The effect of education and clinical practice on knowledge enlightenment to and attitudes toward the use of analgesics for cancer pain among physicians and medical students.

L. Ger, Ming-Chien Lee, Chih-Shung Wong, Shin-Shin Chao, Jhi-Joung Wang, S. Ho
{"title":"The effect of education and clinical practice on knowledge enlightenment to and attitudes toward the use of analgesics for cancer pain among physicians and medical students.","authors":"L. Ger, Ming-Chien Lee, Chih-Shung Wong, Shin-Shin Chao, Jhi-Joung Wang, S. Ho","doi":"10.6955/AAS.200309.0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nInsufficient education and limited clinical practice on the part of physicians may contribute to the undertreatment of cancer pain in Taiwan. To address these concerns, a survey among physicians and fifth-year medical students relevant to cancer pain management (CPM) was carried out in a medical school and its principal teaching hospital.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA questionnaire on CPM was sent to 97 physicians and 78 fifth-year medical students (equivalent to the third-year medical students in the United States). The same questionnaire was delivered again to these 78 fifth-year medical students after they had completed a modified curriculum of anesthesiology with a 4-hour course on introduction to clinical pharmacology of CPM.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe physicians knowledgeable on pain (physicians of anesthesiology, hematology-oncology, or radiation oncology), physicians unfamiliar with pain (outside of anesthesiology, hematology-oncology, or radiation oncology), and the 5th-yr medical students took similar negative attitudes (24-92%, 33-89%, and 23-94%) toward the optimal use of analgesics for CPM. As compared, the mean score on knowledge of prescribing opioids of pain-knowledgeable physicians was 3.60, the highest of all as against 2.61 of other physicians and 2.54 of 5th-yr medical students. On attitudes toward prescribing opioids, both pain-knowledgeable physicians and other physicians scored a higher means, respectively of 3.52 and 2.91 as opposed to 2.68 of 5th-yr medical students, the lowest of all. However, seniority or length of clinical practice did not improve knowledge or affect attitudes toward CPM. In addition, this 4-hour course did enable the 5th-yr medical students to take a more positive attitude toward and become more knowledgeable on CPM than pain-knowledgeable physicians, as a comparison was made.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe effect of accumulation of clinical experience and seniority of clinical practice on CPM was limited among general physicians, except for clinical specialty on anesthesiology, hematology-oncology, or radiation oncology. In Taiwan, the knowledge of and positive attitude toward CPM could only be conveyed to physicians through undergraduate, post graduate or on-job education.","PeriodicalId":79312,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":"23 1","pages":"105-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6955/AAS.200309.0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

BACKGROUND Insufficient education and limited clinical practice on the part of physicians may contribute to the undertreatment of cancer pain in Taiwan. To address these concerns, a survey among physicians and fifth-year medical students relevant to cancer pain management (CPM) was carried out in a medical school and its principal teaching hospital. METHODS A questionnaire on CPM was sent to 97 physicians and 78 fifth-year medical students (equivalent to the third-year medical students in the United States). The same questionnaire was delivered again to these 78 fifth-year medical students after they had completed a modified curriculum of anesthesiology with a 4-hour course on introduction to clinical pharmacology of CPM. RESULTS The physicians knowledgeable on pain (physicians of anesthesiology, hematology-oncology, or radiation oncology), physicians unfamiliar with pain (outside of anesthesiology, hematology-oncology, or radiation oncology), and the 5th-yr medical students took similar negative attitudes (24-92%, 33-89%, and 23-94%) toward the optimal use of analgesics for CPM. As compared, the mean score on knowledge of prescribing opioids of pain-knowledgeable physicians was 3.60, the highest of all as against 2.61 of other physicians and 2.54 of 5th-yr medical students. On attitudes toward prescribing opioids, both pain-knowledgeable physicians and other physicians scored a higher means, respectively of 3.52 and 2.91 as opposed to 2.68 of 5th-yr medical students, the lowest of all. However, seniority or length of clinical practice did not improve knowledge or affect attitudes toward CPM. In addition, this 4-hour course did enable the 5th-yr medical students to take a more positive attitude toward and become more knowledgeable on CPM than pain-knowledgeable physicians, as a comparison was made. CONCLUSIONS The effect of accumulation of clinical experience and seniority of clinical practice on CPM was limited among general physicians, except for clinical specialty on anesthesiology, hematology-oncology, or radiation oncology. In Taiwan, the knowledge of and positive attitude toward CPM could only be conveyed to physicians through undergraduate, post graduate or on-job education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育和临床实践对医师和医学生肿瘤疼痛镇痛药知识启蒙和使用态度的影响。
背景医师教育程度不足及临床实践不足,可能是造成台湾癌症疼痛治疗不足的原因。为了解决这些问题,在一所医学院及其主要教学医院对医生和五年级医学生进行了有关癌症疼痛管理(CPM)的调查。方法对97名医师和78名五年级医学生(相当于美国的三年级医学生)进行CPM问卷调查。78名五年级医学生在完成了修改后的麻醉学课程和4小时的CPM临床药理学导论课程后,再次接受同样的问卷调查。结果熟悉疼痛的医生(麻醉科、血液肿瘤科或放射肿瘤科)、不熟悉疼痛的医生(麻醉科、血液肿瘤科或放射肿瘤科以外的医生)和五年级医学生对CPM镇痛药的最佳使用持相似的否定态度(24-92%、33-89%和23-94%)。相比之下,疼痛知识丰富的医生处方阿片类药物知识的平均得分为3.60分,高于其他医生的2.61分和五年级医学生的2.54分。在对处方阿片类药物的态度上,疼痛知识丰富的医生和其他医生得分更高,分别为3.52分和2.91分,而五年级医学生的得分为2.68分,是所有医学生中最低的。然而,年资或临床实践时间并没有提高对CPM的认识或影响对CPM的态度。此外,这4小时的课程确实使五年级医学生对CPM的态度比疼痛知识丰富的医生更积极,对CPM的知识也更丰富。结论除麻醉、血液肿瘤学、放射肿瘤学临床专科外,普通医师临床经验积累和临床执业年资对CPM的影响有限。在台湾,医师对CPM的认知和积极态度只能透过本科、研究生或在职教育来传达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The contemporary undergraduate education of anesthesia in Taiwan. Unexpected intraoperative hypercapnia due to undetected expiratory valve dysfunction--a case report. Minimal low-flow isoflurane-based anesthesia benefits patients undergoing coronary revascularization via preventing hyperglycemia and maintaining metabolic homeostasis. A two-center survey of cardiac events and peri-operative managements of cardiac patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in Taiwanese population. Comparison of the recovery from isoflurane anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1