Student Learning in Challenge-Based Engineering Curricula.

L. Berland, Taylor Martin, Pat Ko, Stephanie Baker Peacock, Jennifer J. Rudolph, Christopher Golubski
{"title":"Student Learning in Challenge-Based Engineering Curricula.","authors":"L. Berland, Taylor Martin, Pat Ko, Stephanie Baker Peacock, Jennifer J. Rudolph, Christopher Golubski","doi":"10.7771/2157-9288.1080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been a demand to teach engineering in high schools, particularly using a challenge-based curriculum. Many of these programs have the dual goals of teaching students the engineering design process (EDP), and teaching to deepen their understanding and ability to apply science and math concepts. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, this study examines whether a high school design engineering program accomplishes each of the two goals. During the 2010–2011 school year, over 100 students enrolled in the same design engineering course in seven high schools. Evidence of learning and application of the EDP is accomplished by triangulating student interviews with pre-/post-tests of EDP-related questions and a survey of design engineering beliefs. To determine whether students could apply science and math concepts, we examined content test questions to see if students used science and math ideas to justify their engineering work, and triangulated these results with student interviews. The results are mixed, implying that although there is some learning, application is inconsistent.","PeriodicalId":37951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a demand to teach engineering in high schools, particularly using a challenge-based curriculum. Many of these programs have the dual goals of teaching students the engineering design process (EDP), and teaching to deepen their understanding and ability to apply science and math concepts. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, this study examines whether a high school design engineering program accomplishes each of the two goals. During the 2010–2011 school year, over 100 students enrolled in the same design engineering course in seven high schools. Evidence of learning and application of the EDP is accomplished by triangulating student interviews with pre-/post-tests of EDP-related questions and a survey of design engineering beliefs. To determine whether students could apply science and math concepts, we examined content test questions to see if students used science and math ideas to justify their engineering work, and triangulated these results with student interviews. The results are mixed, implying that although there is some learning, application is inconsistent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于挑战的工程课程中的学生学习。
近年来,在高中有教授工程的需求,特别是使用基于挑战的课程。许多这样的课程有双重目标,即教授学生工程设计过程(EDP),并教授他们加深对科学和数学概念的理解和应用能力。采用定量和定性的方法,本研究考察了高中设计工程课程是否实现了这两个目标。在2010-2011学年,7所高中的100多名学生参加了相同的设计工程课程。学习和应用EDP的证据是通过三角测量学生访谈与EDP相关问题的前后测试和设计工程信念的调查来完成的。为了确定学生是否能够应用科学和数学概念,我们检查了内容测试问题,看看学生是否使用科学和数学概念来证明他们的工程工作,并将这些结果与学生访谈进行了三角测量。结果好坏参半,这意味着虽然有一些学习,但应用是不一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) is issued electronically twice a year and serves as a forum and community space for the publication of research and evaluation reports on areas of pre-college STEM education, particularly in engineering. J-PEER targets scholars and practitioners in the new and expanding field of pre-college engineering education. This journal invites authors to submit their original and unpublished work in the form of (1) research papers or (2) shorter practitioner reports in numerous areas of STEM education, with a special emphasis on cross-disciplinary approaches incorporating engineering. J-PEER publishes a wide range of topics, including but not limited to: research articles on elementary and secondary students’ learning; curricular and extracurricular approaches to teaching engineering in elementary and secondary school; professional development of teachers and other school professionals; comparative approaches to curriculum and professional development in engineering education; parents’ attitudes toward engineering; and the learning of engineering in informal settings.
期刊最新文献
Challenging the Notion of Role Models in Engineering Outreach Programs for Youth A Positioning Theory Analysis of Interaction Surrounding Design Failures in an Elementary Engineering Club Outcome Expectations and Environmental Factors Associated with Engineering College-Going: A Case Study Capturing Children with Autism’s Engagement in Engineering Practices: A Focus on Problem Scoping 교과기반 학습성과 평가시스템 개발: 군산대학교 공학인 건축공학심화프로그램 사례 연구
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1