Slovenia as a Stress Test of the EU’s External Dimension of Energy Policy. Case Studies of Russian and American Influence

IF 0.6 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politologicky Casopis-Czech Journal of Political Science Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5817/pc2022-1-14
Danijel Crnčec, Ana Bojinović Fenko
{"title":"Slovenia as a Stress Test of the EU’s External Dimension of Energy Policy. Case Studies of Russian and American Influence","authors":"Danijel Crnčec, Ana Bojinović Fenko","doi":"10.5817/pc2022-1-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on Slovenia’s unique historical and geopolitical position, which makes the country a highly unusual EU (Central East European – CEE) member state and determines its stance on the EU’s energy policy with respect to the USA and Russia. It pursues the research question: how does Slovenia balance between the EU energy policy framework and its particular national energy interests related to Russia and the USA? Conceptually, the article builds on the Europeanization of foreign policy applying the downloading path to Slovenian external energy policy via three indicators: the increasing salience of the European political agenda, adherence to common (EU) objectives, and internalization of EU membership and its integration process. It employs a method of statistical data and content analysis of documents and secondary sources within two case studies of energy projects, namely the South Stream involving Russia, and long-term use of nuclear energy for electricity production involving the USA. The results substantiate that Slovenia has managed to balance between its energy-related national interests and the EU energy framework by formulating and legitimizing the former within the EU policy framework. However, the second case reveals that the open EU legal framework on the member states’ choice of nuclear energy cooperatives is a notable limitation to Europeanization due to the tendency for interests in national foreign policy and domestic politics – both performed by the government – to drift away from general EU values. In the conclusion, the article identifies two important implications arising from the case of Slovenia as a stress test of the EU’s external dimension of energy policy.","PeriodicalId":53942,"journal":{"name":"Politologicky Casopis-Czech Journal of Political Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politologicky Casopis-Czech Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/pc2022-1-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on Slovenia’s unique historical and geopolitical position, which makes the country a highly unusual EU (Central East European – CEE) member state and determines its stance on the EU’s energy policy with respect to the USA and Russia. It pursues the research question: how does Slovenia balance between the EU energy policy framework and its particular national energy interests related to Russia and the USA? Conceptually, the article builds on the Europeanization of foreign policy applying the downloading path to Slovenian external energy policy via three indicators: the increasing salience of the European political agenda, adherence to common (EU) objectives, and internalization of EU membership and its integration process. It employs a method of statistical data and content analysis of documents and secondary sources within two case studies of energy projects, namely the South Stream involving Russia, and long-term use of nuclear energy for electricity production involving the USA. The results substantiate that Slovenia has managed to balance between its energy-related national interests and the EU energy framework by formulating and legitimizing the former within the EU policy framework. However, the second case reveals that the open EU legal framework on the member states’ choice of nuclear energy cooperatives is a notable limitation to Europeanization due to the tendency for interests in national foreign policy and domestic politics – both performed by the government – to drift away from general EU values. In the conclusion, the article identifies two important implications arising from the case of Slovenia as a stress test of the EU’s external dimension of energy policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯洛文尼亚作为欧盟能源政策外部维度的压力测试。俄罗斯和美国影响的案例研究
这篇文章聚焦于斯洛文尼亚独特的历史和地缘政治地位,这使该国成为一个极不寻常的欧盟(中东欧)成员国,并决定了其在欧盟能源政策中对美国和俄罗斯的立场。它追求的研究问题是:斯洛文尼亚如何在欧盟能源政策框架和与俄罗斯和美国相关的特定国家能源利益之间取得平衡?从概念上讲,本文建立在外交政策欧洲化的基础上,通过三个指标将下载路径应用于斯洛文尼亚的对外能源政策:欧洲政治议程的日益突出,对共同(欧盟)目标的坚持,以及欧盟成员国的内部化及其一体化进程。本文采用统计数据和文献内容分析的方法,分析了两个能源项目的案例研究,即涉及俄罗斯的南溪项目和涉及美国的长期利用核能发电项目。结果证实,斯洛文尼亚通过在欧盟政策框架内制定和合法化前者,成功地平衡了与能源相关的国家利益与欧盟能源框架之间的关系。然而,第二个案例表明,欧盟对成员国选择核能合作的开放法律框架是对欧化的一个显著限制,因为国家外交政策和国内政治的利益——两者都是由政府执行的——倾向于偏离欧盟的总体价值观。在结论中,文章确定了斯洛文尼亚作为欧盟能源政策外部维度压力测试的案例所产生的两个重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Czech Journal of Political Science (Politologický časopis) is a peer reviewed journal published by the International Institute of Political Science in Brno. It is the first peer reviewed political science periodical issued in the Czech Republic. The first issue of the journal was published in 1994. Each year there are three issues which come out in February, June and October. The journal provides a representative platform for presentation of the outcomes of the original political science research and thus significantly contributes to the constitution of political science as a scholarly discipline and to its establishment among other social sciences. The journal features studies, articles, review essays, discussions, reviews and information on the events in the political science community. The texts may be submitted in English language. The topics cover the areas of political philosophy and theory, comparative political science, political sociology, policy analysis, European studies, international relations and security studies. The journal is provided to the editorial board of International Political Science abstracts – Documentation politique internationale.
期刊最新文献
Agnieszka Stępińska (Ed.): Populist Political Communication Across Europe: Contexts and Contents Conspiracy Theories about Covid-19 Vaccines on a Slovak Politician’s Facebook Accounts Diane M. Zorri, Houman A. Sadri and David C. Ellis: IRANIAN PROXY GROUPS IN IRAQ, SYRIA, AND YEMEN: A PRINCIPAL-AGENT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Impact of the Election Formula Change on the Structure of Competition in Local Legislatures: Lessons from Poland Distrust or Ignorance of the Institution?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1