Critical study of the determination of ethane by combustion over platinum in the presence excess oxygen

M. Shepherd, J. R. Branham
{"title":"Critical study of the determination of ethane by combustion over platinum in the presence excess oxygen","authors":"M. Shepherd, J. R. Branham","doi":"10.6028/JRES.011.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A sample of ethane of known purity was analyzed by the usual slow-combustion method; that is, over a hot platinum spiral in the presence of excess oxygen. The contraction after burning, the carbon dioxide produced, and the oxygen consumed were measured. The average results obtained from a series of 18 determinations indicated the impossibility of attaining the accuracies usually reported in the literature. The average volumetric equation for the reaction was C 2H 6 -|-3.5116 2 «= 1.9940 COii+ 2.5190 contraction. The weighted average eauation was CoH 6+ 3.513 2 «= 1.994 CO2+ 2.520 contraction. The contraction and oxygen consumed were invariably too high, and the carbon dioxide produced was invariably too low. The ethane was calculated from contraction, carbon dioxide, and oxygen separately and in various combinations, both uncorrected and corrected for deviations from theoretical molecular volumes. The average results from different methods of calculation varied from 99.13 percent to 100.76 percent. The best average value found by use of a single formula was 100.11 percent, and resulted from combining the contraction and carbon dioxide as one factor of an equation of which the other factor was oxygen. Such an equation eliminates part of the uncertainty concerning the proper method of correcting for deviation from theoretical molecular volumes. The averages of two pairs of formulas gave results very close to 100 percent. The ethane was also calculated on the assumption that methane, or propane, (known to be absent) was present. (The usual analysis would have been reported as methane and ethane.) Hydrocarbons other than ethane indicated by various methods of calculation from the average of the observed results varied from 0.3 percent of propane to 9.4 percent of methane. A number of sources of error are discussed. These include small measured losses of ethane and carbon dioxide in the distributor, and a small loss of carbon dioxide by solution in the water produced by the combustion and otherwise present. Such errors must be present in every apparatus of this type, and will effect the analysis of all hydrocarbons to some extent. The observed results may be explained by correcting for these errors, and for the known deviation of carbon dioxide from its theoretical molecular volume with a similar correction for ethane, which is somewhat higher than the best estimated value available.","PeriodicalId":56324,"journal":{"name":"Bureau of Standards Journal of Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"783"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1933-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureau of Standards Journal of Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/JRES.011.055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A sample of ethane of known purity was analyzed by the usual slow-combustion method; that is, over a hot platinum spiral in the presence of excess oxygen. The contraction after burning, the carbon dioxide produced, and the oxygen consumed were measured. The average results obtained from a series of 18 determinations indicated the impossibility of attaining the accuracies usually reported in the literature. The average volumetric equation for the reaction was C 2H 6 -|-3.5116 2 «= 1.9940 COii+ 2.5190 contraction. The weighted average eauation was CoH 6+ 3.513 2 «= 1.994 CO2+ 2.520 contraction. The contraction and oxygen consumed were invariably too high, and the carbon dioxide produced was invariably too low. The ethane was calculated from contraction, carbon dioxide, and oxygen separately and in various combinations, both uncorrected and corrected for deviations from theoretical molecular volumes. The average results from different methods of calculation varied from 99.13 percent to 100.76 percent. The best average value found by use of a single formula was 100.11 percent, and resulted from combining the contraction and carbon dioxide as one factor of an equation of which the other factor was oxygen. Such an equation eliminates part of the uncertainty concerning the proper method of correcting for deviation from theoretical molecular volumes. The averages of two pairs of formulas gave results very close to 100 percent. The ethane was also calculated on the assumption that methane, or propane, (known to be absent) was present. (The usual analysis would have been reported as methane and ethane.) Hydrocarbons other than ethane indicated by various methods of calculation from the average of the observed results varied from 0.3 percent of propane to 9.4 percent of methane. A number of sources of error are discussed. These include small measured losses of ethane and carbon dioxide in the distributor, and a small loss of carbon dioxide by solution in the water produced by the combustion and otherwise present. Such errors must be present in every apparatus of this type, and will effect the analysis of all hydrocarbons to some extent. The observed results may be explained by correcting for these errors, and for the known deviation of carbon dioxide from its theoretical molecular volume with a similar correction for ethane, which is somewhat higher than the best estimated value available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在过量氧存在下铂上燃烧测定乙烷的关键研究
用通常的慢燃法分析了已知纯度的乙烷样品;也就是说,在有过量氧气存在的热铂螺旋上。测量了燃烧后的收缩、产生的二氧化碳和消耗的氧气。从一系列18次测定中获得的平均结果表明,不可能达到文献中通常报道的精度。反应的平均体积方程为c2h6 -|-3.5116 2«= 1.9940 COii+ 2.5190收缩。加权平均值为coh6 + 3.513 2«= 1.994 CO2+ 2.520收缩。收缩和消耗的氧气总是过高,而产生的二氧化碳总是过低。乙烷是根据收缩、二氧化碳和氧气分别计算出来的,也可以是不同的组合,包括未校正的和校正的与理论分子体积的偏差。不同计算方法的平均结果从99.13%到100.76%不等。使用单一公式发现的最佳平均值为100.11%,这是将收缩和二氧化碳作为方程的一个因素,另一个因素是氧气。这样的方程消除了部分关于正确的方法来纠正偏离理论分子体积的不确定性。两对公式的平均值给出的结果非常接近100%。乙烷的计算也是基于甲烷或丙烷(已知不存在)存在的假设。(通常的分析结果是甲烷和乙烷。)根据观测结果的平均值,各种计算方法表明,乙烷以外的碳氢化合物的含量从丙烷的0.3%到甲烷的9.4%不等。讨论了一些误差来源。这些损失包括分布器中乙烷和二氧化碳的少量测量损失,以及燃烧产生的水中溶液和其他存在的二氧化碳的少量损失。这种误差一定存在于每一种这种类型的仪器中,并且会在某种程度上影响所有碳氢化合物的分析。观测到的结果可以通过修正这些误差来解释,也可以用类似的修正来解释二氧化碳与其理论分子体积的已知偏差,该偏差略高于现有的最佳估价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An absolute determination of the ampere Study of the system CaO-SiO2-H2O at 30 C and of the reaction of water on the anhydrous calcium silicates Preece test (copper-sulphate dip) for zinc coatings Iodine number of wool: A method for determining the action of various chemical reagents on wool and other proteins Properties of white Braille papers for Library of Congress Publications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1