Article: Pillar Two and African Countries: What Should Their Response Be? The Case for a Regional One

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW Intertax Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2022069
Afton Titus
{"title":"Article: Pillar Two and African Countries: What Should Their Response Be? The Case for a Regional One","authors":"Afton Titus","doi":"10.54648/taxi2022069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the OECD’s efforts to implement Pillar Two become more concrete, it becomes more important to understand the implications of this instrument for African developing countries. This article considers the possible responses available to a grouping of African countries in a bid to ensure that their corporate income tax policies are not undermined. In doing so, this article analyses the feasibility of these countries imposing a domestic minimum tax, adapting their tax incentives to non-tax incentives and whether African countries should support the proposal for a United Nations international tax forum. This article argues that it may be feasible for African countries to introduce a targeted domestic minimum tax that would apply to in-scope multinational enterprises (MNEs). Moreover, it may be possible for African countries to adapt their tax incentives to non-tax subsidies although this would involve some costs. It is heartening to see the proposal for a United Nations international tax forum, and it may be in the best interest of African countries to support such an initiative. Pillar Two has far-reaching implications for developing countries and it is important that African countries consider adopting regional responses to it. This article endeavours to create the space for such discussions.\nPillar Two, developing countries, Africa, domestic minimum taxes, non-tax subsidies, United Nations, corporate income tax","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the OECD’s efforts to implement Pillar Two become more concrete, it becomes more important to understand the implications of this instrument for African developing countries. This article considers the possible responses available to a grouping of African countries in a bid to ensure that their corporate income tax policies are not undermined. In doing so, this article analyses the feasibility of these countries imposing a domestic minimum tax, adapting their tax incentives to non-tax incentives and whether African countries should support the proposal for a United Nations international tax forum. This article argues that it may be feasible for African countries to introduce a targeted domestic minimum tax that would apply to in-scope multinational enterprises (MNEs). Moreover, it may be possible for African countries to adapt their tax incentives to non-tax subsidies although this would involve some costs. It is heartening to see the proposal for a United Nations international tax forum, and it may be in the best interest of African countries to support such an initiative. Pillar Two has far-reaching implications for developing countries and it is important that African countries consider adopting regional responses to it. This article endeavours to create the space for such discussions. Pillar Two, developing countries, Africa, domestic minimum taxes, non-tax subsidies, United Nations, corporate income tax
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文章:第二支柱与非洲国家:它们应该如何应对?区域性银行的案例
随着经合发组织执行第二支柱的努力变得更加具体,了解这一文书对非洲发展中国家的影响就变得更加重要。本文考虑了一组非洲国家可能采取的应对措施,以确保它们的企业所得税政策不受破坏。在此过程中,本文分析了这些国家征收国内最低税的可行性,使其税收激励措施适应非税收激励措施,以及非洲国家是否应支持关于联合国国际税收论坛的建议。本文认为,非洲国家引入适用于范围内跨国企业(MNEs)的有针对性的国内最低税可能是可行的。此外,非洲国家也许可以将其税收奖励调整为非税收补贴,尽管这将涉及一些费用。看到关于联合国国际税务论坛的建议令人鼓舞,支持这一倡议可能符合非洲国家的最佳利益。第二支柱对发展中国家具有深远的影响,非洲国家必须考虑对此作出区域反应。本文试图为这样的讨论创造空间。第二支柱,发展中国家,非洲,国内最低税,非税补贴,联合国,企业所得税
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
(In)congruence Between Taxation, Spending, and Representation: The Ambiguous Character of Tax-based Contributions Taxing Powers of the European Union Judicial Review of the EU Own Resources Decision by the ECJ Protecting EU Financial Interests in the Collection of Tax-Based Own Resources Article: Conflicts between Directives that Require Taxation of Income and Tax Treaties: The Effectiveness of the EU Primacy-based Conflict Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1