors and for the purpose of analysis were compared to babies that died during hospital stay. Associations between categorical variables and survival and death outcome were performed using the Chi-Square test. The p-value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant. Results: This study of total sample of 362 newborns, reported a survival rate of 76.52% (277) and a mortality of 23.48% (85). Single gestation birth had better survival (78.69%) than multiple births (64.91%) (p=0.024). The survival improved as the birth weight increased (p<0.001). The survival in female was better (82.31%) as compared to males (72.56%) (p=0.032). The survival in Appropriate for Gestational Age (AGA) newborns was better (79.85%) than Small for Gestational Age (SGA) (67.68%) (p=0.0149). Neonates delivered to mothers who received antenatal steroids had a survival rate of 76.14% as compared to 68.13% in those who had not received steroids (p<0.02). Main cause of mortality in the study group was Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) (86.36%) followed by Birth Asphyxia (BA) (33.33%) and Necrotising Enterocolitis (NEC) (33.33%). Conclusion: The BA and RDS were the most common cause of neonatal mortality among various other complications related to prematurity and LBW. However, there are several factors that interplay and it is not possible to single out any particular factor influencing LBW survival. Reducing perinatal mortality requires a multidimensional approach with timely identification and appropriate management of the issues related to potential complications of prematurity as RDS, LBW and BA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低出生体重新生儿生存预测因素的队列研究
低出生体重(LBW)是新生儿的一个脆弱群体,与并发症的高风险相关,因此具有高死亡率。影响LBW新生儿早期生存的因素很多。有有限的研究提供证据的生存预测在西印度地区的新生儿。目的:探讨影响LBW新生儿生存的各种因素。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,于2011年1月至2011年12月期间在印度哥打政府医学院附属的新生儿和儿科三级护理中心Jay Kay Lon母婴医院儿科新生儿重症监护室(NICU)进行。本研究纳入了出生24小时内出生体重<2500克的新生儿重症监护病房的312名新生儿。采用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences)软件for windows version 20.0对数据进行解释。那些被转移并直接出院回家的婴儿被汇总为幸存者,并与住院期间死亡的婴儿进行比较分析。分类变量与生存和死亡结果之间的相关性采用卡方检验。p值小于或等于0.05被认为是显著的。结果:本研究共收集新生儿362例,报告生存率为76.52%(277例),死亡率为23.48%(85例)。单胎生存率(78.69%)高于多胎生存率(64.91%)(p=0.024)。存活率随出生体重的增加而提高(p<0.001)。女性生存率为82.31%,高于男性生存率(72.56%)(p=0.032)。适胎龄组(AGA)新生儿的生存率(79.85%)优于小胎龄组(SGA) (67.68%) (p=0.0149)。产前接受类固醇治疗的母亲所生新生儿的存活率为76.14%,而未接受类固醇治疗的母亲所生新生儿的存活率为68.13% (p<0.02)。研究组死亡原因以呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)为主(86.36%),其次为出生窒息(BA)(33.33%)和坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)(33.33%)。结论:BA和RDS是早产和LBW相关并发症中最常见的新生儿死亡原因。然而,有几个因素相互作用,不可能挑出任何影响LBW生存的特定因素。降低围产期死亡率需要采取多维方法,及时识别和适当管理与RDS、LBW和BA等早产儿潜在并发症相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transcranial Ultrasonography Doppler in Detecting Clinical Outcome of Term Neonates with Perinatal Asphyxia: A Longitudinal Study Effect of Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy on Coagulation Profile in Neonates in a Tertiary Care Center, Agra- A Prospective Clinical Study Mid Upper Arm Circumference as the Best Surrogate Marker for Identification of Low Birth Weight in Newborns within the First 24 Hours of Life- A Cross-sectional Study A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study of Paediatric Dermatoses during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Clinico-epidemiological Characteristics and Short-term Outcomes of Neonates Born to COVID-19 Positive Mothers at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North Karnataka- A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1