Assessment of Research Performance during COVID-19 Pandemic among Nursing Researchers
Soomi Kim, Seongmi Moon, Seieun Oh, Y. Son, Youngrye Park, S. Chang, Kisook Kim, Jooyoung Cheon, E. Jang, Jeonghyun Cho, Sung-Hee Yoo, H. Kim, Sung Reul Kim, Yu Hyeon Choe
求助PDF
{"title":"Assessment of Research Performance during COVID-19 Pandemic among Nursing Researchers","authors":"Soomi Kim, Seongmi Moon, Seieun Oh, Y. Son, Youngrye Park, S. Chang, Kisook Kim, Jooyoung Cheon, E. Jang, Jeonghyun Cho, Sung-Hee Yoo, H. Kim, Sung Reul Kim, Yu Hyeon Choe","doi":"10.7475/kjan.2021.33.4.406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to assess the research performance during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among nursing researchers. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted for Korean Society of Adult Nursing where 103 subjects participated from April 15 to May 14, 2021. The survey tool developed by researchers had 32 items including difficulties in performing research activities, perception of the impact of COVID-19 on research validity, and three open-ended questions. Results: In the research planning phase, 88 subjects (90.7%) reported difficulties in the recruitment plan and 83 subjects (89.3%) reported difficulties selecting a research design. In the recruitment and data collection phase, 85 subjects (88.6%) had difficulties accessing data collection site and 78 subjects (85.7%) had difficulties in face-to-face data collection. In the provision of intervention phase (for experimental study), 26 subjects (66.7%) reported that they should have changed the method of delivery of intervention. In research administration and manpower management, 62 subjects (75.6%) reported difficulties in face-to-face meeting. In research outcome management, 65 subjects (85.5%) reported that they should have changed the way of research-related events. Lastly, 80 subjects (81.6%) perceived that difficulties caused by COVID-19 impacted research validity. Conclusion: Majority of participants perceived that the difficulties in research activities may decrease research validity. To ensure research quality during COVID-19 pandemic, we should recognize potential threats to research validity and actively pursue adaptable innovations of research designs and data collection methods. © 2021,Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":38646,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Adult Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Adult Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2021.33.4.406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
COVID-19大流行期间护理研究人员研究绩效评估
本研究的目的是评估2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间护理研究人员的研究绩效。方法:于2021年4月15日至5月14日对韩国成人护理学会进行横断面在线调查,共103名受试者参与。研究人员开发的调查工具包括开展研究活动的困难、对新冠肺炎对研究效度影响的感知、3个开放式问题等32个项目。结果:在研究计划阶段,88名受试者(90.7%)报告招募计划困难,83名受试者(89.3%)报告研究设计选择困难。在招募和数据收集阶段,85名受试者(88.6%)难以进入数据收集现场,78名受试者(85.7%)难以面对面收集数据。在提供干预阶段(实验研究阶段),26名受试者(66.7%)报告他们应该改变干预的提供方式。在研究行政和人力管理方面,有62名(75.6%)被调查者表示在面对面的交流中遇到了困难。在研究结果管理方面,65名受试者(85.5%)报告他们应该改变研究相关事件的方式。最后,80名受试者(81.6%)认为COVID-19造成的困难影响了研究的效度。结论:大部分被试认为研究活动的困难会降低研究的效度。为确保新冠肺炎大流行期间的研究质量,我们应认识到对研究有效性的潜在威胁,积极寻求研究设计和数据收集方法的适应性创新。©2021,韩国成人护理杂志。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。