The tracheal detecting-bulb: a new device to distinguish tracheal from esophageal intubation.

Y. Tong, Ming Sun, Wen Tang, Jiang-Yan Xia
{"title":"The tracheal detecting-bulb: a new device to distinguish tracheal from esophageal intubation.","authors":"Y. Tong, Ming Sun, Wen Tang, Jiang-Yan Xia","doi":"10.6955/AAS.200212.0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe tracheal detecting-bulb (TDB) is a diagnostic tool for confirmation of tracheal intubation. Capnography is also accepted as a standard way for such confirmation. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the results by TDB agreed with those by capnography.\n\n\nMETHODS\nFour hundred patients were allocated to three separate studies. In 200 consecutive patients of study 1, tracheal intubation was first confirmed with the TDB followed by capnography. In study 2, 100 patients had the esophagus intentionally intubated, and confirmation was performed likewise as in study 1. The tube was then removed, the trachea was intubated, and confirmation tests followed. Study 3 involved 100 patients and was carried out in a double-blind, randomized manner. The tube was intentionally inserted into either the esophagus (n = 42) or trachea (n = 58), and confirmation tests immediately followed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn study 1, the rhythmic expansion-contraction of TDB was evident in 173 patients, and always agreed with capnographic reading; In 27 instances, the latex bulb of TDB remained collapsed or was scantily filled without the turning-up of capnographic reading as counterchecked, indicating esophageal intubation. In study 2, regardless of esophageal or tracheal intubation, agreement between TDB and capnogram was 100%. In study 3, the agreement between the two detecting instruments was 100% too. In the 400 patients studied, the results from the TDB were in complete accord with those of capnogram. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the TDB in all of these studies were 100%.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe TDB is a valuable diagnostic technique for confirming tracheal intubation as it could correctly detect esophageal or tracheal intubation of the tracheal tube in all our 400 patients. The results of using TDB agree with the results of using capnography.","PeriodicalId":79312,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":"40 4 1","pages":"159-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6955/AAS.200212.0159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

BACKGROUND The tracheal detecting-bulb (TDB) is a diagnostic tool for confirmation of tracheal intubation. Capnography is also accepted as a standard way for such confirmation. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the results by TDB agreed with those by capnography. METHODS Four hundred patients were allocated to three separate studies. In 200 consecutive patients of study 1, tracheal intubation was first confirmed with the TDB followed by capnography. In study 2, 100 patients had the esophagus intentionally intubated, and confirmation was performed likewise as in study 1. The tube was then removed, the trachea was intubated, and confirmation tests followed. Study 3 involved 100 patients and was carried out in a double-blind, randomized manner. The tube was intentionally inserted into either the esophagus (n = 42) or trachea (n = 58), and confirmation tests immediately followed. RESULTS In study 1, the rhythmic expansion-contraction of TDB was evident in 173 patients, and always agreed with capnographic reading; In 27 instances, the latex bulb of TDB remained collapsed or was scantily filled without the turning-up of capnographic reading as counterchecked, indicating esophageal intubation. In study 2, regardless of esophageal or tracheal intubation, agreement between TDB and capnogram was 100%. In study 3, the agreement between the two detecting instruments was 100% too. In the 400 patients studied, the results from the TDB were in complete accord with those of capnogram. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the TDB in all of these studies were 100%. CONCLUSIONS The TDB is a valuable diagnostic technique for confirming tracheal intubation as it could correctly detect esophageal or tracheal intubation of the tracheal tube in all our 400 patients. The results of using TDB agree with the results of using capnography.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气管检测球:一种区分气管与食管插管的新装置。
背景:气管检测球(TDB)是确认气管插管的诊断工具。二氧化碳摄影也被接受为这种确认的标准方法。本研究的目的是确定TDB的结果是否与血管造影的结果一致。方法400例患者分为3个独立研究。在研究1的200例连续患者中,首先通过TDB确认气管插管,然后进行导管造影。在研究2中,100例患者有意插管食管,并与研究1中进行了类似的确认。然后取出管子,插管,然后进行确认检查。研究3涉及100名患者,采用双盲、随机方式进行。将导管有意插入食管(42例)或气管(58例),并立即进行确认检查。结果在研究1中,173例患者TDB有节律性扩张-收缩明显,且与血糖读数一致;在27例中,TDB的乳胶球仍然塌陷或很少填充,而没有出现血糖读数作为反检,表明食管插管。在研究2中,无论食管插管还是气管插管,TDB与capography的一致性为100%。在研究3中,两种检测仪器的一致性也为100%。在研究的400例患者中,TDB的结果与脑电图完全一致。在所有这些研究中,TDB的敏感性、特异性和预测值均为100%。结论TDB在400例气管插管患者中均能正确诊断出气管插管或食管插管,是一种有价值的气管插管诊断技术。使用TDB的结果与使用毛细管造影的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The contemporary undergraduate education of anesthesia in Taiwan. Unexpected intraoperative hypercapnia due to undetected expiratory valve dysfunction--a case report. Minimal low-flow isoflurane-based anesthesia benefits patients undergoing coronary revascularization via preventing hyperglycemia and maintaining metabolic homeostasis. A two-center survey of cardiac events and peri-operative managements of cardiac patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in Taiwanese population. Comparison of the recovery from isoflurane anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1