Science and ideology: The case of physics in Nazi Germany

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Metode Science Studies Journal Pub Date : 2016-07-27 DOI:10.7203/METODE.7.7665
P. Ball
{"title":"Science and ideology: The case of physics in Nazi Germany","authors":"P. Ball","doi":"10.7203/METODE.7.7665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science is not «above» politics and ethics: it is intrinsically political, and constantly raises ethical dilemmas. The consequences of evading such issues were made particularly clear in the actions of scientists working in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 40s. The accusation in 2006 that Dutch physicist Peter Debye was an opportunist who colluded with the Nazis reopened the debate about the conduct of physicists at that time. Here I consider what those events can tell us about the relationship of science and politics today. I argue that an insistence that science is an abstract, apolitical inquiry into nature is a myth that can leave it morally compromised and vulnerable to political manipulation.","PeriodicalId":41648,"journal":{"name":"Metode Science Studies Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"68-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metode Science Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/METODE.7.7665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Science is not «above» politics and ethics: it is intrinsically political, and constantly raises ethical dilemmas. The consequences of evading such issues were made particularly clear in the actions of scientists working in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 40s. The accusation in 2006 that Dutch physicist Peter Debye was an opportunist who colluded with the Nazis reopened the debate about the conduct of physicists at that time. Here I consider what those events can tell us about the relationship of science and politics today. I argue that an insistence that science is an abstract, apolitical inquiry into nature is a myth that can leave it morally compromised and vulnerable to political manipulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学与意识形态:纳粹德国的物理学
科学并非“高于”政治和伦理:它本质上是政治性的,并不断引发伦理困境。回避这些问题的后果在20世纪30年代和40年代在纳粹德国工作的科学家的行为中表现得尤为明显。2006年,荷兰物理学家彼得·德拜(Peter Debye)被指控为与纳粹勾结的机会主义者,这再次引发了关于当时物理学家行为的辩论。在这里,我将思考这些事件能告诉我们的有关当今科学与政治关系的信息。我认为,坚持认为科学是对自然的抽象的、非政治的探索是一种神话,它可能使科学在道德上妥协,容易受到政治操纵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metode Science Studies Journal
Metode Science Studies Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
MORE BIODIVERSITY TO IMPROVE OUR HEALTH The benefits to human well-being of favouring functional and diverse ecosystems Citizen consultations on science communication: A citizen science approach The plants of the future. Genome editing in biotechnology Standards. The building blocks of complexity Good to eat. Food and health at a time of information overload
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1