[Nursing handover: an observational study at the inpatient wards - cardiothoracic department].

Q3 Medicine Professioni infermieristiche Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.7429/pi.2021.744230
Maria Filomena Speltri, Marco Vaselli, S. Baratta, Maila Lazzarini, M. Baroni, A. Ripoli, T. Bellandi
{"title":"[Nursing handover: an observational study at the inpatient wards - cardiothoracic department].","authors":"Maria Filomena Speltri, Marco Vaselli, S. Baratta, Maila Lazzarini, M. Baroni, A. Ripoli, T. Bellandi","doi":"10.7429/pi.2021.744230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION The handover has relevant implications in terms of patient safety. An effective handover requires the use of a standardized and shared communication tool. AIM This observational study explored the nursing handover at shift change in order to detect eventual omissions. Furthermore, it investigated the quality perceived by the nurses involved. METHOD At each shift change, an external observer detected the referred and omitted information by the delivering nurse, through the use of a direct observational grid (modified ISBAR). The percentage of the omitted information was calculated excluding any unforeseen information, not linked to the patient care pathway and detected through the consultation of the nursing record. The quality perceived by the nurses involved was investigated through the use of the Handoff CEX tool. The data was processed through a descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. RESULTS 256 handovers were observed and 256 nursing records were reviewed. The omissions were detected in 43.17% of the cases. The results highlight a propensity for a prospective approach. A high statistical significance emerges in relation to the modality of handover, the type of patient, the nurse/patients ratio and the number of interruptions. Referring to the perceived quality, 40 Handoff CEX evaluation forms were completed. The results show a more than satisfactory perception. However, the thematic analysis highlights scarcely detailed and dispersive handovers as well as the difficulty to focus on the information to deliver. CONCLUSION According to the findings of this research, it is necessary to implement a standardized tool which supports the handover process.","PeriodicalId":34911,"journal":{"name":"Professioni infermieristiche","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professioni infermieristiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2021.744230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The handover has relevant implications in terms of patient safety. An effective handover requires the use of a standardized and shared communication tool. AIM This observational study explored the nursing handover at shift change in order to detect eventual omissions. Furthermore, it investigated the quality perceived by the nurses involved. METHOD At each shift change, an external observer detected the referred and omitted information by the delivering nurse, through the use of a direct observational grid (modified ISBAR). The percentage of the omitted information was calculated excluding any unforeseen information, not linked to the patient care pathway and detected through the consultation of the nursing record. The quality perceived by the nurses involved was investigated through the use of the Handoff CEX tool. The data was processed through a descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. RESULTS 256 handovers were observed and 256 nursing records were reviewed. The omissions were detected in 43.17% of the cases. The results highlight a propensity for a prospective approach. A high statistical significance emerges in relation to the modality of handover, the type of patient, the nurse/patients ratio and the number of interruptions. Referring to the perceived quality, 40 Handoff CEX evaluation forms were completed. The results show a more than satisfactory perception. However, the thematic analysis highlights scarcely detailed and dispersive handovers as well as the difficulty to focus on the information to deliver. CONCLUSION According to the findings of this research, it is necessary to implement a standardized tool which supports the handover process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[护理交接:住院病房的观察性研究-心胸科]。
交接在患者安全方面具有相关意义。有效的交接需要使用标准化和共享的沟通工具。目的本观察性研究探讨轮班时的护理交接,以发现最终的疏漏。此外,还调查了参与调查的护士对护理质量的感知。方法每次换班时,由一名外部观察员通过直接观察网格(改进的ISBAR)检测接生护士的转诊和遗漏信息。遗漏信息的百分比计算排除了任何不可预见的信息,与患者护理途径无关,并通过咨询护理记录检测到。通过使用Handoff CEX工具调查参与的护士感知的质量。数据通过描述性和推断性统计分析进行处理。结果共观察患者交接班256例,回顾护理记录256例。漏检率为43.17%。结果突出了前瞻性方法的倾向。交接方式、患者类型、护士/患者比例、中断次数均有较高的统计学意义。参照感知质量,完成40份Handoff CEX评价表格。结果显示了一个非常令人满意的感觉。然而,专题分析强调了几乎不详细和分散的移交,以及难以专注于传递的信息。结论根据本研究的发现,有必要实施一个支持移交过程的标准化工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Professioni infermieristiche
Professioni infermieristiche Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Professioni Infermieristiche pubblica, previa approvazione del Comitato di Redazione (CdR), articoli relativi alle diverse funzioni ed ambiti della professione infermieristica e ostetrica.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life, Stress, and Burnout of Italian nurses during the outbreak of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study Cinism, differentiated federal autonomy and sustainability of health services. Nursing competence in continuous renal replacement therapy: development and validation of a measurement tool. Mapping the literature on Digital and Technological Solutions in nursing: a scoping review protocol. [Relation between sleep deprivation and nursing errors during the night shift].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1